babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » right brain babble   » humanities & science   » Google delivers a limited view of the world

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Google delivers a limited view of the world
Geneva
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3808

posted 18 July 2003 05:36 AM      Profile for Geneva     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
surprise, it has a distinct bias:

http://slate.msn.com/id/2085668/

[ 18 July 2003: Message edited by: Geneva ]


From: um, well | Registered: Feb 2003  |  IP: Logged
Gir Draxon
leftist-rightie and rightist-leftie
Babbler # 3804

posted 18 July 2003 05:48 AM      Profile for Gir Draxon     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
bias, or technical flaw?

It does not appear that google is intentionally doing those things, rather the number of shopping sites is due to pure volume and quirks in their system.

Google evil? I don't think so.

Google not infallible? well DUH


From: Arkham Asylum | Registered: Feb 2003  |  IP: Logged
Geneva
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3808

posted 18 July 2003 07:57 AM      Profile for Geneva     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I am not using the word bias in any political/ ideological sense, just that say, PDF docs are clearly favoured for access over books, and open Web docs/blogs/sites over pay sites (ex: NY Times)

makes quite a difference for what you find on the Web, esp. when Google is being hyped everywhere as the place to find "everything"


From: um, well | Registered: Feb 2003  |  IP: Logged
Lima Bean
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3000

posted 18 July 2003 12:10 PM      Profile for Lima Bean   Author's Homepage        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Doesn't a google search just offer up the most popular sites with the keywords you typed into the search engine in order of popularity?
From: s | Registered: Aug 2002  |  IP: Logged
clockwork
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 690

posted 18 July 2003 12:22 PM      Profile for clockwork     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
http://www.google.com/technology/
From: Pokaroo! | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
primus-d
recent-rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1231

posted 22 July 2003 06:56 AM      Profile for primus-d     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
while i'm an avid proponent of google as the one-stop-shop for 'most' web search needs, inevitably it has its natural limitations. that said, i don't doubt for a sec many a folk spend much time trying to trick the algorithm.

it's all about knowing what you're looking for and which search engine to use to find it...


From: Geneva | Registered: Aug 2001  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 22 July 2003 07:58 AM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
It just offers you the most popular sites for the keywords.

For instance, if you want to find web sites about apples, the fruit, then type "apple fruit" into google and you'll get information about apples rather than computers.

With tulips, you do get a lot of stores, but a lot of those retailers also have information pages about care and growing of tulips as well, and those come up when you type "tulips". You can get better information when you type "tulips growing". And if you want technical, scientific stuff about it, I'll bet if you type "tulips biology" you'll get it.

You just have to know how to use a search engine properly. It doesn't take much imagination to figure out that probably most of the internet traffic on tulips is from people who want to buy them online. You have to take that into account.


From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Cougyr
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3336

posted 22 July 2003 10:21 PM      Profile for Cougyr     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The biggest google bias comes from users. Sites that get the most hits get pushed to the front of the list. This is particularly true of Google's news page. And since most searchers and most sites are American, . . . . . . Nobody is to blame here. I have the Google News page as my home page. It's useful, but limited.

I have a terrible time using search engines. I get too much junk back. I would love to have geographically based searches. If your water heater failed and you needed a new one, would you really want the hits from a "water heater" search? I'd get the Yellow Pages and look for the nearest supplier.

At the very least, I'd like to add "canadian" and eliminate any and all hits from outside Canada. My wife tried to find out about "canadian perrenials" and got hits from as far away as Brazil.


From: over the mountain | Registered: Nov 2002  |  IP: Logged
Cougyr
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3336

posted 23 July 2003 12:46 PM      Profile for Cougyr     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I just did a search for "kenmore refrigerator diagnostics". The very first hit was "Kenmore Dryer Diagnostics". AAAAAAAAAGGGHHHHH!!!!! This stuff drives me crazy. The search engine doesn't know the difference between a refrigerator and a dryer.

What is it about the designers of search engines that they let junk float to the top?


From: over the mountain | Registered: Nov 2002  |  IP: Logged
Mr. Magoo
guilty-pleasure
Babbler # 3469

posted 23 July 2003 12:55 PM      Profile for Mr. Magoo   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Try Altavista. It lets you easily force or exclude search terms with + and -.

For example, if you like to shoot a little pool, you might type in +"pool", which will force the search to only return pages with the word "pool" in them. Only you're also getting all kinds of swimming/backyard recreation stuff too. So you try +"pool" +"billiards" to get only pages that mention both. Only now you're getting a bunch of motels with pool tables and swimming pools. Try forcing a term or two out, which will only return pages which don't have certain words in them. For example, +"pool" +"billiards" -"swim" -"chlorine" -"water". For good measure, you might want to subtract out -"gene" -"betting" -"car" as well. Sooner or later you've got a nice list of pretty relevant hits.


From: ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø, | Registered: Dec 2002  |  IP: Logged
paxamillion
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2836

posted 23 July 2003 12:58 PM      Profile for paxamillion   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The Web contains far more exceptions than a designer can continually address.
From: the process of recovery | Registered: Jul 2002  |  IP: Logged
Courage
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3980

posted 23 July 2003 01:19 PM      Profile for Courage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Google delivers a limited view of the world

No! Egads!


From: Earth | Registered: Apr 2003  |  IP: Logged
Sara Mayo
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3714

posted 23 July 2003 01:27 PM      Profile for Sara Mayo     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Your school delivers a limited view of the world.
Your parents deliver a limited view of the world.
TV delivers a limited view of the world.
Rabble and Babble deliver a limited view of the world.
The Internet delivers a limited view of the world.

From: "Highways are monuments to inequality" - Enrique Penalosa | Registered: Feb 2003  |  IP: Logged
Sara Mayo
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3714

posted 23 July 2003 01:33 PM      Profile for Sara Mayo     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
(Sorry for the double post)
quote:
Try Altavista. It lets you easily force or exclude search terms with + and -.

You can do the same thing with Google and most other search engines.

Michelle's tips are bang on for getting what you want out of a search engine. You just have to think of the relevant words that would be (and not be) on the page you are looking for.

quote:
I just did a search for "kenmore refrigerator diagnostics". The very first hit was "Kenmore Dryer Diagnostics".

If the results aren't what you're looking for, try using different key words. I searched on "kenmore refrigerator repair" and the first four hits look like they are what you want. Or try "kenmore refrigerator diagnostics -dryer" to exclude any sites mentionning dryers.

quote:
At the very least, I'd like to add "canadian" and eliminate any and all hits from outside Canada. My wife tried to find out about "canadian perrenials" and got hits from as far away as Brazil.

Try using google.ca and click on "pages from Canada". "Canadian perrenials" yields 165 hits, but if you limit it to canadian sites you get 26, the first from canadiangardening.com (by the way, the hit count is low because of a spelling mistake, thankfully google suggests the right spelling if it notices a mistake).

quote:
If your water heater failed and you needed a new one, would you really want the hits from a "water heater" search? I'd get the Yellow Pages and look for the nearest supplier.

To get the information you want you have to use the tool specialized for the type of info your searching. The yellow pages, or yellowpages.ca (with links to companies websites) is absolutely better for your example. Nobody claims that Google should replace all other kinds of information sournces.

[ 23 July 2003: Message edited by: Sara Mayo ]


From: "Highways are monuments to inequality" - Enrique Penalosa | Registered: Feb 2003  |  IP: Logged
Cougyr
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3336

posted 23 July 2003 02:55 PM      Profile for Cougyr     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
You just have to think of the relevant words . . . . . .

I know. Trouble is, I'm terrible at that.


From: over the mountain | Registered: Nov 2002  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca