Are there significances to the events, as they unfold?

Using Thales of Miletus primary principal, as a basis in the time variable measures of climate perspective, are we given a preview of what is not only happening in the cosmo, but is also happening in our deterministc approaches to weather predictions?

Given a appropriate response to the Daisey, Taylor was very helpful in explaining Mecuries orbital patterns, but now this process having moved to "higher dimensional understanding" recognizes the value of such images that the strange attractor brings to us?

Now like I said before only a few will understand, so without rude comments, I wonder if some those who do understand might comment to correct any mistakes I have made?

[ 09 June 2005: Message edited by: forum observer ]

quote:

---

Originally posted by blacklisted:
no doubt the universe is unfolding as it should?
http://www.fleurdelis.com/desiderata.htm
support B.C.'s #1 growth industry

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by GJJ:
Actually I'm not sure what you're trying to say. Most applications of chaos theory are theoretically deterministic (in most applications the chaos comes from a system of deterministic non-linear partial differential equations), but since they're in practice solved numerically there is a certain unavoidable random element. This is certainly the case in climate modelling ... the chaos comes automatically from the nature of the equations solved. It is also true of cosmology ...

---

I guess in a sense mathematical modelling, would ask that we see in a way that we didn't before?

We know the computational models, if ever considered in context of the qubit and further reductionism processes, can hold a lot of information.

However we make sense of it. Gerard t'hooft raises important questions about this? In regards to the Einstein at home project and how it was set up in Seti for homecomputers. Ligo needed these screens for translation.

Yesterday, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, announced that it has teamed with Force10 Networks, SysKonnect, FineTec Computers and Ixia to put together a demonstration system running a real-world scientific application (Cactus -- developed by Professor Ed Seidel and his team at the Albert Einstein Institute in Potsdam, Germany) to produce data on one cluster, and then ship over the resulting data across a 10-Gigabit Ethernet connection to another cluster, where it is then rendered for visualization. Specifically, it visualizes the gravity waves resulting from the collision of two black holes.

But in this sense, numerical relativity has created wonderful images, but if we are to reconstruct views on the cosmo, what purpose would,langrange serve.

You had to look for other applications that can be "inferred" and this is possible when thinking of "ISCAP mantra of images." Make sure you refresh their page each time and you'll understand what I mean?

String theorists are strange birds

[ 09 June 2005: Message edited by: forum observer ]

[ 09 June 2005: Message edited by: forum observer ]

quote:

---

Originally posted by Surferosad:
A had a friend who was a physicist, and each time he would get really drunk, he would start long aggressive soliloquies about how chaos theory was the key to everything...

Nobody would dare to disagree with him, since he would become pretty agitated and violent if you did.

---

Okay, I'll try and be gentle with you....and stop taking a drink when your around

So all that's left is the higher deductive reasoning powers you might have? What's left?

....No I am not a physicist, but I like their concepts

Cosmo Kramer

[ 09 June 2005: Message edited by: forum observer ]