babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » right brain babble   » humanities & science   » Where are our satellites located?

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Where are our satellites located?
Cougyr
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3336

posted 27 September 2004 11:28 PM      Profile for Cougyr     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
One would think that Canada's communication satellites would be located, well you know, like over Canada. But, step outside and look at the satellite tv dishes in your neighbourhood. They all point south, at about 25 degrees above the horizon, at least where I live. That means the satellites are very far south, over the US. Are they actually over the equator? Where are they? Why aren't they right above us?
From: over the mountain | Registered: Nov 2002  |  IP: Logged
Agent 204
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4668

posted 27 September 2004 11:43 PM      Profile for Agent 204   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
They have to be over the equator. It's the only place you can achieve a geosynchronous orbit. A satellite couldn't, say, orbit above the Tropic of Cancer or the Arctic Circle, because if it did it wouldn't be orbiting around the Earth's centre of gravity. So any orbit except at the equator would mean the satellite wouldn't say put in the sky but would rise and set. Not too good for TV.

[ 27 September 2004: Message edited by: Mike Keenan ]


From: home of the Guess Who | Registered: Nov 2003  |  IP: Logged
Cougyr
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3336

posted 28 September 2004 12:27 AM      Profile for Cougyr     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
That makes sense, Mike. So, how do they reach north of 60? Can they reach the poles?
From: over the mountain | Registered: Nov 2002  |  IP: Logged
beluga2
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3838

posted 28 September 2004 12:54 AM      Profile for beluga2     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Well, a geosynchronous orbit has to be about 36,000 kilometers above the equator, so I don't imagine a satellite that far away would have any trouble "seeing" past the curvature of the earth.

There's also "polar orbits", which circle the earth vertically, from North Pole to South & back, several times a day, while the whole earth rotates underneath them. A favourite orbit for weather satellites... and spying, of course.


From: vancouvergrad, BCSSR | Registered: Mar 2003  |  IP: Logged
Coyote
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4881

posted 28 September 2004 01:08 AM      Profile for Coyote   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
They're in the sky.


cricket

Right?

Technophobes, present ignorance.


From: O’ for a good life, we just might have to weaken. | Registered: Jan 2004  |  IP: Logged
Albireo
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3052

posted 28 September 2004 01:42 AM      Profile for Albireo     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
If you want to visualize the various satellite orbits, you can play around with a J-Track, a Java Applet at the NASA site. Click on "JTrack 3D" if you're on a half-decent PC, and you'll be able to see satellites' orbits and current locations. Use your mouse to roll the Earth around and view from different angles. Double-click on a dot, and it will show you the orbit of that satellite. From the Satellite menu, choose "select", and you can view any individual satellite's orbit. You'll see how the geostationary communications satellites like Anik E1 & E2 are way out over the equator, while others like the ISS are in a very low orbit.

[ 28 September 2004: Message edited by: Albireo ]


From: --> . <-- | Registered: Sep 2002  |  IP: Logged
Cougyr
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3336

posted 28 September 2004 01:42 AM      Profile for Cougyr     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Coyote:
They're in the sky.
cricket
Right?
Technophobes, present ignorance.

"Sky?" So, I know these things are up there. However, my dish is aimed barely over the hill south of my house. There are places around here which can't get a satellite signal, because of that hill. Are the satellites high enough to have line of sight over the curvature of the earth all the way to the poles? When they are not even high enough to clear a hill?

Hey, I can't even get a decent CBC signal, and I'm only about 15 km from the repeater. Again, there's this hill . . .


From: over the mountain | Registered: Nov 2002  |  IP: Logged
Doug
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 44

posted 28 September 2004 02:31 AM      Profile for Doug   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
People in the far north probably do have a problem getting satellite signals if they happen to be north of a hill. The alternative's too expensive, though. Satellites in any other orbit will move relative to observers on the ground, so any receiving system for them would have to follow the satellite's track across the sky. It also means that any one satellite would spend a lot of time below the horizon relative to a particular receiver and so you'd need multiple satellites to provide constant transmission.
From: Toronto, Canada | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
Tackaberry
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 487

posted 28 September 2004 02:51 PM      Profile for Tackaberry   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
So how many satellites are up there? If they are restricted to such a small band, how come they never crash into each other?

We need a forum 'Everything you sorta wanna know, but are too lazy to look up yourself

[ 28 September 2004: Message edited by: Tackaberry ]


From: Tokyo | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Reality. Bites.
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6718

posted 28 September 2004 03:30 PM      Profile for Reality. Bites.        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Doug:
People in the far north probably do have a problem getting satellite signals if they happen to be north of a hill.

The further north you are, the lower the dish is on the horizon, and the larger the size of dish required.


From: Gone for good | Registered: Aug 2004  |  IP: Logged
Surferosad
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4791

posted 29 September 2004 02:40 AM      Profile for Surferosad   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Tackaberry:
So how many satellites are up there? If they are restricted to such a small band, how come they never crash into each other?

We need a forum 'Everything you sorta wanna know, but are too lazy to look up yourself

[ 28 September 2004: Message edited by: Tackaberry ]


The "band" isn't that small. I don't know its exact size, but I would guess that it is several thousands of km wide. Also, more importantly, geosynchronous satellites have fixed positions relative to each other, as long as they are roughly at the same height relative to Earth. This is true of any satellite, by the way. Satellites closer to Earth orbit faster, satellites further away will be slower. Satellites in geosynchronous orbit turn around the Earth with a speed equal to that of the Earth's rotation.

[ 29 September 2004: Message edited by: Surferosad ]


From: Montreal | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
aRoused
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1962

posted 29 September 2004 06:19 AM      Profile for aRoused     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Another thing to consider when you think about the direction the dish is pointing is this:

Is it a parabolic dish, or a spherical one? (bear with me).

Parabolic dishes have the received square in the middle of the curve of the dish, so the signal reflects off the dish and is focused there. But, a parabolic dish is a difficult shape to manufacture. A spherical dish is easier to manufacture, but won't focus all the signal to a point directly in front of the dish. It will, however, focus the signal properly if it's set so the incoming signal 'strikes' the dish a glancing 'blow'. That's why (AFAIK) that ExpressVu and similar satellite TV dishes have the receiver slightly below the 'dish', instead of directly in front of it. This would make more sense if I could sketch you a drawing..

So your signal is probably arriving from somewhat higher than you thought it was just from looking at where the dish is 'pointing'.

Regarding 'having enough room' in geosynchronous orbit, the Earth's circumference is 40,000km, with a radius of about 6400km IIRC. Diameter = (pi) times double the radius. Since a geosynchronous satellite has to be 36,000km above the Equator, they've got just over 250,000km of orbit they can fill up with satellites. That's over halfway from the Earth to the Moon, to give you an idea of the amount of space involved..


From: The King's Royal Burgh of Eoforwich | Registered: Dec 2001  |  IP: Logged
radiorahim
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2777

posted 01 October 2004 02:21 AM      Profile for radiorahim     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
So how many satellites are up there? If they are restricted to such a small band, how come they never crash into each other?

Lots!

There's even alot of space junk up there in orbit (space pollution!) that all has to be tracked to make sure things don't bump in to each other. Every geosynchronous satellite has its own "parking space" so to speak and "who gets what" is all decided by international agreements.

Not all satellites are in geosynchronous orbit either. (Although communications satellites have to be). Some satellites are in various eliptical (sp?) orbits.

There are also weather satellites, research satellites (monitoring pollution and things like that), military spy satellites that take pics of the "other guy's" war toys, even ham radio satellites (I've played with some of these...they're really cool!)

And of course there's the International Space Station which is a large enough object that it can be seen with the naked eye when it's doing a pass (although not in urban areas!).

I once saw the old Soviet "MIR" space station doing a pass over southern Ontario. MIR was a pretty large object as satellites go. The ISS is even larger.

If you make a long distance phone call, in many cases it gets routed through a satellite. Even the data you're posting on babble will get routed through a satellite or two.


From: a Micro$oft-free computer | Registered: Jun 2002  |  IP: Logged
A Nonny Moose
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7023

posted 06 October 2004 11:31 PM      Profile for A Nonny Moose   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
And then there are the satellites used by the Geographic Positioning System (GPS) which is becoming quite popular now in motor vehicles. I do not think these are in geosynchronous orbits, but in others.

Satellites in this net, I think there are 24 now, rise and set, but it is rigged so that at least three of them can see any point on earth all the time. Your GPS receiver does an automatic triangulation on the ones it can "see", and computes the data from them.

All the ocean radio aids to navigation are being phased out, and soon Decca, Loran and other systems will be but a memory for us old salts to yarn about. If you ever had to do a Loran fix by hand, well, God bless you.


From: Wasaga Beach, Ontario, Canada | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged
arborman
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4372

posted 08 October 2004 03:09 AM      Profile for arborman     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Loran! Pain in the arse it were, for setting a tow...

GPS has its weaknesses as well, though it was improved when they stopped creating deliberate error.


From: I'm a solipsist - isn't everyone? | Registered: Aug 2003  |  IP: Logged
Raos
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5702

posted 08 October 2004 04:51 AM      Profile for Raos     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Why would they deliberately make an error?
From: Sweet home Alaberta | Registered: May 2004  |  IP: Logged
aRoused
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1962

posted 08 October 2004 05:36 AM      Profile for aRoused     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The deliberate error was to round off the last few digits of the positioning data being sent by the satellites. The military had a special version that didn't have that rounding off. So the military (the US military) could use GPS to get positioning accuracy on the order of centimeters, while everyone else had to make do with accuracy in the tens of meters. Security, dont'cha know. Mining companies and surveyors used to get around it by using two units at once: a fixed base station and a mobile unit. Knowing the distance between the two, you could correct for the rounded-off data you were getting from the satellites.
From: The King's Royal Burgh of Eoforwich | Registered: Dec 2001  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 08 October 2004 12:13 PM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I've worked in mining and mineral exploration, and we never used GPS back in the 80's and early 90's. A Silva compass was all I carried around in the bush. I'll never forget a first job I had about 70 miles east of Reindeer Lake with the sun hanging so low in the sky all day. I'd never seen 50 below for a week long before that. All day I had an overwhelming feeling that nightfall was upon us and that we should head for the ski-doos. We were doing magnetometer and VLF surveys. The LCD panel on my instrument would often freeze up if the batteries were low and didn't keep it inside my parka inbetween hoofin' it to the next 25 metre grid location.

VLF surveys measure the secondary field given off
rock and ore bodies as a percentage of the primary field transmitted from the nearest military VLF substation, which could be as far away as Cutler, Maine, for example. Various mineral deposits have their own distinct VLF "signature." Mag surveys measure the intensity of the earth's magnetic lines of flux as well as the angle of dip they make with respect to the earth. Again, an ore body will alter the norm or baseline reading of the surrounding country side. Power stations, water, electrical transmission lines and Canadian taxpayer funded oil and gas pipelines to carry our raw materials south can appear to be an ore body or mineral anomaly when graphed.

Of course, exploration companies now take advantage of multi-spectral satellite and radar exploration techniques, thanks to taxpayers ...again.

[ 08 October 2004: Message edited by: Fidel ]


From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
August1991
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6768

posted 16 October 2004 11:32 PM      Profile for August1991     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Interesting thread. This post is late but the following web site is fascinating. (Choose the J-Track 3D tab and then click on the dots or the earth to move it.)

The site has detailed information about most of the satellites. It's fun to go looking for the ones placed in the wrong orbit.

J-Track 3D Satellite Map


From: Montreal | Registered: Aug 2004  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca