babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » walking the talk   » babblers helping babblers   » Question About Abortion Funding

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Question About Abortion Funding
Star Spangled Canadian
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 15502

posted 25 September 2008 10:19 AM      Profile for Star Spangled Canadian     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Hi Everyone,

First, I don't want to start an argument about abortion in general as I'm sure that's been done to death and nobody would be likely to change their views. I just ahve a question specifically realted to how abortion is funded in Canada and if anyone is able to answer it, that would be appreciated.

I was jsut reading an article on the Star's website found at: http://www.thestar.com/FederalElection/article/506014
and it mentioned trying to force the government to pay for abortions in the province of New Brunswick.

I'm confused about how abortion is funded in Canada. I've never practiced medicine here so don't know the ins and outs of the billing system but I assumed that it was already covered. Or is it only that "essential medical procedures" are covered and abortion does not fall into that definition, which allows people to pay for it as an "optional service". Is it that if it's done at a hospital, public health coverage pays for it but if it's done in a private clinic, the patient pays out of pocket? Wouldn't that run afoul of the Canada Health Act and be considered two-tier health care whereby people with money can get services faster or better than people without it?

If anyone knows these questions, I'd love to hear from you. Reading that article piqued my curiosity.


From: Originally from Ontario, now in Virginia | Registered: Sep 2008  |  IP: Logged
writer
editor emeritus
Babbler # 2513

posted 25 September 2008 10:24 AM      Profile for writer     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
part one of choice in Canada: access to abortions, by Sarah Ghabrial, section15.ca
From: tentative | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged
Star Spangled Canadian
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 15502

posted 25 September 2008 10:34 AM      Profile for Star Spangled Canadian     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Thanks, writer. That was an interesting article that clarified some questions. Here in the states (at least MY state) it's only funded when deemed "medically necessary" (i.e. life in danger) and msot private insurance won't cover it.

In Canada, given some of the limitations on its fudning in certain areas, private clinics DO seem necessary. I just don't see how this isn't considered "two-tier" and how it wouldn't vioalte teh canada health Act. Thanks again for the link, though.


From: Originally from Ontario, now in Virginia | Registered: Sep 2008  |  IP: Logged
writer
editor emeritus
Babbler # 2513

posted 25 September 2008 10:46 AM      Profile for writer     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
You'd find more detail here:

Abortion Access and Funding, Abortion Rights Coalition of Canada


From: tentative | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged
bagkitty
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 15443

posted 25 September 2008 10:59 AM      Profile for bagkitty     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The latest information (that I can find with a quick search) on the situation in Alberta (currently funding both hospital and clinic procedures) [contradictions work themselves out differently in Alberta than elsewhere in the country]

http://www.prochoiceactionnetwork-canada.org/articles/defunding.shtml


From: Calgary | Registered: Aug 2008  |  IP: Logged
Bowes/McDougall
recent-rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12074

posted 25 September 2008 06:24 PM      Profile for Bowes/McDougall     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
People have to remember that the "Canada Health Act" is not a regular act in the sense that the provisions of the act are not enforceble in the courts.

The power to legislate and regulate healthcare is exclusively the authority of the provincial legislatures. The federal CHA stipulates conditions for which federal funds will be contributed to a provincial healthcare system, and can only be "enforced" by withholding such funds. Thus, if a province had the financial resources, or the political will to defy the CHA, it is more that within its consitutional jurisdiction to do so, and the feds besides holding the cash back, pretty much have to sit on their hands.


From: Etobicoke | Registered: Feb 2006  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 25 September 2008 06:25 PM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Let's move this to babblers helping babblers, since this isn't really breaking news.
From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca