Author
|
Topic: "Objectively such-and-such"
|
|
|
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478
|
posted 05 September 2004 03:33 PM
It's even worse than that, though. That terminology erects a paranoid category of thought-crime -- that is, someone critical of my view (on whatever) is not just disagreeing with me about the effects of my position; he is slyly claiming to know something about what is going on in my head, and nothing I can say -- short of agreeing with him, of course -- can acquit me of that charge. It is circular and paranoid and hallucinatory, and of course we all know where such rhetorical games led in, eg, the Soviet Union, where political dissenters were often diagnosed and incarcerated as mentally ill. Of course: if you disagree with me, you must be sick. *barf*
From: gone | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
'lance
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1064
|
posted 05 September 2004 03:51 PM
Yes, to claim someone is "objectively pro-" this or "objectively anti-" that is to move the argument to another level. Instead of arguing about what someone says on its merits or lack thereof, you're simply imputing motive to them.Edit: Hitchens, by the way, used to pour scorn on such rhetorical manoeuvres. But in the last three years or so he seems to have entirely forgotten his former pretensions to intellectual rigour. [ 05 September 2004: Message edited by: 'lance ]
From: that enchanted place on the top of the Forest | Registered: Jul 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478
|
posted 05 September 2004 04:02 PM
I think that it really was quite wicked -- sad, too, of course -- of Orwell to have claimed that pacifists were "pro-fascists." But that is an excellent and clear example of the problem. The vast majority of pacifists in WWII would have been strongly anti-fascist, and in fact it is hard for me to imagine a pacifist fascist, certainly of the Nazi variant. Even if one thought that their position was wrong, that it would help the enemy cause, one would still have to accept at face-value their self-identification as anti-fascist. We can say that we believe that someone like that is wrong, but we can't logically say that she is pro- something else that she hates. It is just that she also hates war, as much or more. [ 05 September 2004: Message edited by: skdadl ]
From: gone | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|