We have yet another discussion on the merits or lack of them regarding the re-active approach of punishment for 'criminal's. But when are we going to expend our resources on pro-active crime prevention instead?I - and many others too - couldn't give a rat's ass what is done to the offender after the fact. The victim is still robbed, raped, murdered, brutalized and otherwise traumaitized. As is both the victim's and often the offender's, family, friends, co-workers, neighbours and the public at large.
We possess a wealth of knowledge regarding the causations of crime, with poverty and childhood abuse and/or neglect heading the list. Yet our governments continue down the reactive road of waiting until there is a victim before rsponding. Meanwhile the ranks of welfare recipients and the homeless continue to grow with children swelling the numbers of disadvantaged and marginalized members of our so-called society.
Crime prevention is a renewable form of Justice while punishment is a diminishing fossilized idea.
The Cognitive skills program iniitiated in the 80's by a Canadian researcher showed great promise as, not only a crime prevention tool if it was incorporated into the school system, but also a builder of greater social cohesion as well. Basically the program explorers the way in which people think [or do not think] and offers better, pro-active, tools for problem solving and human interactions.
But no. The cog skills program was relegated to the so-called Corrections system and languishes in an re-active environment where it is scorned by a majority of both the guards and the inmates.
Criminology 101 tells us there is no crime without FIRST there being a law to declare it so. The mayor of Vancouver says he sees drug addictions as just another handicapped not unlike his own experience with being a quadrapalegic. Yet we still see the legally drug addicted population created by pharmacuetical companies villifying the illegally addicted populations created by venture capitalists we call organized crime.
Then there is the disturbing trend to putting more and more cops on the streets. A method that consumers way more of our resources than it protects. One chief of police stated he could not hire a new officer without first budgeting close to $250,000 to cover the infrastructure costs required in terms of pay, benefits, equipment, resources and paperwork. In fact, the police are the only ones who really benefit from the current approach with their high salaries and perks galore.
As already stated, but well worth repeating, it matters not what we do after the fact, the victim is still robbed, raped, murdered, brutalized and otherwise truamatized. I vote for the pro-active model of crime prevention over that of simply reacting after the fact.