babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » right brain babble   » humanities & science   » What's the difference between religious and political proselytizing?

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: What's the difference between religious and political proselytizing?
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 09 July 2004 08:22 PM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
*knock* *knock* *knock*
(door opens, resident looks warily at callers)
Caller: Hi, how are you today?
Resident: Fine...
Caller: We'd like to give you some information about [current event or issue]. Have you ever wondered about [current event or issue] and how it affects your life?
Resident: [yes or no response, perhaps elaboration if you're lucky]
Caller: God is concerned about [current event or issue] too. He tells us that if we follow his word then he will give us [whatever good thing]. If you'd like to learn more about what God's word says about [whatever], our organization can show you the way.
Resident: [response]
Caller: Do you believe in God?
Resident: [response]
Caller: [short response to resident's response talking briefly about religious beliefs.] Thanks for your time. Could you tell me your name? Thanks, have a good day.

*knock* *knock* *knock*
(door opens, resident looks warily at callers)
Caller: Hi, how are you today?
Resident: Fine...
Caller: We'd like to give you some information about [current event or issue]. Have you ever wondered about [current event or issue] and how it affects your life?
Resident: [yes or no response, perhaps elaboration if you're lucky]
Caller: The NDP is concerned about [current event or issue] too. If [Local candidate/Party leader] is elected, then he will implement [whatever good policy]. If you'd like to learn more about NDP policy about [whatever], our campaign office can give you more information.
Resident: [response]
Caller: Can we count on your support this election?
Resident: [response]
Caller: [short response to resident's response talking briefly about political beliefs.] Thanks for your time. Could you tell me your name? Thanks, have a good day.


From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
spatrioter
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2299

posted 09 July 2004 08:37 PM      Profile for spatrioter     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Haha, I've always thought the same thing when canvassing. How similar it is, really.

I've also noticed the similarities between people who follow politics and people who follow sports.


From: Trinity-Spadina | Registered: Mar 2002  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 09 July 2004 09:48 PM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I know. However, some of the same people who would be offended at religious proselytizing would have no problem canvassing durign an election.

I've always hated canvassing, for that very reason.


From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Stephen Gordon
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4600

posted 09 July 2004 09:52 PM      Profile for Stephen Gordon        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I suppose the best way of thinking about it is that you're simply trying to find out who your potential supporters are so that you can call them up on election day to make sure they vote. No point in even dreaming that you'll convert someone on their doorstep.
From: . | Registered: Oct 2003  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 09 July 2004 10:05 PM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
True. However, that's what religious proselytizers do too. They drop off their literature and see who might be open to joining them, or learning more.
From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Debra
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 117

posted 09 July 2004 10:26 PM      Profile for Debra   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Ya but when canvassing you are trying to introduce people to a aystem which will enable them to have a better way of life, using a better system....hmm well um ya .....Ok you win.
From: The only difference between graffiti & philosophy is the word fuck... | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
nonsuch
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1402

posted 10 July 2004 12:18 AM      Profile for nonsuch     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Well, if you care about people and believe that your idea (system, philosophy, party, diet, movement, religion or whatever) would relieve some or all of their suffering, then you probably want to share that idea.

How do you go about sharing it?
You may write a book, get it published (HA!), do the tours, and reach only the literate, who can afford to buy a book and happen to want that book - a small percentage of the population.
Eventually, a lot more may get it second-hand or borrow it from the library.
Meanwhile, of course, they go on suffering.

You could advertise on television, newspapers, magazines and billboards - if you had unlimited funds.
You could make a movie.
You could try to sway influential people and have them pass the word.
You could stand on a soap-box and shout.
You could post a notice behind a locker in the men's room in the basement of - i forget what public building Arthur didn't visit in Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy and so didn't know that Earth was condemned.

If you're under some kind of time-constraint (as in election or last trump), you want to reach as many people as possible, as fast as possible.
Why should the method be different, if the intent and obstacles are the same?


From: coming and going | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
DrConway
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 490

posted 10 July 2004 12:25 AM      Profile for DrConway     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
As I see it, though, political canvassing is for a specific purpose and for a limited time only. So it's an acceptable way to try and gather your support.

However, religious canvassing is ongoing and doesn't end. That is annoying.


From: You shall not side with the great against the powerless. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Reverend Blair
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6377

posted 10 July 2004 12:56 AM      Profile for Reverend Blair   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I've never had a political canvasser lecture me on the evils of smoke and drink when I've invited them in for a beer with a smoke hanging out of my mouth. I think maybe they consider me a source of funding.

Other than that I don't see a lot of difference.

Of course I've never loosed a huge and violent shepherd on a religious visitor. I did that to a tory during Mulroney's last kick at the cat. I think he (the canvasser) had a bit of a conversion that day, or at least had to go home and change his shorts.


From: Winnipeg | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
BLAKE 3:16
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2978

posted 10 July 2004 03:03 AM      Profile for BLAKE 3:16     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Someone has to say hello first.
From: Babylon, Ontario | Registered: Aug 2002  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 10 July 2004 07:06 AM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by DrConway:
As I see it, though, political canvassing is for a specific purpose and for a limited time only. So it's an acceptable way to try and gather your support.

Jews for Jesus canvassing was only for a limited time and a specific purpose here in Toronto. And yet a lot of people were offended by it. Was it an acceptable way to try to gather support?


From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
nonsuch
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1402

posted 11 July 2004 12:00 AM      Profile for nonsuch     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Surely, what's acceptable or un- is in the mind of the target?
If somebody knocks on your door to beg for Halloween candy, charitable donations or political support; to sell cheese, a candidate, a magazine subscription or salvation, and you consider any of those unacceptable, you close the door. If all of them are unacceptable, you can post a notice: 'Don't Even Think Of Soliciting here!'.

I think there are far too many intrusions in our lives by strangers who want something. But i don't think society as a whole can draw lines according to subject matter, good taste or even the duration of a campaign. Still, if enough individuals just close the door, they'll probably stop.


From: coming and going | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
Anchoress
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4650

posted 11 July 2004 12:24 AM      Profile for Anchoress     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Reverend Blair:
I've never had a political canvasser lecture me on the evils of smoke and drink when I've invited them in for a beer with a smoke hanging out of my mouth.

Reverend, I love that image! I may even take up smoking just so I can imitate you the next time a religious canvasser comes a-knocking.


From: Vancouver babblers' meetup July 9 @ Cafe Deux Soleil! | Registered: Nov 2003  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 11 July 2004 07:22 AM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by nonesuch:
If all of them are unacceptable, you can post a notice: 'Don't Even Think Of Soliciting here!'.

One thing that I have noticed: even if you have a sign on your door saying, "No flyers or unaddressed mail, please," political leafletters seem to feel they are exempt.

I'm not sure what my point was in starting this thread. I think I was thinking about Jews for Jesus and how offensive they were with their billboards and leafletting and stopping people on the street and such. However...I got to thinking that they, and JWs, and Mormons, are really only doing the same thing that people from different parties do during elections. What makes religious beliefs any different than religious beliefs? Why is it acceptable to try to convert people to your party, but not acceptable to try to convert people to your religion?


From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478

posted 11 July 2004 10:39 AM      Profile for skdadl     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Whether people enjoy politics or not, there is pretty general agreement that politics is public or civic life -- the polis = the city, after all.

Evangelical religion, though: there would be many and deep divisions over how "public" religion is or should be, which is partly why some people are going to feel more bothered by those persistent missionaries on the doorstep. And the ones I've met really are persistent. In my experience, as soon as I tell a Liberal or a Con canvasser that I'm a member of the socialist hordes, they go away quickly. Mormons and JWs don't necessarily respond to the same treatment, and if you talk to them at all, they come BACK!

One reason to get your window or lawn sign really early in a political campaign -- the other guys won't bother ringing your bell.

But I don't know of a matching technique for the missionaries.


From: gone | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 11 July 2004 10:47 AM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
This is true, skdadl, that religious canvassers are more persistent. However, if you ask them not to come back again, they probably won't. The thing with religious canvassers is, they take advantage of your politeness. But I've found that if I don't engage them at all and just say, "I'm not interested, thanks," then they usually go away. I haven't experienced any foot-in-the-door tactics personally, although I'm sure others have. However, when I let them go through their spiel, they're almost certain to come back at the same time the next week!

And I've gotten reactions while canvassing for the NDP that are similar to ones I could imagine religious canvassers getting. None of your business how I'm voting - we have a secret ballot for a reason. That sort of thing.


From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478

posted 11 July 2004 10:56 AM      Profile for skdadl     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I confess that I have not canvassed for lo these many elections. Saint Tommy of Douglas, I have sinned. (I do have a short list of excuses, if you're interested. )

For about a year recently, I had a hand-written sign on our door asking people not to ring the bell if they weren't expected because we were a medical situation. I can't know, of course, how many polite people respected the sign, but there sure were a number of aggressive people who figured out ingenious ways around it.

Several people, eg, didn't ring -- they just pounded and pounded terrifyingly on the door. Our phone number was on the notice -- I thought people would take it down and phone from home, but I wasn't counting on the guys with cells who would phone while standing at the door!

And of course any number of people just decided, Oh, she can't mean me, and rang the bell anyway. Sigh.


From: gone | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
nonsuch
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1402

posted 11 July 2004 11:13 AM      Profile for nonsuch     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I've just been struck by lightning!
After the SARS episode, i bet there are official (or at least official-looking) quarantine signs available. That should work.

From: coming and going | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478

posted 11 July 2004 11:18 AM      Profile for skdadl     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Yeah. I must get me one of those. A big quarantine sign -- and maybe I'll fly the Jolly Roger right next to it.

I am perhaps at the extreme end of the anti-social range, mind.


From: gone | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
DrConway
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 490

posted 11 July 2004 01:58 PM      Profile for DrConway     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Michelle:
Jews for Jesus canvassing was only for a limited time and a specific purpose here in Toronto. And yet a lot of people were offended by it. Was it an acceptable way to try to gather support?

You know what I'm talking about, Michelle.

The government imposes restrictions on political canvassing for elections.

Jews for Jesus is under no such constraint. They can freely choose to extend their deadlines, extend their canvassing, and nobody can say them nay.


From: You shall not side with the great against the powerless. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 11 July 2004 02:07 PM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by DrConway:
You know what I'm talking about, Michelle.

The government imposes restrictions on political canvassing for elections.

Jews for Jesus is under no such constraint. They can freely choose to extend their deadlines, extend their canvassing, and nobody can say them nay.


Yeah, but they didn't. Their canvassing blitz was shorter than an election campaign. It wasn't 5 weeks long. So why was it more offensive?


From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
nonsuch
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1402

posted 11 July 2004 06:53 PM      Profile for nonsuch     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I guess it was just plain offensive. Lots of delicate sensibilities being pushed to the limit of their tolerance. Not that many people feel that strongly about elections.

Still, a time-limit on all prosletyzing, campaigns and fund-drives isn't such a bad idea. One week, max, and only one organization at a time. That way, if you mark your calendar for the year, you'll know which weeks to put out the Jolly Roger and borrow the Rotweiler.


From: coming and going | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
VoiceofTreason
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5852

posted 12 July 2004 02:17 PM      Profile for VoiceofTreason     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Not a gun advocate per se but a friend of mine recounted the tale of a co-worker who had a gun collection of some repute.

Said individual was in the habit of cleaning his weapons while watching the evening news.

One night there came a knock at the door and said co-worker resplentend in his "wife-beater" and y-fronts went to the door to find a pair of JWs.

Said gentleman waved the two inside (don't know why) but the two proselytizing visitors blanched at the idea and hastily made their excuses.

The guy had answered the door still holding the gleaming .357 magnum he'd been polishing before the door went.

The image is classic...suffice to say no JWs have come calling since.


From: Toronto | Registered: May 2004  |  IP: Logged
Tommy_Paine
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 214

posted 12 July 2004 07:25 PM      Profile for Tommy_Paine     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Actually, canvassing is about identifying the vote, not trying to sway people at the door. Identify and move on, identify as many votes as possible.

But, ya, there's not a whole lot of difference. I'm polite to prostyletizers. Fortunately, I've never been home when tories or Liberals came calling, so I've never been impolite to them either.

*sigh*


From: The Alley, Behind Montgomery's Tavern | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
Debra
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 117

posted 12 July 2004 07:27 PM      Profile for Debra   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Ah Tommy I was so hoping you had a great story about answering the door in something from Northbound.
From: The only difference between graffiti & philosophy is the word fuck... | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
Tommy_Paine
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 214

posted 12 July 2004 07:31 PM      Profile for Tommy_Paine     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
He he.

When you hear the door-bell, you could yell "Is that you Zed!" and open it while wearing some liederhosen, knee high stilleto boots, and one of those leather hoods with zippers over the mouth and eyes.

Sad to say though, my wearable costume is pretty subtle, and passes for everyday in most places.


From: The Alley, Behind Montgomery's Tavern | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
'lance
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1064

posted 12 July 2004 07:34 PM      Profile for 'lance     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
When you hear the door-bell, you could yell "Is that you Zed!" and open it while wearing some liederhosen, knee high stilleto boots, and one of those leather hoods with zippers over the mouth and eyes.

In The River's Edge, Dennis Hopper's standard way of greeting anyone who knocked on his door was to jerk it open a few inches, shove a taped-together old revolver in their faces (it literally had duct tape on it, and looked like it'd blow his hand off if he ever fired it), and scream:

"The check's in the mail!"

[ 12 July 2004: Message edited by: 'lance ]


From: that enchanted place on the top of the Forest | Registered: Jul 2001  |  IP: Logged
wei-chi
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2799

posted 13 July 2004 11:02 PM      Profile for wei-chi   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Since my home has been invaded by telemarketers as of late, I've suddenly wondered about why we get so upset by these things. Telemarketers, JWs, canvassers...

It is not like they break into your house, or make you answer the phone - we ourselves open the door or answer the phone, and we can close the door and hang up too.

We shouldn't be upset because one of our fellow citizens wants to ask us something.


From: Saskatoon | Registered: Jun 2002  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca