Author
|
Topic: Beaches - East York
|
|
Reality. Bites.
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6718
|
posted 06 January 2006 08:41 PM
I can't help but think that if the Liberals are even slightly down, that Beaches and Trinity Spadina are as close to sure things as can be, except of course for Danforth. Of course I don't live in either riding or have any knowledge of the actual campaigns. For what it's worth, Greg at democraticspace.com still has Beaches for the Liberals and TS in the air. He has the NDP picking up two Hamilton seats in addition to the one held now.
From: Gone for good | Registered: Aug 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Reality. Bites.
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6718
|
posted 06 January 2006 09:06 PM
quote: Originally posted by Privateer: I don't think we can ever call a "sure thing" in Toronto.
That's why I said "as close as possible" to a sure thing. I'm very aware of what overconfidence did last time - for a while I was even starting to think Michael Shapcott had a shot in Toronto Centre.
From: Gone for good | Registered: Aug 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Reality. Bites.
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6718
|
posted 06 January 2006 09:53 PM
quote: Originally posted by ctrl190:
Didn't Shapcott lose by over 12 000 votes? That is much more than an abrupt strategic NDP-turn-Lib vote.
Oh yes, it was totally naive on my part - but he ran a much better campaign than Graham. I received literature several times and he was way ahead in the sign war. Haven't received a thing from anyone this time.
From: Gone for good | Registered: Aug 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Reality. Bites.
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6718
|
posted 07 January 2006 05:37 AM
quote: Originally posted by Scott Piatkowski: It was definitely going to be a lot closer than it ended up being. And it's definitely going to be a lot closer this time.
There don't seem to be as many resources going into the riding as this time. As I said, I haven't received a single flyer. This is fine with me, if those resources are going into more winnable ridings.
From: Gone for good | Registered: Aug 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
Scott Piatkowski
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1299
|
posted 09 January 2006 05:52 AM
quote: Originally posted by me: So, who else has reports about Beaches? And how long will it take Maria Minna's Mini-Me to put up to refute any reports that say she's losing?
Linking to this blog posting should bring him back for sure Iñaki Mondragon quote: In 2003, the Ottawa Hill Times documented the existence of Maria Minna’s trust fund: “[O]thers have and had trust funds, including Alfonso Gagliano, Raymond Lavigne, and Maria Minna.” I have already commented on this blog about the problematic nature of the trust funds of two other Toronto Liberals, Tony Ianno, and Art Eggleton. Trust funds allow MPs to raise unlimited amounts of money under the table from undisclosed donors, and the MPs do not have to account for how they spent their money. Therefore, the voters of Toronto deserve answers to the following three questions: - Who donated to Maria Minna’s trust fund?
- Does Maria Minna still maintain a trust fund?
- How has Maria Minna spent the money in his trust fund?
All Canadians also deserve to know the answer to the following question: Did Transelec Inc. donate to Maria Minna’s trust fund? Here’s the scoop on Transelec Inc. and CIDA, where Maria Minna was minister... Greater transparency can only strengthen our democracy, if not necessarily the Liberal Party of Canada.
[ 09 January 2006: Message edited by: Scott Piatkowski ]
From: Kitchener-Waterloo | Registered: Sep 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Scott Piatkowski
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1299
|
posted 09 January 2006 12:56 PM
Wow, seven hours. Very impressive.Has The Hill Times published a retraction? Has The National Post? Have you asked for one from either paper? How did the media come to have the impression that Maria Minna had a trust fund? Why doesn't the riding association post a list of contributors, so voters can see where the $70,000 came from? Care to comment on Minna's association with Mr. Cash-Filled-Envelope, Michel Beliveau? quote: CIDA's position changed last fall after a lobbying campaign by Michel Beliveau, a senior Quebec Liberal connected to Transelec and to the Prime Minister. Mr. Beliveau was not registered as a lobbyist at the time.In a Sept. 3, 2001, letter to Modibo Sidibe, Mali's Foreign Affairs Minister, Canadian diplomat Andre Cliche wrote that Canada is prepared to finance a settlement of the Transelec dispute -- using other Canadian foreign aid funds allocated for Mali -- but only after Transelec's cost-overrun claim is verified by SNC- Lavalin, the Montreal engineering firm that oversaw the project. The about-face came after Mr. Beliveau, who was an employee of Transelec, arranged for Transelec executives to meet senior CIDA officials in Montreal last year, and after the office of the Minister responsible for CIDA intervened in the matter, the documents show.
From the blog comments quote: Michel Beliveau. Where have I heard that name before?http://tinyurl.com/b67l6 "Also in his testimony, Corbeil alleged that he received other under-the-table donations. He claimed to have once received an envelope stuffed with $5,000 in cash from his former boss, Michel Beliveau, Corbeil's predecessor as head of the Liberals' Quebec wing. He alleged to have been given the money to help his party get a "leg up" in the hotly contested post-referendum election campaign. The money was passed along to organizers in the Montreal riding of Bourassa -- the seat eventually won by Denis Coderre. ... Corbeil also alleged that Beliveau gave him a second envelope of $4,000 for an east-end Montreal riding won by Liberal Yvonne Charbonneau. ... Last week, Beliveau told the inquiry he gave Corbeil up to $100,000 earmarked for several ridings the Liberals were desperate to wrest from opposition parties. The money, he said at the time, came from Jacques Corriveau." Oh my.
From: Kitchener-Waterloo | Registered: Sep 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
candle
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3103
|
posted 09 January 2006 01:03 PM
Babbler #1299 - I think the rearrival of Babbler #10579 occurred faster than any of us thought.Your Truly, Babbler #3103.
From: Ontario | Registered: Sep 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
radiorahim
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2777
|
posted 10 January 2006 12:56 AM
quote: Babbler #1299 - I think the rearrival of Babbler #10579 occurred faster than any of us thought.
If #10579 is spending time online rather than stuffing envelopes or answering phones in the campaign office things must be going very badly for Maria Minna. No doubt Paulie's performance tonight in the debate will have the folks in the office even more depressed tomorrow morning. How bad is it there #10579 ?
From: a Micro$oft-free computer | Registered: Jun 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
jiminy2
recent-rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11500
|
posted 10 January 2006 04:39 AM
Having proven that I legitimately resemble Jim Harris, I therefore will speak for him/me here as his alter ago. AS JIM I have this to say about MY riding which you NDPers have invaded from Toronto-Danforth: I invaded first! Because I am on TV way too much, people might vote for me. People vote for party leaders! Therefore it sucks to be you. It might also suck to be me but I will never admit it. Here is my suggestion: I did not write my party's platform, my Shadow Cabinet did. There is lots of good stuff in there I don't agree with. Find out what it is and bring it up in debates. Ask me if I will run the country the way I ran my Council in 2005. Ask me about my part in it - after all I told the Canadian Press that "I lead the party. I don't manage the party." And that was a big fat lie! Also make sure you know every detail of my legitimate biography. There are dozens of references there to check out from all sorts of people who know me. With all that, you can take away two points from my vote (not my hair! leave me that! it's all I'll have left, after this election!) and win in a close race. You might take more points away. I don't care, all I care about is the $1.75 and being on TV. That's really truly all I care about. Everything else I learned to get on TV!
From: Toronto | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iñaki Mondragon
recent-rabble-rouser
Babbler # 10921
|
posted 11 January 2006 03:28 PM
Here's another Minna fundraising tidbit:In the 2000 election, Maria Minna's second largest corporate donor was Canaccord Capital Corporation ($5,000). Canaccord made no other donations during the 2000 campaign. During the 2004 Conservative leadership race, guess who was Stephen Harper's largest corporate donor? That's right, Canaccord Capital Corporation ($30,000)! While in office, Maria Minna voted for the largest tax cuts in Canadian history, as well as the sharpest cuts, ever, to the Canadian government.
Registered: Nov 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|