babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » right brain babble   » humanities & science   » How bad is this stock market downturn going to be?

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: How bad is this stock market downturn going to be?
500_Apples
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12684

posted 16 August 2007 04:47 PM      Profile for 500_Apples   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I'm surprised this has not been discussed here yet.

Currently, north american exchanges are down about 10% or from their highs, the Canadian dollars has fallen around 4 cents, there are billions of dollars in right-offs. Will the market soon reach the bottom of the trough? Will it crash another 20%? Will this be a minor recession?


From: Montreal, Quebec | Registered: Jun 2006  |  IP: Logged
Stephen Gordon
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4600

posted 16 August 2007 05:11 PM      Profile for Stephen Gordon        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I'm not panicking. At least, not yet.

The immediate problem is the 'subprime' (i.e., high-risk) mortgage meltdown in the US. Lots of financial institutions piled into them during the housing boom, but no-one knows exactly who is most exposed to this risk. As a result, no-one is willing to lend anything to anyone, until people figure out just who really is in trouble. And investors are bailing out of companies that might be vulnerable.

The central banks - which have learned their lesson from 1929 - are intervening in the market by acting as the 'lender of last resort'. It should be noted that this is not free money for investors, they are *loans*, at relatively high rates of interest. They're also implementing measures that will make it easier to borrow in the market (such as modifying collateral rules). This part of the adjustment should take a couple of weeks.

The longer-term risk is of a US recession, associated with a slowdown in the housing sector. Then again, people have been predicting a recession for several years now, and it hasn't happened yet. The risk is real enough, but it's not yet a certainty.


From: . | Registered: Oct 2003  |  IP: Logged
Agent 204
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4668

posted 16 August 2007 05:18 PM      Profile for Agent 204   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Interesting that someone quoted on CBC today said that the reason Canadian stocks were down, despite good fundamentals (whatever that consists of) was that US hedge funds needed cash to cover their losses, and thus sold their foreign holdings. If so, and if this does turn out to be a hiccup, then those stocks could turn out to be real bargains.

Of course, if it is the start of something bigger, all bets are off.


From: home of the Guess Who | Registered: Nov 2003  |  IP: Logged
Stephen Gordon
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4600

posted 16 August 2007 05:24 PM      Profile for Stephen Gordon        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
OTOH, no-one has the loose change (aka 'liquidity') to buy up all those cheap stocks...
From: . | Registered: Oct 2003  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 16 August 2007 05:41 PM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Sounds a bit serious. The Bank of Canada is holding off on that rate hike they've been promising everyone for months.
From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
Agent 204
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4668

posted 16 August 2007 05:42 PM      Profile for Agent 204   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Stephen Gordon:
OTOH, no-one has the loose change (aka 'liquidity') to buy up all those cheap stocks...

I guess that's because potential lenders are afraid to lend money to buy them, right?

I'm not sure what to make of this, but I don't have a good feeling about it. At any rate, I'm glad my job is fairly recession resistant.

[ 16 August 2007: Message edited by: Agent 204 ]


From: home of the Guess Who | Registered: Nov 2003  |  IP: Logged
Polly Brandybuck
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7732

posted 16 August 2007 06:20 PM      Profile for Polly Brandybuck     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
The White House declined to comment on the sharp moves in financial markets, and stuck to its view that the U.S. economy was fundamentally sound and should continue to grow.
Nero fiddling...

From: To Infinity...and beyond! | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
Erik Redburn
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5052

posted 16 August 2007 06:51 PM      Profile for Erik Redburn     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Bad, but necessary.
From: Broke but not bent. | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged
Farmpunk
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12955

posted 17 August 2007 01:29 AM      Profile for Farmpunk     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The thing that confuses me about this whole stock market crash\scare is that the biz mags have been sounding serious warnings about the impact of sub-prime and the attendant collapse of the housing market boom for months now. So when it happens it's almost as if no one has been paying attention. Whether this is on purpose is another matter.

The cheap stock buyback issue aside, what's going to happen to all these now cheap and unsellable houses? It was one of the biggest building sprees on record, I believe. And if hte sub-prime market was geared towards people who didn't have the money to buy homes, then perhaps the US at a fed or state level could take on what has become the sub-prime burden and back the loans of people in need of homes. It'd be a very public buyout and bailout of a speculative (to use a generous term) market but it could be used for good....


From: SW Ontario | Registered: Jul 2006  |  IP: Logged
Agent 204
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4668

posted 17 August 2007 03:30 AM      Profile for Agent 204   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Yeah it could... probably not by the Bush administration though.
From: home of the Guess Who | Registered: Nov 2003  |  IP: Logged
scooter
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5548

posted 23 August 2007 02:44 PM      Profile for scooter     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Farmpunk:
The cheap stock buyback issue aside, what's going to happen to all these now cheap and unsellable houses?

Not much. The number of houses involved with subprime mortgages is very small.

From: High River | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
Tommy_Paine
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 214

posted 24 August 2007 01:43 AM      Profile for Tommy_Paine     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Actually, I thought something was up when I saw reports on the over heated housing market in Calgary.

Being close to fifty, I remember the last time that happened. So none of this surprises me any.

The dollar being down so quickly and dramatically will help the stressed manufacturing sector, as long as it continues to slide.


From: The Alley, Behind Montgomery's Tavern | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
jester
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11798

posted 24 August 2007 09:17 AM      Profile for jester        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
In the short term, much pain for investors who invested in derivatives or ABCPs. Asset backed commercial paper,90 day loans backed by car loans etc that offer high return short term exposure.

In the long term, the bankers who started and perpetuated this scam will benefit from the fees they "earn" straightening this mess out and YOU,my friends, will do ALL the suffering.

Either through lower pension fund returns,mutual fund exposure to derivative losses,ownership of stocks with derivatives exposure,lowered access to affordable credit,higher bank fees or any combination of the above, the little consumer WILL pay the whole tab for this fiasco while the sneaky bastards who bundled BBB rated derivatives into "investment grade" money market instruments look the other way.

Ontario Teacher's, Barrick, Dallas Police Pension, CALPERS ( California state employees pensions) the fiasco extends its tentacles everywhere. The only winners,as usual, will be the lawyers and the banks as the pension and mutual fund big boys start suing.

Oh, yeah....don't forget, all you little folks will also be paying for the lawyers.

[ 24 August 2007: Message edited by: jester ]


From: Against stupidity, the Gods themselves contend in vain | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged
jester
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11798

posted 24 August 2007 09:26 AM      Profile for jester        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Stephen Gordon:
OTOH, no-one has the loose change (aka 'liquidity') to buy up all those cheap stocks...

Steven: The only option for those who are not market savvy,ie players is to sit tight. Market fundamentals will return and stocks driven below value by downward spiralling margin calls and institutional selling to cover panicky redemptions will soon come back up.

Some "cheap" stocks are a bargain but one has to have the informed opinion to determine which are bargains and which are turkeys being dumped as the recent gains are pared.

Even worse than indiscriminate bargain hunting is succumbing to market hysteria and panic selling good stocks. Sit tight and wait it out.


From: Against stupidity, the Gods themselves contend in vain | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged
torontoprofessor
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14260

posted 24 August 2007 12:21 PM      Profile for torontoprofessor     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Farmpunk:
The cheap stock buyback issue aside, what's going to happen to all these now cheap and unsellable houses?

If they get cheap enough, then maybe they'll be sellable? (Maybe this remark/question is proof that I'm not an economist.)


From: Toronto | Registered: Jun 2007  |  IP: Logged
Stephen Gordon
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4600

posted 24 August 2007 12:26 PM      Profile for Stephen Gordon        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
No, that sounds right. The 'real' (as opposed to financial) consequence of the whole thing is that the housing industry - which has been an important source of growth in the US - will take a hit as the stock of houses gets absorbed. If existing houses can be had at distress prices, fewer people are going to pay to have a new one built.
From: . | Registered: Oct 2003  |  IP: Logged
jester
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11798

posted 24 August 2007 08:23 PM      Profile for jester        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
While the numbers appear daunting, the foreclosure rate in the US does not affect the great majority of homeowners who are not selling.

It is the risk-takers who are exposed to the consequences of leverage,either in real estate or financial markets who will suffer most.

The sub-prime market is only 11% of the US mortgage market. The majority of home-owners and investors have little direct exposure to either sub-prime or derivatives and most of the "panic" is media driven.

This correction is strenghtening the reputation of the Candollar. In the near future,the Cando and Swissfranc will become refuges from the sinking greenback and the dysfunctional Euro.


From: Against stupidity, the Gods themselves contend in vain | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca