Do you believe Oswald killed Kennedy alone, three shots from the depositary, of which 1 bullet turned 11 (im guessing) times before being found completely intact?

[ 05 March 2007: Message edited by: SavageInTheCity ]

quote:

---

Originally posted by SavageInTheCity:
Sort of off-topic, but not quite...

Since this thread has some varying opinions, im intrigued....so I have to ask:

Do you believe Oswald killed Kennedy alone, three shots from the depositary, of which 1 bullet turned 11 (im guessing) times before being found completely intact?

---

I don't know precisely what elements in the U.S. government might want to hide about 9-11 if it isn't their own involvement in it, but it could be their own incompetence in failing to put together the pieces and figure out about the plot in advance. It could be that there was something in particular about WTC 7, unrelated to the 9-11 plot, that people wanted to hide -- after all, it was an office / storage area for government departments who dealt with highly restricted information.

In the case of the JFK assassination, it's perhaps easier to divine motives for a cover-up. Oswald had connections to anti-Castro Cubans who in turn had connections to the Mob. Both of these groups had their reasons for hating JFK. And both were involved in US government efforts to kill Castro. Perhaps the Mob and / or the anti-Castro Cubans killed Kennedy, maybe using two or more shooters. People in the US government then covered this up out of fear that a full investigation would lead to their anti-Castro plots being exposed, which could've had consequences for them personally, for internal US public opinion of the government in general, and for US-Soviet relations.

Based on the tone of the question, I take it most of you get my viewpoint. Oswald didnt even fire a shot, probably wasnt even in the depositary. What happened, we will never know.

Theres a video on video.google.com that makes a point of saying George Bush (Papa Bush) was involved in the assassination. Makes some intriguing points.....Like Papa Bush was in Dallas the day of, WAS working for CIA, lied about it later, had connections to everyone involved, 3 known CIA hitmen linked to Papa Bush were dispatched to Dallas in the right time frame.

quote:

---

Originally posted by SavageInTheCity:
I asked the question....its impolite not to answer ones question isnt it?

---

Not searching for a fight....if i was id simply call you a commu....ummm....forget that...

SITC
ETA - that was an attempt at humor.....nothing more!

[ 06 March 2007: Message edited by: SavageInTheCity ]

quote:

---

I asked the question....its impolite not to answer ones question isnt it?

---

...it does not say "its impolite not to answer ones own question." But I can see how one would write it that way.

Its an easy enough mistake to make. It seemed to me that you were needling Obscurantist for not answering, and being evasive by talking up counter theories.

Sorry.

[ 06 March 2007: Message edited by: Cueball ]

Maybe my point was a bit murky. I can try to expand on it if that'd be helpful, but I don't have time to right now.

I will say that I think the official version of the JFK assassination doesn't hold up, certainly not from the perspective of basic physics or ballistics, and probably not from the perspective of Oswald as the killer, based on both his unclear motives and his apparent lack of marksmanship skills.

Whatever the case, it would not be dismissed as "conspiracy theory."

In fact as similar story can be found in Soviet history, and that is the killing of Kirov the Leningrad Party boss in 1931, and the theory that Stalin had a hand in Kirov's assassination is widely accepted, and based on little to no concrete proof other than conjecture, and stray dilinquencies in the official version of events.

[ 06 March 2007: Message edited by: Cueball ]