babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » right brain babble   » humanities & science   » Advertizing and market distortion.

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Advertizing and market distortion.
Brian White
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8013

posted 22 June 2006 10:43 PM      Profile for Brian White   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I think one of the biggest unfree thing about the free market is advertizing. Advertizing makes people comfortable with a choice of 2 brands of soft drinks. Pepsi and Coke. All they are are sweatened carbonated water. So any local producer should have a competitive advantage.
But no. They truck The concentrate all over the world. Kids want to fit in with the tv images and pretend they are beautiful people. kids grow up and get afraid of anything new and when they go to other cities, they rush to the security of the golden arches.
The big 2 soft drinks companys killed off competition with free drinks coolers for shops years back. (But you could only stock the coolers with their product) And so with little space and not enough money in independent shops for 2 drinks fridges, the little guys were killed off.
Starved of visibility in their own towns.
with corperate media outlets getting bigger and bigger, the distortion gets greater and choice diminishes. Agreed?

From: Victoria Bc | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged
Adam T
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4631

posted 23 June 2006 12:06 AM      Profile for Adam T     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Market share
from oligopolywatch
(I think this is Canadian figures)
Coca Cola
44.1%
Coke, Sprite, Barq, Fanta, Mello Yello, etc.

Pepsico
31.4%
Pepsi, Mountain Dew, Mug, Slice, etc.

Cadbury/Schweppes
14.7%
Seven-Up, Dr. Pepper, Schweppes, A & W, Canada Dry, Sunkist, Squirt, etc.

From: Richmond B.C | Registered: Nov 2003  |  IP: Logged
Adam T
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4631

posted 23 June 2006 12:10 AM      Profile for Adam T     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I've been to Victoria in the past year. There are a load of "mom and pop" stores around, especially near the residential areas.
From: Richmond B.C | Registered: Nov 2003  |  IP: Logged
WackAVole
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8561

posted 02 July 2006 07:47 PM      Profile for WackAVole   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I really hate advertising, but...

Just West of Tianamen Square is a modern shopping area that, with its huge commerical billboards, could be mistaken for any N.American city (well, maybe near a Chinatown in any NA city).

My knee-jerk reaction is "look all the f*****' advertising ". But I have friends in media/advertising and rather than working low-pay jobs or factory jobs they sell advertising. That changed my outlook a bit. Now I think it is better for those big rich companies to spread some money around via local advertising rather than send it all back overseas or into fewer (already wealthy) hands up above.

Seeing those golden arches when in a foriegn land can be a huge freaking relief.

The examples given earlier about coke and pepsi coolers is different than simple advertising.

I agree attaching "coolness" to consumer products is very sucky (sorry, I'm sleepy now, my language skills are weak) but what option is there in a free society? (maybe better public education.)


From: Edmonton | Registered: Mar 2005  |  IP: Logged
albear
recent-rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12968

posted 27 July 2006 07:47 PM      Profile for albear     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I have just been doing research about Pepsico. I cannot believe how many different products they offer besides the regular Soft drinks (Gatorade,Tropicana,Propel,Aquafina,Starbucks,Lipton). How is a small vendor supposed to get shelf space, and Coca Cola probalbly owns the other half of the products I find on the supermarket shelves.
From: Cleveland | Registered: Jul 2006  |  IP: Logged
otter
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12062

posted 28 July 2006 02:02 PM      Profile for otter        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Advertisers would not be so popular without mindless populations that consume their tripe without considering the consequences.

I am reminded of an instance where, while staying with some friends, i muted a commercial on tv. The outraged response of the kids was horrifying to me. I am also reminded of a Simpson's episode where Lisa points out that the only songs anyone knows are commercial jingos.

Then there is the very real knowledge that our politicians use the services of ad agencies to pitch their agendas to voters.

All of which shows that there are still lots of folks who are unwilling to admit that 'the emperor is wearing no clothes'.


From: agent provocateur inc. | Registered: Feb 2006  |  IP: Logged
500_Apples
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12684

posted 28 July 2006 02:26 PM      Profile for 500_Apples   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Personally if I was a parent today I would try and raise my kids for the first few years without television to limit their exposure to advertising for junk foods specifically, though I'm not sure I'd succeed in withstanding their pleas.

Another good advertising case study, the US pharmaceutical inudstry spends ~20 billion on R&D and ~47 billion on marketting. How much corporate welfare does it get? About 20 billion.


From: Montreal, Quebec | Registered: Jun 2006  |  IP: Logged
mayakovsky
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5171

posted 28 July 2006 11:12 PM      Profile for mayakovsky     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Just don't get cable. All I ever see are Canadian Tire ads and retirement program ads.

I must admit, though I am only 40, the ads for the walk in baths sound intriguing. A little seat and I can read, answer the phone with water splashing over my happy area. Damn commercialism.


From: New Bedford | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged
Brian White
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8013

posted 30 July 2006 11:17 PM      Profile for Brian White   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by albear:
I have just been doing research about Pepsico. I cannot believe how many different products they offer besides the regular Soft drinks (Gatorade,Tropicana,Propel,Aquafina,Starbucks,Lipton). How is a small vendor supposed to get shelf space, and Coca Cola probalbly owns the other half of the products I find on the supermarket shelves.

I know that in ireland, they provide the coolers to the little stores with the proviso that they only can stock their products. Same with the big ice cream vendors. This means that local competition is beaten out.
Brian

From: Victoria Bc | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged
Farces
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12588

posted 31 July 2006 06:56 AM      Profile for Farces   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Adam T:
Market share
from oligopolywatch
(I think this is Canadian figures)
Coca Cola
44.1%
Coke, Sprite, Barq, Fanta, Mello Yello, etc.

Pepsico
31.4%
Pepsi, Mountain Dew, Mug, Slice, etc.

Cadbury/Schweppes
14.7%
Seven-Up, Dr. Pepper, Schweppes, A & W, Canada Dry, Sunkist, Squirt, etc.

Why has Canada brought no antitrust actions?

I wish the NDP would consider making a reinvigoration of antitrust a central plank of its political campaigns. In the grand scheme of things, I think these glaring antitrust problems are more important than the issues the party actually does campaign on.


From: 43°41' N79°38' W | Registered: May 2006  |  IP: Logged
Brian White
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8013

posted 31 July 2006 11:32 PM      Profile for Brian White   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
it is a fair point. Antitrust.
in ireland, (about 10 years ago) the legality of ice cream vendors giving little shops free freezers (but only if they are filled with that vendors product and no other) went to court and the big ice cream companys won. That killed off local brands of ice cream. So no upstarts to challenge the big boys ever. AND there were lots of local small scale cola companys too. But the big cola companys simply followed the example of the ice cream vendors and those local flavours went the way of the dodo pretty quickly after that. It is something to note for legislation here.

From: Victoria Bc | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged
Proaxiom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6188

posted 01 August 2006 05:19 AM      Profile for Proaxiom     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Brian, I think you're off base with criticizing advertising. What you are really complaining about is brand. Granted, advertising is the primary way of building a brand, but the distinction is important. People buy Coke and Pepsi because they have built a very strong brand.

We are all influenced by advertising, and brand does have real value beyond simple images and words.

But at the same time, we are not really mindless sheep. We still buy products that taste better (and yes, Coke and Pepsi do taste different). Read Blink by Malcolm Gladwell. He describes some fascinating research explaining how we make decisions in this regard.

In any case, if you object to brand monopolies, the answer has nothing to do with advertising. The government just has to abolish trademarks. That would change everything overnight.

[ 01 August 2006: Message edited by: Proaxiom ]


From: East of the Sun, West of the Moon | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
otter
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12062

posted 01 August 2006 04:33 PM      Profile for otter        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
We are all influenced by advertising, and brand does have real value beyond simple images and words.

You assume far too much. I for one am repelled by advertising and there are more than a few people who purchase items because they have done the research on which one best suits their needs.

Brand names are primarily for sheep and those people who have no identity of their own. But they can be a xxxxx owner or a yyyy groupie/consumer.

I remember a time when brand names gave away promotional items like hats and shirts with their logos. But the were soon inundated by the sheep who insisted upon paying for the items. Now they get free advertising from their sychopants and can even more profits from this form of marketing.

Bah!!!


From: agent provocateur inc. | Registered: Feb 2006  |  IP: Logged
Stephen Gordon
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4600

posted 01 August 2006 04:45 PM      Profile for Stephen Gordon        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by otter:

You assume far too much. I for one am repelled by advertising and there are more than a few people who purchase items because they have done the research on which one best suits their needs.

Brand names are primarily for sheep and those people who have no identity of their own. But they can be a xxxxx owner or a yyyy groupie/consumer.

I remember a time when brand names gave away promotional items like hats and shirts with their logos. But the were soon inundated by the sheep who insisted upon paying for the items. Now they get free advertising from their sychopants and can even more profits from this form of marketing.

Bah!!!


These sheep of whom you speak: should they be allowed to vote?


From: . | Registered: Oct 2003  |  IP: Logged
mayakovsky
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5171

posted 01 August 2006 04:58 PM      Profile for mayakovsky     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
It would be interesting to dispel trademarks. They don't only happen in the marketing of 'conventional' products. It happens in the health, alternative food market also. There is not a big difference between how these are marketed and any other product. Those with the most pull win and they want the 'concerned' to remember their product like anyone else. I worked in a health food store and their approach was no different than brewers trying to get their product into my dad's pub. Granted the soy dealers usually didn't have hockey tickets. Both marketers, sales reps want to eventually own the market. ie: when you think soy they want you to think Soydream. They would also work against local soy producers. Sad to say but I met someone today who told me his friends are opening an organic/health food store because marketing research told them it was a niche market.


otter, almost everything we buy is a brand even my favourite band is on a label.


From: New Bedford | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged
Lard Tunderin' Jeezus
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1275

posted 01 August 2006 05:21 PM      Profile for Lard Tunderin' Jeezus   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Can I show my age?

One of the things I miss most from my youth are the local soft drinks bottled in Petawawa by Giesebrecht's, under the Vitality brand, in clear glass bottles - particularly their own unique flavours, like Spruce Beer and Minted Grape. They had a store on the highway through town.

They were also the Pepsi bottler for the whole north and east of the province. When Pepsi moved to cans and began to ship themselves all over, Giesebrecht's lost the franchise, and shortly thereafter abandoned the business.

They continued to make fabulous ice cream for a decade or so, but now that's long gone, too. Replaced by over-sweet and under-flavoured crap like Hagen Das and Breyer's.

Fie on corporate foodstuffs.


From: ... | Registered: Aug 2001  |  IP: Logged
Proaxiom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6188

posted 01 August 2006 07:16 PM      Profile for Proaxiom     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by otter:
You assume far too much. I for one am repelled by advertising and there are more than a few people who purchase items because they have done the research on which one best suits their needs.

Brand names are primarily for sheep and those people who have no identity of their own. But they can be a xxxxx owner or a yyyy groupie/consumer.



I think many people who believe themselves immune to advertising would be surprised if they were objectively tested.

Doing research goes a long way in countering effects of brand and marketing, but do you really research every product you buy?

Seriously, you should read Blink. It references studies that show how the results of taste tests change when the tasters see the colour or the shape of the package the product came in. They actually report it tasting different. Results change dramatically when tasters see a brand name. The tasters were not consciously aware that they were biased. It turns out the subconscious really has a way of jerking us around, and we have no idea what's happening.

As I said, we're not helpless against marketing manipulation, though. Loading up with objective information can counteract the other stuff.


From: East of the Sun, West of the Moon | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
Brian White
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8013

posted 03 August 2006 12:09 AM      Profile for Brian White   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I remember my friend eamon from small town ireland trying to get a meal in mannheim germany.
he desperately wanted something familiar. Even as I pestered him to try a nice turkish lamb kabab, he was tranfixed by the familiar golden arches and his eyes never wavered from that vision of security.
I only knew the kebabs were good because my german friends took me there.
Sad but true.

From: Victoria Bc | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged
Jenny
recent-rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4714

posted 03 August 2006 06:06 AM      Profile for Jenny     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Brian White:
I remember my friend eamon from small town ireland trying to get a meal in mannheim germany.
he desperately wanted something familiar. Even as I pestered him to try a nice turkish lamb kabab, he was tranfixed by the familiar golden arches and his eyes never wavered from that vision of security.

I feel your friend's pain. I'm a very adventurous person, and I have to be, because my Greek husband's exceptional skills in the English language don't extend to translating what menu items mean. He's never had to learn english words for what food is, why would he, it's not something he'd use in business or anything My Greek language skills are slow to progress. Hence, when we go to a restaurant, half the time, things are hit and miss, if I try anything new.

Food in our city restaurants is generally quite good, but even the 'ethnic' food has a tendency to be 'Greekified', much the same as the ethnic food back home has surely been 'Canadianized'. The spices are different, the contents are different. And as much as I love it, sometimes, homesickness overwhelms me, and I want something familiar.

McDonalds is familiar. I hate the corporate culture, in fact, I really don't like -our- McDonalds. But still, we go there, because it's a taste of home for me. (They do have Greek Mac and Greek Chicken items, both have pitas instead of buns)

If franchises/brand names of this sort appeal even to adventuresome brave folks, imagine how it would be for people with kids that were picky, or people that were worried about eating in a foreign country. There's something to be said for the familiarity of franchising, you always know what you're getting, a Big Mac is a Big Mac, a McFlurry is a McFlurry. Apple pies here are not the same, they're actual slices of apple pie, but I digress.

(Recently, I discovered a city full of resorts near us, that cater to a mostly British crowd. People speak English everywhere, and they speak it well. Restaurants serve roast beef dinners with yorkshire pudding, and shepherd's pie! It may soon replace McDonald's as my food homesickness remedy of choice )


From: Heraklion, Crete, Greece | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca