Author
|
Topic: Does happiness breed complacency?
|
|
Rabid Gerbil
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2066
|
posted 13 February 2002 11:19 AM
Maybe comfort breeds appreciation. Maybe we can never totally be free of servitude. Now we are servants to the markets. Some would prefer we be servants to the state. We start off having others be our servants. Changing us, feeding us, etc. Soon thereafter we become the servants. We do as our parents direct. (At least those of us who are lucky enough to have firm loving parents do) Then we do as our teachers direct. Often we have friendships where we do as our friends direct. Then we enter the working world and do as our bosses direct. Those with their own businesses do as their clients direct. Those on welfare do as their social workers direct. Homeless do as the shelter workers direct. And all through our lives we all do as our spouses direct from time to time. We are all servants. Even alone on a desert island we would be a servant to the elements and the rotation of the earth. If you're looking for a live devoid of servitude - you will never find it. it does not exist. The trick is to find a situation where you can derive the most freedom, contentment and comfort while acknowledging that you must serve and be served in order to live. Our current sociopolitical system has given us more freedom and more comfort than any other in history. And yet there are those who seek to over throw it for some intangible, unattainable dream they have. [ February 13, 2002: Message edited by: Rabid Gerbil ]
From: Nova Scotia | Registered: Jan 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
nonsuch
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1402
|
posted 13 February 2002 08:03 PM
The comfort and happiness is only for a small percent of the world's population. There has always been a lucky (or ruthless) upper 10%. In the past few decades (which is a very short time), these lucky few have built a whole insulated culture of privilege, possessions and self-preoccupation, and tend to think of their (our) way of life as the norm, rather than the exception that it is. (Anxiety about less-than-icy-clean breath is NOT universal.) There is a tendency to believe that the world owes us continued existence in the manner to which we have become accustomed. Although some of us would like to, we are not going to change the situation; it's far more likely to come crashing down about our ears and most of us will be deeply shocked and outraged when it does. To answer the original question: Yes. Also willing tools, consenting dupes, witting and unwitting accessories; victims and conspirators. If you must be the servant of something, it's better to choose your master than drift into a semi-conscious servitude. I guess... [ February 13, 2002: Message edited by: nonesuch ]
From: coming and going | Registered: Sep 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
Rabid Gerbil
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2066
|
posted 14 February 2002 09:56 AM
You have the freedom in this wonderful society to choose any master you want. Our borders are open and you can go elsewhere if you cannot find what you are looking for here. Who or what you serve is within your control here moreso than it would be anywhere else. And yet you seem somewhat unsatisfied and petulant at the thought of us daring to have more thanother parts of the world. If and when it all comes crashing down you will likely sit back smuggly and say "I told you so". There is another thread on these boards about envy and forced equity and how people seem to enjoy depriving others of their possessions in order to bring them down to their level. Your attitude about how our society will be "brought down" demonstrates the same warped, sick attitude. [ February 14, 2002: Message edited by: Rabid Gerbil ]
From: Nova Scotia | Registered: Jan 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Rabid Gerbil
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2066
|
posted 14 February 2002 11:17 AM
I care about all those things. In fact I advocate a complate moritorium on refugees and the dismantling of all non essential social engineering government ministries such as multiculturalism, womens issues etc will all the money saved to go to house the homeless and provide health care to Canadians. It is people like you who refuse to make the tough decisions on how to allocate our money. I bet you have never seen a social equity expenditure that you didn't like. Maude Barlow's salary could provide many chemo treatments. And there are thousands like her, greedily suckling at the public teat. The money would best be spent on poor people who really need it. [ February 14, 2002: Message edited by: Rabid Gerbil ]
From: Nova Scotia | Registered: Jan 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
clersal
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 370
|
posted 14 February 2002 12:08 PM
Well Ms Gerbil, I really would love to give you my ideas but unfortunately, it seems to me that you do not recieve ideas very well, except of course your own. So with great regret I will share my ideas with those who are willing to discuss.I do wish you all the best in your struggle for attaining intelligence. I do not want to disappoint you but I do believe, that in your particular case it really is a lost cause. Perhaps a CAT scan could find the problem. I am not talking about the furry ones here Ms Gerbil, just in case you do not understand. Perhaps another site would be more to you liking and your ideas as you really are pissing a lot of people off. As the great Confucius said, 'Small things amuse small minds'. [ February 14, 2002: Message edited by: clersal ]
From: Canton Marchand, Québec | Registered: Apr 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
nonsuch
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1402
|
posted 14 February 2002 01:19 PM
All societies, even the most wonderful, crash sometime: they have a life-cycle, like everything else in the universe. It's not a question of whether it will end, but of when and how. And why. One can derive a good deal of amusement from learning the origins and processes of the society in which one lives, the sources on which it feeds, the illnesses and injuries it suffers. One may derive a good deal of satisfaction from trying to affect the process, direction and pace of that society's growth and decline. But one cannot prevent time passing or History unfolding. When this era ends, i won't be sitting smugly anywhere; there is almost no chance of my surviving this cycle. If a few of the young remember what i told them, perhaps they will educate and prepare themselves better to build the next cycle. And small rodents may fly - some do it already. [ February 14, 2002: Message edited by: nonesuch ]
From: coming and going | Registered: Sep 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Just_A_Man
recent-rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2181
|
posted 14 February 2002 06:30 PM
The amount of influence a society has on the world is a good determinent of the position init's life cycle. One culture proseprs for what ever reasons, other cultures incorporate the successful elements, or they may be forced to accept it, either way the original influence passes across the world and another empire is created."The Empire never ended" -Philip K. Dick, Valis If you want to look at statistics that can support this argument and will enable an easying view of our past social movements and pop culture movements view the demographics of North America compared to developing and third world countries, especially the Middle East, India, and Indonnesia, and China, especially now that they have evened out their birht rate. [ February 14, 2002: Message edited by: Just_A_Man ]
From: London, Ont | Registered: Feb 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
vaudree
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1331
|
posted 15 February 2002 08:52 AM
quote: Are we wilfully ignorant of our servitude and complacency,
There is an ingrown tendency to focus on what we have control over and to ignore the rest. When forsed to do otherwise leads to feelings of hopelessness. I think Elvis Stoico said it best - that you can't control the judges, and no matter how much practice you have how well you perform on a given day is in the hands of fate - that to stay focused and do your best you have to stay focused on that aspect of your performance you have control over and that is doing the best that you can at that moment in time.Complacency is what scientists call "base-line." Americans felt safe knowing that they were number one - and to be anything but number one is scary to them because they experience it as if the world has just fallen apart. To regain number one status for them is not celebration but a restored sense of normalcy. What we are used to is experienced as the normal state - anything below that is losing ground and anything above that is victory. When being number one is your normal state you will do anything to maintain that and you become a slave to that maintenance. Here in Canada we have the power of not being number one. We have a much wider variety of stuff to celebrate and, while we may be sinical, we are not under constant threat of feeling that our world has just fallen apart. But we are also slaves in the fact that, as a nation, we do not control our own destiny.
From: Just outside St. Boniface | Registered: Sep 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|