Author
|
Topic: climate change will destroy us
|
|
|
SHH
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1527
|
posted 28 February 2004 08:12 PM
quote: Not a problem; Bush doesn't read any reports.
But if he did he’d read this in the forward: quote: Imagining the UnthinkableThe purpose of this report is to imagine the unthinkable – to push the boundaries of current research on climate change so we may better understand the potential implications on United States national security. We have interviewed leading climate change scientists, conducted additional research, and reviewed several iterations of the scenario with these experts. The scientists support this project, but caution that the scenario depicted is extreme in two fundamental ways. First, they suggest the occurrences we outline would most likely happen in a few regions, rather than on globally. Second, they say the magnitude of the event may be considerably smaller. We have created a climate change scenario that although not the most likely, is plausible, and would challenge United States national security in ways that should be considered immediately.
It appears the Pentagon outsourced this project to some so-called Futurists who fabricated the extreme case of the extreme case. Those boys, always thinking ahead. The Report.
From: Ex-Silicon Valley to State Saguaro | Registered: Oct 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
DrConway
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 490
|
posted 29 February 2004 12:46 AM
Even kids can read simple charts, and a simple chart I saw in a Highlights magazine from about 1979 (or was it 1982?) showed the long-term rise in the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.Any idiot can tell you that if the CO2 content is only about 0.2% (or 0.02, I don't have my chemistry text in front of me and can't be buggered to go get it right this moment) to begin with, then perhaps even very small changes in that amount can have rather large results. SHH, climate change means not just global warming, but in general, more volatility in the climate whether cold or warm. So just because last winter 6 feet of snow fell down on the ground, that does not and I mean that emphatically, not mean that global warming is nonexistent. Has it ever occurred to you that the rate of water circulation as the vapor phase in the atmosphere is affected by the rate of heat transfer between the oceans and the atmosphere, which is in turn affected by, wait for it.... the proportion of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere! WHOA! DAMN! So maybe climate change manifested itself that year as more frequent and more violent precipitation. Oh, but I'm just an alarmist chicken little left-wing nuclear chemist. Discount everything I say. [ 29 February 2004: Message edited by: DrConway ]
From: You shall not side with the great against the powerless. | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
DrConway
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 490
|
posted 29 February 2004 03:29 AM
Well, I wouldn't call them findings so much as predictions, and while my oceanography is a bit sketchy, I do know that one of the important drivers of climate is the rate of internal heat transfer in the oceans themselves, and this is partly dictated by differential changes in density (which is itself a function of how much salt is in a given volume of water) in different points in the ocean.The summary of the above statement runs as follows: Water moves from high density (high salt concentration) to low density (low salt concentration), carrying thermal energy with it. Anything that changes this flow rate will screw up the climate due to ocean-atmosphere heat transfer. A sudden boost in the flow rate of cold water to the surface of the oceans would cool the surrounding air, increasing the number of cloudy days and possibly ruining agriculture if this change is large enough.
From: You shall not side with the great against the powerless. | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trinitty
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 826
|
posted 01 March 2004 11:34 AM
I read the in the Guardian last month that Oil production will peak this year and that the supply will run OUT in "our lifetimes" - the writer was in his forties.So. Companies will keep burning it for fuel while it is in shorter and shorter supply. Good thing we don't need it for things like plastics... what good have they ever done? sigh
From: Europa | Registered: Jun 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560
|
posted 01 March 2004 12:54 PM
quote: Originally posted by CMOT Dibbler: This news is very depressing. It's even more depressing because I can't do anything about it. I am a poor student. I don't belong to Greenpeace or any of the other powerful environmental organizations. I live at home. It would be very difficult for me to head to Vancouver and participate in protests.
That's okay, because that won't help either. It may make the protesters feel better, but it's not really going to do anything to help the environment, because those who have the power to change things won't be listening to them. The best thing you can do for the environment is to change the way you live, and perhaps, if you can, influence those around you to change, too. Do the three r's. Walk, bike, or take public transit. Buy organic if you can afford it, or at least eat lower on the food chain if you can't afford organic (I can't). Stop buying stuff you don't need. That's revolutionary, and if enough people did it, that's what would change the world. If you're already doing these things, then you're doing your part.
From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
redshift
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1675
|
posted 03 March 2004 11:58 PM
consumer capitalism is about to eat itself, and the appetite for change is hard to see. "In other cases, governments need to restrict risk-taking, such as approving housing developments in low-lying areas, and improve catastrophe management capabilities. In the long term, Swiss Re said, greenhouse gases widely thought to trigger global warming will need to be reduced, the use of fossil fuels cut and new energy technologies developed. "The role of the insurance industry is through establishing risk adequate tariffs and to give the risk taker the opportunity to implement appropriate measures to reduce the chance of possible losses," Heck said." http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/0303-07.htm what happens when the financial power structure in the technologically dependent countries collapses, the developing countries are pursuing the same destructive course that caused global destruction, and the marginalized and exploited are armed and dangerous? picture fortress north america, under seige and torn by domestic civil unrest and factionalism. retirement isn't looking so good.
From: cranbrook,bc | Registered: Oct 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|