babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » right brain babble   » humanities & science   » Bush's Religiosity: Faith influencing Policy

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Bush's Religiosity: Faith influencing Policy
TemporalHominid
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6535

posted 30 July 2004 02:11 PM      Profile for TemporalHominid   Author's Homepage        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Does G.W. Bush see himself as Chosen By God to sit in the President's office at the time of Christ's 2nd coming? Did he invade Iraq (Babylon) to help bring about his interpretations of Revelation's prohesies?

Is G.W. Bush delusional? Do his fantasies direct policy, thus affecting the lives of millions of people?

[ 30 July 2004: Message edited by: TemporalHominid ]


From: Under a bridge, in Foot Muck | Registered: Jul 2004  |  IP: Logged
Cougyr
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3336

posted 30 July 2004 05:55 PM      Profile for Cougyr     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by TemporalHominid:
Is G.W. Bush delusional? Do his fantasies direct policy, thus affecting the lives of millions of people?

Yup. And, I believe most of his supporters to be delusional. But, I don't hold any hope for Kerry & the Democrats who are also delusional and desire to foist their own fantasies on people. I think it's highly unlikely to find any non-delusional individual who would want to be President of the US, or most other countries. To begin with, he/she would have to tell the truth.


From: over the mountain | Registered: Nov 2002  |  IP: Logged
Gir Draxon
leftist-rightie and rightist-leftie
Babbler # 3804

posted 31 July 2004 12:54 AM      Profile for Gir Draxon     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Faith influences both good and bad policies. Your post implies that W is a delusional whackjob because he is a Christian, and that is just plain unacceptable.
From: Arkham Asylum | Registered: Feb 2003  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 31 July 2004 07:57 AM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Seems to me like he's saying that it's delusional when your end-times apocalypse faith affects policy.

I would agree. I mean, if you want to comfort yourself with rapture stories, that's great, but when you start fucking up the whole planet in order to make it fall in line with your religious beliefs, that's delusional.


From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
TemporalHominid
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6535

posted 31 July 2004 12:50 PM      Profile for TemporalHominid   Author's Homepage        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Michelle:
Seems to me like he's saying that it's delusional when your end-times apocalypse faith affects policy.
Yes, that would be accurate.


Did Bush say God told him to go to War?

quote:
God told me to strike at al Qaida and I struck them, and then he instructed me to strike at Saddam, which I did, and now I am determined to solve the problem in the Middle East. If you help me I will act, and if not, the elections will come and I will have to focus on them.
-a translation of a translation of a translation of Bush's words to Palestinian PM, 06/25/2003


The Arabic-speaking colleague's translation is here:
Orders from the Highest Authority?


Whitehouse Link to Prayer Breaky address, Sunday, February 6, 2003

quote:
''Events aren't moved by blind change and chance''..., but by ''the hand of a just and faithful God.''


Does Christian fundamentalist certainty influence the Bush admin's policies, and make the Bush administration prone to making "faith based policies"?

[ 31 July 2004: Message edited by: TemporalHominid ]


From: Under a bridge, in Foot Muck | Registered: Jul 2004  |  IP: Logged
Melsky
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4748

posted 31 July 2004 01:10 PM      Profile for Melsky   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
It's sad when people use their religion as a reason to attack others, like George Bush or the 911 hijackers.

I don't think most religious folks are like this though.


From: Toronto | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
Cougyr
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3336

posted 31 July 2004 01:34 PM      Profile for Cougyr     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Gir Draxon:
Faith influences both good and bad policies. Your post implies that W is a delusional whackjob because he is a Christian, and that is just plain unacceptable.

W is a certainly a delusional whackjob. The religion is incidental. If W wasn't so rich and powerful, he would be dismissed as the fool he is.


From: over the mountain | Registered: Nov 2002  |  IP: Logged
nonsuch
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1402

posted 01 August 2004 08:26 PM      Profile for nonsuch     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Horesfeathers!
He's no more religious than i am. There is nothing remotely Christian in anything he's done as president or governor - or probably ever.

It's total, undiluted lying. (To be fair, i doubt he actually writes any of his own material - he's not even that fluent, reading it.)
To test this hypothesis, start with the question: Which of the heathen are sitting on oil? And then you might go on to questions about the Bushes' friends. Notice any saints? or even Christians?

From: coming and going | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
Zahid Zaman
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6459

posted 01 August 2004 08:31 PM      Profile for Zahid Zaman     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Well, Bush can be Christian and fundamentalist in the same manner as the 9/11 hijackers were. A good read to understand fundamentalism in the three monotheistic faiths is a Battle for God by Karen Armstrong. According to the description as detailed in teh book, Bush fits in nicely to the role of a Christian fundamentalist and most of his supporters do too.

It is fundamentalism in response to fundamentalism which sadly has been the state of religion for the majority of the past two millenia.


From: Mississauga/Waterloo, ON | Registered: Jul 2004  |  IP: Logged
N.Beltov
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4140

posted 01 August 2004 09:01 PM      Profile for N.Beltov   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
"Hail, Caesar!"...says Fidel, tongue firmly in cheek...as he mocks Bush and defends Canadians in the process...

quote:
...he labels the tourist industry in Cuba sex tourism and calls those who visit our country coming from the United States "paedophiles" and "pleasure seekers".

Mr Bush does not hesitate either in tarring Canadian tourists with the same brush when everybody knows that the overwhelming majority of them are pensioners and senior citizens who, in the company of their relatives, come to enjoy the exceptional safety and calm, the politeness, culture and hospitality that they find in our country.


Fidel on Bush, alcoholism and crackpot religiosity

Fidel makes the connection between Bush's (incomplete) recovery from alcoholism and his "fundamentalist approach"...mostly by collating Dr. Frank and Michael Moore's materials..

[ 01 August 2004: Message edited by: N.Beltov ]


From: Vancouver Island | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
Cougyr
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3336

posted 01 August 2004 10:02 PM      Profile for Cougyr     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by nonesuch:
Horesfeathers! He's no more religious than i am. There is nothing remotely Christian in anything he's done as president or governor - or probably ever.

I sympathize with your position on this. Keep in mind, though, the terrible things done by religious people throughout history. Most of the Fundamentalists that I have met have been complete nutters, full of contradictions. You know the type: against abortion because it's killing, but for capital punishment because they deserve what's coming to them. Or similar nonsense. Nut cases attach themselves to religion. In Bush's case, he has the power to annihilate the world, if God tells him to do it.

BTW, I know many deeply religious people who are not nuts, who would not blow up the world, etc. My comments are about nuts, not religion. Bush is nuts.


From: over the mountain | Registered: Nov 2002  |  IP: Logged
paxamillion
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2836

posted 02 August 2004 12:01 AM      Profile for paxamillion   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Cougyr:
Keep in mind, though, the terrible things done by religious people throughout history.

Do you keep in mind the killings of Stalin and Mao when discussing Marxism? The thing is, people who abuse power wrap themselves in the prevailing world view of the day.


From: the process of recovery | Registered: Jul 2002  |  IP: Logged
nonsuch
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1402

posted 02 August 2004 09:59 AM      Profile for nonsuch     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
... and are pretty damn selective in which godless wrong-doers they smite and which they do business with.

Much evil (i have no problem with that word) has been done in the name of religion, or ideals, but you need to look at the balance-sheet before judging the sincerity of the leaders.
The followers, minions, troops and mobs who do the actual killing may be carried away by zeal... then again, i always wonder how much of that is simple blood-lust with permission.

Of course, none of this means that the leaders are sane - only that they don't really believe in the deity whose name they use.

[ 02 August 2004: Message edited by: nonesuch ]


From: coming and going | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
DownTheRoad
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4523

posted 02 August 2004 10:18 AM      Profile for DownTheRoad     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I think most people would be surprised by Bush's denominational affiliation. When he turned to religion he was baptized as a United Methodist, a fairly progressive (relatively speaking) denomination, and has remained active with them since. Same as Hillary Clinton by the way.

There was fuss last year when a group of Methodist bishops publically denounced Bush for enacting policies contray to Jesus' teaching. Good for them.

Contrast this with the flak that John Kerry has been getting from his church.

[ 02 August 2004: Message edited by: DownTheRoad ]


From: land of cotton | Registered: Oct 2003  |  IP: Logged
thwap
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5062

posted 02 August 2004 10:22 AM      Profile for thwap        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
re: the depths of bush jr's religiosity ...

In Al Franken's "Lies, and the Lying Liars ..."

he mentions meeting the guy who took bush jr. out for a week or so of intensive bible study. Supposedly the spent their day studying one particular chapter, verse by verse, discussing its every meaning, and the rest of their time living simply and wholesomely.

I don't remember the part of the bible (New Testament) they focused on, but it turned out that Franken knew all about it because his son had to study it for a college essay.

So, Franken asks the guy about it, and the guy was clueless, blabbering about other parts of the New Testament, trying to guess right. Franken says it makes you wonder how seriously they were examining this stuff for a week (or more)?

Bush's religion is just some shallow, mindless soup of generalities that he uses to justify his mindless soup of generalities in general.

America=good, Capitalism=good, Christianity=good,
Me being president=good, me being rich=good, people who make me rich=good,

alcohol=good, more alcohol=good, super-bowl=good, floor spinning up towards me= huh, huh, huh, ['clunk!']


From: Hamilton | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged
nonsuch
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1402

posted 02 August 2004 02:25 PM      Profile for nonsuch     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Bush's religion is just some shallow, mindless soup of generalities that he uses to justify his mindless soup of generalities in general.

I love that sentence!

Well-meaning, decent lefties can't seem to grasp the depth of a dictator's cynicism, and have difficulty with the willingness of ordinary people to tear one another apart.
The peons are always angry, because somebody (the current dictator, his predecessors and, of course, their fellow 'haves and have-mores') always rip them off. Then, it's just a matter of stoking that anger and pointing in the direction you want them to charge. Say it's for God or the Fatherland, Liberty or Democracy, the flag, mother and apple pie... Works every time.


From: coming and going | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
Cougyr
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3336

posted 02 August 2004 03:23 PM      Profile for Cougyr     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by nonesuch:
. . .Then, it's just a matter of stoking that anger and pointing in the direction you want them to charge. Say it's for God or the Fatherland, Liberty or Democracy, the flag, mother and apple pie... Works every time.

Yup. It's the politics of fear. That's why I believe that the American people are complicit. It they'd stop letting themselves fall for the patriotic crap, their leaders would have to back off.

paxamillion, I have a low opinion of Stalin and Marx, too. Yes, you're right. People who abuse power, etc.


From: over the mountain | Registered: Nov 2002  |  IP: Logged
nonsuch
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1402

posted 04 August 2004 08:10 PM      Profile for nonsuch     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Complicit, always. Enthusiastic, sometimes. Ignorant, usually.
It's not all their fault, though. A great deal of very sophisticated science and consistent effort has gone into keeping them ignorant, scared and angry. Mass culture - by far the most effective component being television - has been geared to a lower and lower common denominator. Factor in that control of the media is concentrated in a very few hands and public education has been sytemmatically stripped of funding. Technology - especially if it's kept very expensive - makes it easy to propagandize the masses. If many preachers also chime the same note, Joe Blow hasn't got a chance.

From: coming and going | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
Cougyr
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3336

posted 05 August 2004 12:27 AM      Profile for Cougyr     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
nonesuch, I agree with you. The problem isn't all American. Most people don't want to think, don't want to keep an open mind, don't want to be informed, don't want to look outside the cave. It's downright depressing.
From: over the mountain | Registered: Nov 2002  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca