Author
|
Topic: Kruschev
|
|
|
DrConway
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 490
|
posted 26 March 2003 04:21 AM
Keep your pants on. He often loved to play up his peasant origins when he was talking with foreign dignitaries. A quote, possibly apocryphal, runs something like this: "Gentlemen, you have been to Harvard, the Sorbonne, Eton, all these fancy universities, yet I, a muzhik from the Donets Basin, have run rings around you. Why is that?"Incidentally, Khruschev's education was a bit more than rudimentary, since he was able to get a technical education after the Revolution and he got a job as a pipefitter. It is true, however, that his plans to go on for further training were disrupted as his Soviet political career began, and by the time World War 2 came along he was a member of the Politburo, and one of the only ones, as I recall, who was sent to the front lines in the Ukraine in order to coordinate the Soviet defense (and later, offense) from an up close and personal perspective. I have often thought that these years in battle were what decisively turned him against Stalin, although he didn't hate Stalin yet. That wasn't for some years, when he began to resent bitterly the way Stalin would make fun of his Ukrainian background and make him dance the gopak. None of Khrushchev's compatriots on the Politburo ever saw up close the dangers of war and the consequences of Stalin's micromanaging interference in the war. But so many times Khrushchev saw how a countermanding order from Stalin nearly cost his battle unit's chances for survival. Khrushchev was a remarkable person in so many ways. A man who had never travelled outside the USSR's borders before becoming Premier of the Soviet Union (and later, General Secretary) nevertheless saw that a different way was needed - a way not based on unrelenting terror and fear - to govern the Soviet Union and that there might be a possible path to peace between the US and the USSR. Most of all, he gathered the courage to be the first person to expose Stalin's crimes, although by today's standards his exposure was incomplete and insufficient. This was the lasting legacy of the Twentieth Communist Party Congress: it seeded the next generation of Soviet leaders who would one day see their chance to try and make things right under Gorbachev.
From: You shall not side with the great against the powerless. | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
clockwork
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 690
|
posted 26 March 2003 04:21 AM
I'd automatically respond that what you heard was pop psychology. I have no proof of this, but I'd theorize that smart people can be bad spellers just as dumb ones can too.You only need to work with a bunch of factory workers and to know a few professors to understand that. edited: my post is to Adam Smiths [ 26 March 2003: Message edited by: clockwork ]
From: Pokaroo! | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|