babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » right brain babble   » humanities & science   » Universal Morality?

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Universal Morality?
Arch Stanton
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2356

posted 06 November 2002 03:23 PM      Profile for Arch Stanton     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Back on the farm, as I was reading through Voltaire's Philosophical Dictionary, I came across the line, "There is only one morality...just as there is only one geometry." That sounded pretty good, so I absorbed the concept and tried to live by it.

A few years later, while playing hockey with a bunch of graduate students in physics, a chance conversation completely undermined this idea.

As one might expect, locker-room banter does not often change one's Weltanschaunng, but then again, hockey isn't a metaphor for life for no good reason.

A first-year physics student was asking his T.A. about a math question. I wasn't paying much notice until this shocking bit of dialogue:

Kid - "I couldn't get the right answer even though I followed the proper principles of geometry."

Sage Grad Student - "Try another geometry."

*Hari Krishna hare Krishna
Krishna Krishna
Hare hare....*


From: Borrioboola-Gha | Registered: Mar 2002  |  IP: Logged
nonsuch
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1402

posted 06 November 2002 08:32 PM      Profile for nonsuch     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
So, what's the other geometry like?

I posted an essay on morality a little while ago and it didn't draw a crowd. Maybe this question will do better.


From: coming and going | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
Arch Stanton
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2356

posted 06 November 2002 09:01 PM      Profile for Arch Stanton     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
So, what's the other geometry like?

Hellifino. I was a humanities major.


From: Borrioboola-Gha | Registered: Mar 2002  |  IP: Logged
Tommy_Paine
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 214

posted 06 November 2002 09:12 PM      Profile for Tommy_Paine     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I once came very close to imagining a triangle whose angles added up to 183 degrees. That's a different geometry.

I think what the guy was saying was that if you couldn't arrive at the right answer, then one of his assumptions was wrong. "Try a different geometry" meant, "try the right geometry."

Is there a universal morality? Try doing something completely altruistic. Even acts of charity etc, can be traced back to self interest, so maybe, in the end, self interest is the universal morality?

That's not as Anne Randish as it at first appears. Yes, the right and conservatives might champion that idea, but they have a rather myopic view of thier self interest. So myopic that their dogma actually works against self interest.

Today it's in my self interest not to eat you. After all, I don't want to be eaten. But, put us with no food in the Arctic for a month or so, and I'm betting with a little sage, you'd be mighty tasty, Arch.


From: The Alley, Behind Montgomery's Tavern | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
Arch Stanton
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2356

posted 06 November 2002 09:25 PM      Profile for Arch Stanton     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Ha! You'd be already roasted on a spit before you came up with the idea!
From: Borrioboola-Gha | Registered: Mar 2002  |  IP: Logged
abnormal
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1245

posted 06 November 2002 09:25 PM      Profile for abnormal   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
So, what's the other geometry like?

Probably not as different as you think.

quote:
a triangle whose angles added up to 183 degrees. That's a different geometry.

You want a triangle where the angles don't total 180 degrees? Draw it on the surface of a sphere.


From: far, far away | Registered: Aug 2001  |  IP: Logged
Timebandit
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1448

posted 06 November 2002 09:27 PM      Profile for Timebandit     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I don't think all actions are self-interested. I can think of one or two things I've done in my life that were for the benefit of others and were either of no benefit to me or a detriment, just because they were the right thing to do. I'm sure most people can.

I also don't think there is a single morality. We each construct our own.


From: Urban prairie. | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
Arch Stanton
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2356

posted 06 November 2002 09:29 PM      Profile for Arch Stanton     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Keen idea. These physicists, by the way, were space scientists and guys who worked at the linear accelerator - smashing atoms or something.

They probably had to draw triangles on spheres, within cubes, faster than the speed of light...


From: Borrioboola-Gha | Registered: Mar 2002  |  IP: Logged
Tommy_Paine
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 214

posted 06 November 2002 09:29 PM      Profile for Tommy_Paine     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The trick is to keep the sides of the triangle straight, and have them add up to more than 180 degrees.

Anyone can do the sphere thing.


From: The Alley, Behind Montgomery's Tavern | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
Jimmy Brogan
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3290

posted 06 November 2002 09:36 PM      Profile for Jimmy Brogan   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
If they were particle physicists the different geometries they were referring to probably related to the number of dimensions you use in your equations. 4,11, and 24 dimensions are popular with this crowd
From: The right choice - Iggy Thumbscrews for Liberal leader | Registered: Nov 2002  |  IP: Logged
DrConway
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 490

posted 06 November 2002 09:39 PM      Profile for DrConway     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
And the cool thing is that they all fold back into 4-d spacetime when the numbers pop out at the end.

quote:
I once came very close to imagining a triangle whose angles added up to 183 degrees. That's a different geometry.

I think what the guy was saying was that if you couldn't arrive at the right answer, then one of his assumptions was wrong. "Try a different geometry" meant, "try the right geometry."


Nyee-hee-hee-hee. Those nefarious TAs and physicists!

Actually, if you want some fun, look up Riemannian space-time. I believe it is positively curved.


From: You shall not side with the great against the powerless. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Tommy_Paine
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 214

posted 06 November 2002 09:41 PM      Profile for Tommy_Paine     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I perfer the Adams theory that says space/time is not just curved, it's absolutely bent.

I don't like bringing in convenient things like extra dimensions to solve problems. However, in the past when the math pointed to the seemingly absurd, later experimentation proved it to be correct.

So, I'm less inclined to dismiss the idea. Those dimensions are all folded/rolled up so much that we're not missing anything by not living in them anyway.

Before, I was wondering what was on T.V. in those extra dimensions, and feeling a lot of anxiety about not being able to see what else might be on.

[ November 06, 2002: Message edited by: Tommy_Paine ]


From: The Alley, Behind Montgomery's Tavern | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
Arch Stanton
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2356

posted 06 November 2002 09:43 PM      Profile for Arch Stanton     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Well, I don't know about all this math stuff, but we came within one win of winning the U of S intramural hockey championship.
From: Borrioboola-Gha | Registered: Mar 2002  |  IP: Logged
DrConway
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 490

posted 06 November 2002 10:13 PM      Profile for DrConway     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I love the idea of introducing as many dimensions as you want. It's the one part of abstract math that doesn't irk me, with the "clever" manipulation of an equation by adding something extra in order to develop new concepts or (most irritatingly) to be able to do a proper mathematical proof.
From: You shall not side with the great against the powerless. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca