Author
|
Topic: Third of Americans Say Evidence Has Supported Darwin's Evolution Theory
|
Snuckles
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2764
|
posted 19 November 2004 08:13 AM
Gallup has released the results of a recent poll concerning American's attitudes towards evolution, creationism, the Bible,etc. 45% of Americans still believe "God created human beings pretty much in their present form at one time within the last 10,000 years or so". Which is the same percentage as the last time this poll was conducted in February 2001. Read the rest here. [ 19 November 2004: Message edited by: Snuckles ]
From: Hell | Registered: Jun 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Snuckles
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2764
|
posted 23 November 2004 08:58 PM
Another poll on the subject, this time from CBS.Poll: Creationism Trumps Evolution quote: (CBS) Americans do not believe that humans evolved, and the vast majority says that even if they evolved, God guided the process. Just 13 percent say that God was not involved. But most would not substitute the teaching of creationism for the teaching of evolution in public schools.Support for evolution is more heavily concentrated among those with more education and among those who attend religious services rarely or not at all. There are also differences between voters who supported Kerry and those who supported Bush: 47 percent of John Kerry’s voters think God created humans as they are now, compared with 67 percent of Bush voters.
[ 23 November 2004: Message edited by: Snuckles ]
From: Hell | Registered: Jun 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
NDP Newbie
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5089
|
posted 01 December 2004 01:02 AM
Anti-Evolutionry Stupidity Gaining InfluenceThe way they used to teach the origin of the species to high school students in this sleepy town of 1,800 people in southern Pennsylvania, said local school board member Angie Yingling disapprovingly, was that "we come from chimpanzees and apes." Not anymore. The school board has ordered that biology teachers at Dover Area High School make students "aware of gaps/problems" in the theory of evolution. Their ninth-grade curriculum now must include the theory of "intelligent design," which posits that life is so complex and elaborate that some greater wisdom has to be behind it.
From: Cornwall, ON | Registered: Mar 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
fuslim
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5546
|
posted 01 December 2004 08:36 PM
quote: Their ninth-grade curriculum now must include the theory of "intelligent design," which posits that life is so complex and elaborate that some greater wisdom has to be behind it.
This intelligent design stuff is must be the funniest thing I've ever heard. Intelligent design? Whoever designed me wasn't that bright. They gave me nipples...I'm still trying to figure out what they're for (I should point out I'm male). They gave me a vermifrom appendix, which apparently exists so that I can die in extremem pain from appendicitis, which has a lifetime occurence of 7%. They gave me fingernails, which would be great if I could use them for something besides chewing (perhaps that's what they're for). Earlobes, I guess they're like the fins on a '56 Caddie...neat, but useless. Intelligent design my ass...speaking of which, there's the hair...
From: Vancouver BC | Registered: Apr 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
jeff house
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 518
|
posted 01 December 2004 08:59 PM
quote: It's a throwback to a time when paleontologists thought humans had evolved from apes -- that is, apes of the kind that exist today
To be even more precise, it is a throwback to the concept of "the Great Chain of Being". According to that theory, there was an ascending order of animals, culminating in man. It was like a staircase, with one and only one species occupying each step. The idea was that one of the links of the chain was missing, the transitional on between ape and man. Now we know that evolution is like a bush, not a staircase, with multiple associated species, dead ends, etc. The greatr chain of being ended, originally, with angels at the top. Later, man was deemed the highest creature. Nowadays, we know that animals have evolved for a specific evolutionary niche. No animal is higher than any other.
From: toronto | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|