babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » right brain babble   » humanities & science   » Authoritarian Personalities - A Clear and Present Danger

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Authoritarian Personalities - A Clear and Present Danger
jrootham
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 838

posted 11 May 2007 09:34 PM      Profile for jrootham     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Robert Altemeyer at this site has a book summarizing his research on authoritarian personalities. He makes a very convincing argument for the significance of the types.

The book is designed to be very accessable and is leavened with much humour, however, the message is pretty scary right now.


From: Toronto | Registered: Jun 2001  |  IP: Logged
a lonely worker
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9893

posted 11 May 2007 09:47 PM      Profile for a lonely worker     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Speaking of authoritarian personalities. Psychiatrists have identified one disorder and have listed it's characteristics:

Right-wing Authoritarianism

Talk about a perfect description.

I agree that fascist authoritarianism is frighteningly on the upswing.

Here's a test you can take to see where you fall in this "New World Order":

The F Scale


From: Anywhere that annoys neo-lib tools | Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged
jrootham
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 838

posted 11 May 2007 10:13 PM      Profile for jrootham     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Altemeyer points out that it's not too useful to use these tests on individuals. Also, he devised a new test (which starts his book) to deal with some of the problems of the Adorno test. So, if you really want to, you should use his test.
From: Toronto | Registered: Jun 2001  |  IP: Logged
a lonely worker
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9893

posted 11 May 2007 10:39 PM      Profile for a lonely worker     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Thanks jrootham I'll check it out.
From: Anywhere that annoys neo-lib tools | Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged
marzo
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12096

posted 12 May 2007 06:02 AM      Profile for marzo     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The F test gave me a score of 1.63 and labelled me a 'whining rotter.' That's so cute!
The test does not allow for answers like 'I don't know', 'what do you mean?' or 'maybe'.
It is ironic that this test is supposed to be based on psychiatric 'science', an ideology that claims authority while providing no evidence of helping troubled people.

From: toronto | Registered: Feb 2006  |  IP: Logged
jester
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11798

posted 12 May 2007 06:45 AM      Profile for jester        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
2.6 I'm a liberal airhead.
From: Against stupidity, the Gods themselves contend in vain | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged
oldgoat
Moderator
Babbler # 1130

posted 12 May 2007 07:10 AM      Profile for oldgoat     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
It would seem that at 1.8 I am also a whining rotter. I tried answering every question with a 1, which still left me as a whining rotter. The tester needs more epithets. I wonder if "wooly headed socialist" is in there. Oh well, at least I'm not a liberal airhead.
From: The 10th circle | Registered: Jul 2001  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 12 May 2007 07:17 AM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
1.533333 etc. A whining rotter.
From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
jester
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11798

posted 12 May 2007 07:20 AM      Profile for jester        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by oldgoat:
It would seem that at 1.8 I am also a whining rotter. I tried answering every question with a 1, which still left me as a whining rotter. The tester needs more epithets. I wonder if "wooly headed socialist" is in there. Oh well, at least I'm not a liberal airhead.

I may not share your exalted position in the progressive food chain but liberal airhead is a large improvement over right wing colonialist warmongering neocon.


From: Against stupidity, the Gods themselves contend in vain | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged
jrootham
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 838

posted 12 May 2007 02:39 PM      Profile for jrootham     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I should have known better. Let me summarize what he says a bit more to try to head off playing with irrelevant toys.

In Altemeyer's terminology Rigth Wing Authoritarians (RWAs) Are heavily focussed on keeping fear at bay by having everyone follow rules and conform to the norm. However, almost all of them are fairly timid aobut actually doing anything themselves. They are followers. The other thing that is significant about RWAs is that, to put it bluntly, they don't think very well. In particular, they compartmentalize so that they do not see when they are being contradictory. If they agree with a leader they will believe him long past any logical contradiction.

However, there is another category which Altemeyer calls Social Dominators (SDs). These are people who are aggressive about gaining power and wealth and don't care much about how they do it. Their dominant philosophy is "don't get caught". The two groups are not disjoint, in fact there is a small positive correlation between them.

The SDs are the dangerous politicians, the RWA SD politicians are more dangerous because they have an easier connection to unthinking followers.

He also cites the Milgram experiments to point out that just about everyone is willing to follow orders.


From: Toronto | Registered: Jun 2001  |  IP: Logged
jrootham
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 838

posted 27 April 2008 01:39 PM      Profile for jrootham     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I'm bumping this because it is relevant to the US political debate. I linked to the site on the Obama thread.

To reiterate, Altemeyer has created a questionnaire to identify what he calls Right Wing Authoritarians (RWAs). These are people who think norms (social, political, and religious) should be enforced with punishment. He also identifies Social Dominators (SDs) and points out the dangers involved with politicians that are both RWA's and SD's.

He figures we dodged a bullet in the 2006 elections. The 2008 elections are coming up. Another bullet is on its way.


From: Toronto | Registered: Jun 2001  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 27 April 2008 02:02 PM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I think Americans are beginning to suspect that something is wrong with their two party plutocracy when one of the two parties has to resort to stealing elections to seize power.
From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca