Author
|
Topic: The ridiculous compartmentalism of Babble
|
downtime
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2887
|
posted 15 September 2008 04:12 PM
I haven't been on babble for some time, but no matter how much I sometime enjoy it, the eastern, urban, simple conceptualisation, always shines thru. There is such a thing as regions in this country. The usual divisions are BC, the prairies, the northern territories, Ontario, Quebec and the Maritimes. No matter what some little urban Toronto twit designed the sections in babble, these are accepted designations, responding to shared, to some extent common values reinforced by the environment. Alberta is somewhat of an anamoly because of the massive influence of US immigration going back to the northern movement of cattle ranchers and later oil industry workers, but northern Alberta is definitely canadian prairie. As a Manitoban If I want to appeal to prairie people in babble, I have to post to 2 sections, which for those north of the Sioux (an abandoned region) and those in western Alberta is of marginal interest, not to mention it's engulphment in posts from southern Ontario or Quebec. Even including these 2 populous provinces along with Manitoba shows a certain contempt for all 3, and ignores any sense of Quebec as a nation. Downtime
From: central Manitoba | Registered: Jul 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
oldgoat
Moderator
Babbler # 1130
|
posted 16 September 2008 06:07 PM
quote: No matter what some little urban Toronto twit designed the sections in babble,
Well, I guess I could get defensive about that, but I guess the best comback I have is "who ya callin' little!?" The initial compartmentalisation probably represented a compromise following a long and tedious discussion way back in the day, and has evolved a bit over the years, and I think we always try to see it as a work in progress. Constructive input is actually welcome. Personally, I like simplicity. I also like to be able to find things. We try to keep it practical rather than political. Were your initial characterisation true, it would simply be Toronto and everywhere else.
From: The 10th circle | Registered: Jul 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Malcolm
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5168
|
posted 16 September 2008 11:08 PM
As a person who has lived in Nova Scotia, Ontario, Manitoba, Saskatchewan, Alberta and BC (though some of those very briefly), I've always thought the way the regional fora were divided was frankly nutty.There are two options that make sense: 1) separate fora for each province / territory, or 2) generally recognized regions - Atlantic, Quebec, Ontario, Prairies, BC, North. (Separating Prairies and BC makes more sense to me, but putting them together as West would be fine. Putting Quebec, Ontario and Manitoba together is stupid beyond words. Open the new ones, Michelle. Archive the old ones. Copy the small number of threads active over, say, the last month.
From: Regina, SK | Registered: Mar 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
al-Qa'bong
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3807
|
posted 18 September 2008 02:48 PM
quote: Originally posted by Michelle:
Not to get too defensive here, but FYI, neither oldgoat or I came up with the current configuration.
I guess the configuration is the fault of some different southern Ontarian. Sorry to raise your defences, by the way. I've caused the mods enough trouble lately without adding false accusations to my list of trespasses.
From: Saskatchistan | Registered: Feb 2003
| IP: Logged
|
|
Left Turn
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8662
|
posted 19 September 2008 01:10 AM
quote: Originally posted by Michelle: We have discussed changing the regional forums in the way suggested here. However, the issue is that we'd have to go through seven years of threads and move them to the new forums. And with this software, that means moving each thread individually. If we didn't move them, then we wouldn't be able to find threads from four years ago very easily.So far, the money hasn't been raised for the extra 5,000 moderating hours this would take. So we figured it would just be easier to leave it as is.
Michelle, would it be possible to revamp the configuration of the regional forums when we move to the Drupal software? As long as we are not moving the old posts to the drupal software, it should be easy to set up the regional forums on the Drupal software to be: BC The Praries Ontario Quebec Atlantic Canada The North (the three territories)
From: Burnaby, BC | Registered: Mar 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Boom Boom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7791
|
posted 19 September 2008 07:06 AM
quote: Originally posted by GOD: I don't think Body and Soul should be under one forum. Let's have a Body one and a Soul one.
Let's ignore the Almighty and keep things as they are. quote: I can volunteer to moderate the Soul forum if you like.
This isn't a conflict of interest to you, being the Almighty and all?
From: Make the rich pay! | Registered: Dec 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
downtime
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2887
|
posted 29 September 2008 05:42 PM
Well ignoring the facetious attempts to be humorous by those from the "big smoky" this IS an issue with most prairie people. It has an historical context to many of us out here where most of the overpriced manufactured goods arrived from Ontario and was also the seat of financal power which caused the ruin of many homesteaders. It is also the root of the animosity to Ontario and especally Toronto. It was out here where the Co-op movement and the CCF was born until it was taken over by Ontario social workers and the trade-union elite to form the NDP. Many of it's tenets were adopted by northern Ontarions who still don't feel comfortable with the southern region, which shows in it's different voting patterns. Joke however you like, but there is a cmmonality of common interest between peoples of the prairies and to some extent northern Ontario and which excludes the proto-American oil-kings of southern Alberta. I posted an URL of a prairie journalist's articles, of necessity, to 2 different sections and was accused by Michelle of "duplicate-posting". How else, pray tell, can I get a message out to like-minded progrssive "prairie people" who live in this region of Canada. Similarly, the presently urban-dominated NDP has yet to issue any really comprehesive rural agricultural policies to appeal to the prairies despite the roots of the CCF in this region and the disatisfaction with such polices as the Conservatives attempt to kill the Wheat Board (even the local conservative is, of necessity, against it) Oh, and just to put myself in categories some people on this forum seem comfortable with: I am a "white, over-50 male". But I have children and grand-children "of color". Shades of Black. chew on that. I declared them "Irish" when confronted with the question of national origin on birth registry forms, as is traditional in canadian decent from the male parent. [ 29 September 2008: Message edited by: downtime ] [ 29 September 2008: Message edited by: downtime ] [ 29 September 2008: Message edited by: downtime ]
From: central Manitoba | Registered: Jul 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
RevolutionPlease
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14629
|
posted 29 September 2008 07:27 PM
quote: Originally posted by downtime: How else, pray tell, can I get a message out to like-minded progrssive "prairie people" who live in this region of Canada.
I thought you might have a point until I read this: quote: Oh, and just to put myself in categories some people on this forum seem comfortable with: I am a "white, over-50 male". But I have children and grand-children "of color". Shades of Black. chew on that. I declared them "Irish" when confronted with the question of national origin on birth registry forms, as is traditional in canadian decent from the male parent.
It's descent BTW. [ 29 September 2008: Message edited by: RevolutionPlease ] edited to fix quotes [ 29 September 2008: Message edited by: RevolutionPlease ]
From: Aurora | Registered: Oct 2007
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
al-Qa'bong
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3807
|
posted 30 September 2008 04:22 PM
quote: Well ignoring the facetious attempts to be humorous by those from the "big smoky" ...
Oh, that's what was going on. I admit I've been puzzled by statements like this: quote: And I try to not go north of Bloor, man. Yonge and Eligible is for suburbanites playing at living in the city.
Ya mean down east you give your roads names, just like they were pets or kinfolk? If that don't beat all. I heard stories, rumours really, that you even have a way of covering your roads with a mixture of gravel and oil to make them waterproof, so that when it rains your buggies don't sink up to their axles in mud.
From: Saskatchistan | Registered: Feb 2003
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
RevolutionPlease
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14629
|
posted 30 September 2008 07:53 PM
quote: Originally posted by downtime: Did I lose my "point" because I was a white over-50 male of Irish descent or because of the bad spelling ? Strange criteria for logic. :^)) I'm sure in this enlightened forum it wouldn't be because the mother of my 4 sons was afro-american. I find it a bit amusing in an ironic way that all my "Irish" progeny should forever-on be labelled as "persons of color". Perhaps my great-grandchildren will be able to pass inspection in this supposedly "tolerant" society. Who in hell wants to be "tolerated" anyway.
Feel that way if you'd like, I'm just not sure why you're trying to make a point of it here. This is bigger than your immediate family.
From: Aurora | Registered: Oct 2007
| IP: Logged
|
|
downtime
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2887
|
posted 01 October 2008 01:38 PM
quote: Originally posted by RevolutionPlease:
Feel that way if you'd like, I'm just not sure why you're trying to make a point of it here. This is bigger than your immediate family.
I included that as a "point" of the existence of ageist, racist(anti-white overtones are also racist), and urban arrogance, which occurs in many of the sections of forums unopposed. I included my family history in case you were implying that I was a white, over-50, honky, thereby invalidating any valid "points" I might have made.
From: central Manitoba | Registered: Jul 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rebecca West
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1873
|
posted 02 October 2008 09:11 AM
quote: Originally posted by downtime: It was out here where the Co-op movement and the CCF was born until it was taken over by Ontario social workers and the trade-union elite to form the NDP. Many of it's tenets were adopted by northern Ontarions who still don't feel comfortable with the southern region, which shows in it's different voting patterns.
You make some very valid points. Too bad they come with a lot of loaded assumptions about the moderators and organizers of this board and where they're located. Okay, yeah, I get it - you have nothing but contempt for Toronto and anyone who lives there. Totally understandable, since where one lives is somehow revealing of character, or lack thereof. Now, if I believed that, then everyone from the prairies would be an angry, defensive blow-hard who exploits his racially diverse relatives to add some kind of 'cred' to his membership in the overwhelmingly dominant culture of this country. Well, gosh by golly, that would hardly be fair, would it? Especially since I know it to be quite untrue. Mostly ;) Personally, spewing bitter vitriol and insulting the people I'm asking something of has never gotten me very far. Perhaps you've had more success with this tactic? At any rate, the moderators here - despite being crippled by proximity to a large city in Central Canada - are quite helpful, hard-working people who, I am sure, will do whatever limited time and budget will allow to continue to improve the quality of this site.
From: London , Ontario - homogeneous maximus | Registered: Nov 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
bagkitty
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 15443
|
posted 02 October 2008 09:40 AM
quote: Originally posted by Stargazer: Class act that downtime. BTW, I think it is a big mistake to put Alberta in with any province. Alberta should have its own forum. There is nothing similar between that province and Manitoba politically and I don't think the people from Winnipeg would like to be lumped in with Alberta.
Can we call it the room of ritual shame?
From: Calgary | Registered: Aug 2008
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
downtime
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2887
|
posted 02 October 2008 09:38 PM
Wow ! If I could possibly comprehend what you are trying to express it might empower me. However, my "ostentatious white privelege" was of a railway working class person dealing with racism from both sdes of the racial divide, with even more problems of obtaining housing than most "people of color". My pride is not of my pigmentation but of overcoming that criteria which you would have me decry. Of the struggles to support and transmit to my "non-white" kids when they came home crying about being called "blackie" or later "Zebra" or "Oreos" that it was simply ignorance or racism which was hurtful and divided working people who created the "wonders" of Thebes. And many times succeeding in my explainations. One of my greatest feelngs was when one of my sons was into a brawl when we lived in Montreal and because he returned the basketball to the french school next door to the protestant school he went to. I don't know whether or not your login name suggests your racial origins. You could be simply a poseur. My anti-racist history is impeccable and in the Toronto SUPA march against the events in Selma, Alabama, My wife and infant son were the only afro-americans in it. When I later brought that up to afro-american friends, they admitted there was a fear of stirring up the situation. Later on the largest black march in canadaian history, following the assassination of Martin Luther King, took place in Montreal, and was initiated in my front room. Those like you attempt to gain power by evoking guilt. I don't play your game. I remember slick characters who would follow Stokely Carmichel around and gain sexual and financial favors from self-abnegating students. They were very slick, your an amateur. Do you really know anything about frst-nation culture or attitudes ? It's a crock. I was born out here and like many areas of the world it was invaded. It was about power and native people were decimated by it, includng Louis Riel, a "white" man. At one time it was inconceivable that a person could own the land, much less the air or water. Now many cheifs do own that, while many of their people starve. And of course in Africa most of the slave trade was maintained by chiefs and Muslim traders. Do you also take that responsability ? I guess your challenge to not post to the anti-racist forum is based on your own questionable validity. Sooner or later, i'mcumngImcummnggg. Out with the phonies. This post and topc has obvously no relation to the thread, but I'm sure Michelle will transfer it to where it should be, however troublesome I mght be. These quebecois ladies are cool. At times. quote: Originally posted by Makwa: Your family history is of little interest to me, except to engender some sorrow that non-white family members have had to learn to survive with someone who displays so much ostentatious white privilege with such obvious pride. To declaim the mythology of the 'benighted homesteader' who has profited for hundreds of years off land stolen from the First Nations, and to callously describe your unfortunate progeny as "shades of Black - chew on that!" while bragging that you thereafter deemed them to be "Irish" thereby casting aside their unique histories as multiracial Canadians, suffices to invalidate any point you may think you are making. All I can do is ask you please, please never to post in the Anti-Racist forum.
[ 02 October 2008: Message edited by: downtime ] [ 02 October 2008: Message edited by: downtime ]
From: central Manitoba | Registered: Jul 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Tommy_Paine
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 214
|
posted 03 October 2008 02:36 PM
quote: Good thing those provinces are so dull nothing ever happens there.
It is said that durring the long tenure of Bill Davis as Premier of Ontario, a reporter remarked to him that his style, if a winning one, was rather bland. To which Davis responded, "Bland works". Now, around that time things were not terribly dull or bland at Fleck manufacturing, where Bill and the terrible tories were using the OPP as a private strike breaking force, but to the pundits, everything was dull as dull could be. Anyway, old story not terribly important to anything. May we all live in interesting times. Strikes me though, and has for a long time, how we on the left of things like to organize ourselves into finer and finer distinctions. We could have province specific forums, but I give it thirty seconds before someone complains that Nordern Hontario should have it's own forum separate and distinct from dose guys in Sudern Hontario. Then, I am a cult of one on this. I've always thought "Forum" kind of implied that, through discussion, we find how our regional or individual concerns fit in the context of the whole, thereby finding strength through common interest.
From: The Alley, Behind Montgomery's Tavern | Registered: Apr 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
jrootham
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 838
|
posted 03 October 2008 02:51 PM
quote: Originally posted by bigcitygal: Dude I went to York University before there was Downsview Station! For eight years!We took an "express" bus from Wilson! Wilson I tell you!
I used to visit my sister at York before there was Wilson. Bus from Lansdowne. Now THAT was a haul.
From: Toronto | Registered: Jun 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
Tommy_Paine
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 214
|
posted 03 October 2008 02:57 PM
Perfect spin, too. During those bland times, Reed paper poisoned the Native people of Grassy Narrows with mercury. And Bill Davis wanted to reward Reed Paper with the largest clear cut to that time ever given by the province.Make no mistake, that bland, cuddly old guy with the pipe is a mean, nasty, viscious psycho. Instructive times, though. Many of the rights workers have today came from that era-- thanks to the Stephen Lewis opposition in a minority government. And it was the same NDP opposition that scuttled the Reed paper clear cut. And introduced rent controls. More than five years of NDP majority government under Bob Rae ever did for us. I'm rambling. But it's instructive on the nature of political power, and how it doesn't all rest at the legislatures.
From: The Alley, Behind Montgomery's Tavern | Registered: Apr 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
George Victor
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14683
|
posted 04 October 2008 06:17 AM
quote: Ken, Downtime no longer exists.
That is the most menacing posting that I have seen, anywhere! I hope that it is easily explainable, oldgoat.
From: Cambridge, ON | Registered: Oct 2007
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
George Victor
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14683
|
posted 04 October 2008 08:15 AM
Given that the guy seemed to be suffering from stress, and his posts probably represented an appeal for help, your action may have been just a bit abrupt? quote: Ken, Downtime no longer exists.
He probably still exists, as a 74-year-old looking to find some meaning in the present by relating to a past activism...and, like many of us, wondering at the gap between statements of concern for others and their actual treatment.
Or do I have an over-active imagination, in your god-like estimation, and your puerile explanation does not emanate from a bag-of- hammers sensibility?
From: Cambridge, ON | Registered: Oct 2007
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Ken Burch
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8346
|
posted 04 October 2008 08:59 AM
Sorry, oldgoat, didn't know the axe had fallen on old downers.Have now deleted the entry in question. [ 04 October 2008: Message edited by: Ken Burch ]
From: A seedy truckstop on the Information Superhighway | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
George Victor
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14683
|
posted 06 October 2008 09:11 AM
quote: Sorry, oldgoat, didn't know the axe had fallen on old downers.
The block has to be prepared before the executioner does his work. That was the work of all of the sensitive souls who parodied his attempts to talk in serious terms about the politics of this country and its past, and a personal history offered up in an attempt to explain a different perspective - jeering rather than inviting answers to questions in the name of enlightenment.
Hope it doesn't portend even more exclusionary actions to come! All quite frightening, really. Tribalistic.
From: Cambridge, ON | Registered: Oct 2007
| IP: Logged
|
|
bagkitty
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 15443
|
posted 06 October 2008 09:31 AM
quote: Originally posted by Ken Burch: On the subject of Babble regional reorganization, how about putting Alberta in a "Texas and Northern Texas" forum?That's pretty much what Alberta Tories would want, anyway.
I can totally get behind that, and promise to stay out of the Central Canadian Overlords (In Sight of the World's Tallest Freestanding Concrete Penis) forum when the name changes come into effect. Oh and oldgoat, thanks for lending me that cup of solipsism... the recipe wouldn't have worked without it.
From: Calgary | Registered: Aug 2008
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
George Victor
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14683
|
posted 08 October 2008 04:28 AM
Anger makes us drop in a word or two for effect.My use of "tribalistic" was intended to be the standard dictionary one (now that I look it up in my Oxford) : "loyalty to one's own tribe or social group." I hope that others are looking it up as well, but I would really appreciate seeing just a smidgen (Canadian Oxford, a small amount) of attention given to the object of the thread, not just the final offending word. In fact, every time I re-read the entire thread, I'm convinced that it is not I who should be explaining - and I'm certainly not apologizing. How about it, all you sensitive types. Wasn't there just a smidgen of insensitity at play in response to the old guy's attempts to communicate something?
From: Cambridge, ON | Registered: Oct 2007
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Caissa
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12752
|
posted 10 October 2008 03:53 AM
You mean 971 CE don't you? ETA: Your use of Anno Domini for the 10th century of the Common Era seems a bit anachronistic. Courtesy of Wikipedia:Though the Anno Domini dating system was devised in 525, it was not until the 8th century that the system began to be adopted in Western Europe. According to the Catholic Encyclopedia, even popes continued to date documents according to regnal years, and usage of AD only gradually became more common in Europe from the 11th to the 14th centuries [ 10 October 2008: Message edited by: Caissa ]
From: Saint John | Registered: Jun 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|