I avoid this debate because I just get into ranting soliloquies covering the same old ground, and depress myself about the future to boot, but this piece is actually good.It Includes the valuable point --
"While creationism in general has moved ever closer to scientific language in its various incarnations over the past century, Lancaster University historian Thomas Dixon noted that the modern debate over intelligent design -- largely an American phenomenon -- is really about neither science nor religion, but the American constitution, which has kept religion out of schools. The intelligent design movement, he said, is simply a reaction to this prohibition, which does not exist in Britain.
"Given that so many scientists and religious people believe the theory does disservice to both science and religion, Dixon said, "a solution to this may be to have schools teach religion. Let them teach Christianity and everything else. It may be a complete and utter revolution in American history, but I'm saying it's a good idea."
Interesting just as another part of why America SO exceptional on this, but also generally.
Probably applies to debates like sharia arbitrations in Ontario: better to enfold the point of view with which you disagree, and let its edges get worn away by reality, than to confront it so that it can thrive in splendid isolation.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/02/03/AR2006020300822_pf.html