babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » walking the talk   » labour and consumption   » New Definition of Chutzpah

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: New Definition of Chutzpah
N.Beltov
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4140

posted 05 September 2008 05:36 AM      Profile for N.Beltov   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 

Brought to you by one of America's leading Kosher meatpackers!

See also the Jewish Daily Forward

see MRZine

[ 05 September 2008: Message edited by: N.Beltov ]


From: Vancouver Island | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 05 September 2008 05:41 AM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
This cartoon bothers me because they're focusing on the Jewish character of the business/owner to make a point about bad labour practices.

The fact that this guy is Jewish or the plant is kosher doesn't really have anything to do with the fact that they, like millions of other non-Jewish businesses, hire undocumented workers and treat them badly.

I don't like it. It feels somewhat anti-semitic to me. What do others think?


From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
N.Beltov
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4140

posted 05 September 2008 05:45 AM      Profile for N.Beltov   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Nathaniel Popper wrote about the story in the Jewish Daily Forward. Neither he nor the magazine he wrote for seemed to think there was anything anti-Semetic about doing an expose.
From: Vancouver Island | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
josh
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2938

posted 05 September 2008 06:13 AM      Profile for josh     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I don't see a problem with it.
From: the twilight zone between the U.S. and Canada | Registered: Aug 2002  |  IP: Logged
munroe
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14227

posted 05 September 2008 06:19 AM      Profile for munroe     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I don't see a problem either as the text does not appear to me to focus on ethnicity. Take out the word "kosher" and there are no other "tells". The lunacy of the argument from a class perspective is what is front and centre.

(I should add that the word "chutzpah" is widely used).

[ 05 September 2008: Message edited by: munroe ]


From: Port Moody, B.C. | Registered: Jun 2007  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 05 September 2008 06:33 AM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Okay. Well, maybe it just hit me the wrong way. I just feel like the fact that they're using a Yiddish term to mock a Jewish owner of a kosher business over his violation of labour laws means that they're focusing more on his ethnicity/religion - or that they're somehow tying his ethnicity to his misdeeds.
From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 05 September 2008 06:47 AM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by N.Beltov:
Nathaniel Popper wrote about the story in the Jewish Daily Forward. Neither he nor the magazine he wrote for seemed to think there was anything anti-Semetic about doing an expose.

What does that have to do with anything? My point was about the cartoon, not the story itself.


From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
munroe
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14227

posted 05 September 2008 06:55 AM      Profile for munroe     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
On the issue itself, the argument made by the Employer at this late stage is (understatement) tawdry. Do they really think any reasonable individual is going to buy the "discovery" of immigration status only after a successful union drive? Perhaps the real argument is that right to exploit undocumented workers is being challenged and that `right`must not be fettered by collectivisation!
From: Port Moody, B.C. | Registered: Jun 2007  |  IP: Logged
jrootham
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 838

posted 05 September 2008 07:45 AM      Profile for jrootham     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Michelle:
Okay. Well, maybe it just hit me the wrong way. I just feel like the fact that they're using a Yiddish term to mock a Jewish owner of a kosher business over his violation of labour laws means that they're focusing more on his ethnicity/religion - or that they're somehow tying his ethnicity to his misdeeds.

I don't see anything in the cartoon that I would describe as antisemitic (no hooked noses, no Jewish dress, etc.). The problem here is that English has borrowed chutzpah from Yiddish because it lacked a native word with the useful connotations that chutzpah has. Combined with the random fact that this is a kosher, and therefore Jewish, plant raises the risk of antisemitism.

If this was a plant owned by fundamentalist Christians, or absolute atheists, or any other combination would the cartoon change one iota? Not if I was drawing it (it would be really badly drawn, but that is another issue ).


From: Toronto | Registered: Jun 2001  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca