Author
|
Topic: Immunology in the spotlight at the Dover 'Intelligent Design' trial
|
|
|
jeff house
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 518
|
posted 23 April 2006 03:38 PM
On a more serious note, this article is interesting because it quotes the trial judge's complete dismissal of the main ID proponent, Michael Behe: quote: In fact, on cross-examination, Professor Behe was questioned concerning his 1996 claim that science would never find an evolutionary explanation for the immune system. He was presented with fifty-eight peer-reviewed publications, nine books, and several immunology textbook chapters about the evolution of the immune system; however, he simply insisted that this was still not sufficient evidence of evolution, and that it was not 'good enough.'We find that such evidence demonstrates that the ID argument is dependent upon setting a scientifically unreasonable burden of proof for the theory of evolution.
Nice article.
From: toronto | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|