babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » right brain babble   » humanities & science   » What percentage of government revenue is derived from which type of tax?

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: What percentage of government revenue is derived from which type of tax?
prowsej
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 798

posted 28 August 2002 08:40 PM      Profile for prowsej   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I'd like to see a pie chart of what percentage of federal revenue is derived from each of its income sources (corporate income tax, personal income tax, GST/HST, tarrifs, etc.)

Does anyone know where I could find such information?


From: Ottawa ON | Registered: Jun 2001  |  IP: Logged
DrConway
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 490

posted 28 August 2002 08:48 PM      Profile for DrConway     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Funny you should ask. I was checking into this for some related information, and found these wonderful Fiscal Reference Tables.

Look on page 14 in the PDF for a breakdown by percentage of GDP, and page 15 for a breakdown by percentage of revenues.

You will note that corporate income tax levels have dropped by about 5 percentage points (on average) post-1970. Individual income tax levels have more than risen to compensate, rising by about 10 percentage points on average. (Both percentage changes in terms of the total budget)

The UIC/EI payroll tax collections have risen steadily since the 1970s.

"Excise taxes and duties" includes the GST and the older MST, but you can see that there is a pronounced drop since 1990.

On page 16 we note that the GST makes up the bulk of such excise tax collections, and in fact, contrary to Michael Wilson's oft-cited claims of being "revenue neutral", it has brought in more money in nominal dollars than the old MST did.

This is because the GST tax base is wider than the MST's.

We may further note that on page 21, the CHST was phased in and the net result has been lower overall transfers to provinces than under the old "spending envelope transfer" method wherein monies so transferred could only be used provincially for their intended purpose.


From: You shall not side with the great against the powerless. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
prowsej
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 798

posted 29 August 2002 01:30 AM      Profile for prowsej   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The "Excise taxes and duties" make up 20% of government revenue. I had no idea that it was that high.

Thanks for the information, DrC: it's interesting.


From: Ottawa ON | Registered: Jun 2001  |  IP: Logged
Sisyphus
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1425

posted 29 August 2002 05:55 PM      Profile for Sisyphus     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Thank you , Dr. Conway. I've recently treated myself and some hapless Babblers to a couple of rants , very loosely focused upon the predominance of rhetorical vs. factual political discourse. It was precipitated by my hearing Lowell Green saying something to the effect that people are paying the highest taxes now than at any time in the past 27 years. I confess I have a knee-jerk reflex against anything that erupts from Mount Green, but I had no facts at my disposal. Also, there are many elements of received economic wisdom that I wish to investigate. F'rinstance: Is their a negative correlation between corporate tax cuts and unemployment levels? This link you provided is pure gold in this respect. Thanks again.
From: Never Never Land | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca