Author
|
Topic: Genetic evidence for Anglo-Saxon apartheid
|
Doug
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 44
|
posted 18 July 2006 04:26 PM
Which just goes to show how concepts of race change over time, since today most people would consider Celts (Britons) and Anglo-Saxons to be part of the same race. quote: Scientists believe a small population of migrants from Germany, Holland and Denmark established a segregated society when they arrived in England.The researchers think the incomers changed the local gene pool by using their economic advantage to out-breed the native population. The team tells a Royal Society journal that this may explain the abundance of Germanic genes in England today.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/5192634.stm
From: Toronto, Canada | Registered: Apr 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
S1m0n
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11427
|
posted 18 July 2006 08:25 PM
quote: Originally posted by Doug: Which just goes to show how concepts of race change over time, since today most people would consider Celts (Britons) and Anglo-Saxons to be part of the same race.
I suppose they are. In fact, the entire 'race' idea in humans is completely arbitrary: scientifically, we're all one race. The celts (ie britons) and germans (ie anglo-saxons) were two or the indo-european tribes which erupted from somewhere in central asia. They're vaguely related to each other, but not closely. During the time of the saxon invasions, the native britons experienced the invaders as blonde giants.
From: Vancouver | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594
|
posted 19 July 2006 12:05 PM
quote: Originally posted by S1m0n:
The Vikings and Saxons were closely related, being the north and west branches of the germanic people, respectively.
I was told that true Vikings were from either Denmark or Norway, the original seafaring Vikings. I think there are some Norwegian names that almost sound German when pronounced but are spelled differently. But I imagine the German's could have had an adventuresome streak with some access to beach front property. Russian's are supposed to be a mix of Swedish Vikings and Mongols. Some relatives of mine sailed from Norway to South Yorkshire England about 500 years ago and have owned anywhere from three to five market garden-farms ever since, and there was no sacking or looting necessary. [ 19 July 2006: Message edited by: Fidel ]
From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594
|
posted 20 July 2006 02:33 AM
The BBC article says quote: We believe that they also prevented the native British genes getting into the Anglo-Saxon population by restricting intermarriage in a system of apartheid that left the country culturally and genetically Germanised.
"This is exactly what we see today - a population of largely Germanic genetic origin, speaking a principally German language."[/quote] They must know about the Norman(Norse men) conquest in 1066 and English language being displaced for a couple of centuries, surely. And the region of Northumbria and Yorkshire Dales still bear a sizable number of locals with striking physical similarities - fair to Nordic blonde hair and blue eyes ie. Norwegian, Norwegian-Irish and Danish Vikings. They still eat Danish back bacon today in my family's town and where some of the orginal Norwegian place names are still used. Maltby and Stamford are more Anglo than Saxon.
From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
Odin
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12824
|
posted 20 July 2006 10:53 AM
quote: And the region of Northumbria and Yorkshire Dales still bear a sizable number of locals with striking physical similarities - fair to Nordic blonde hair and blue eyes ie. Norwegian, Norwegian-Irish and Danish Vikings. They still eat Danish back bacon today in my family's town and where some of the orginal Norwegian place names are still used. Maltby and Stamford are more Anglo than Saxon.
Interesting point, my father was adopted, but his pre-adoption name was "Osbourne," which is a name that has it's origins in Old Norse. Although, he didn't have blonde hair and blue eyes, but red hair (changed to brown) and blue eyes, which sounds like a Norse trait, but my experience in the study of genetic expression amongst European cultural groups is rather limited. Another interesting thing, is, while reading Thucydides, he mentions other groups native to the Greek peninsula that were not Greek and that the Greeks recognized as having been there before them. Of course, it's almost impossible to say who was anywhere "first" as humans are migratory animals IMHO.
From: Greater Vancouver | Registered: Jul 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
S1m0n
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11427
|
posted 20 July 2006 05:20 PM
quote: Originally posted by Fidel: They must know about the Norman(Norse men) conquest in 1066 and English language being displaced for a couple of centuries, surely.
The other name for "Norse" is "North Germanic". The scandinavaians, the anglo-saxons, the germans and (now extict) Goths are the four branches of the Germanic peoples.
From: Vancouver | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594
|
posted 21 July 2006 10:21 AM
quote: Originally posted by VanLuke:
The German language does belong to the Indo-European family, does it not?
I've read something similar. Any group of people who blow on bagpipes have some ties to the Celts somewhere along the line, including the Roman's, and I imagine Spaniards as well who played bagpipes going into battle. I've listened to people from Wales speaking in a sing-song manner and I thought I was listening to Pakistani's for a moment. DNA shows Scots and Irish should look to Spain for their ancestry Yes, I don't believe the Spanish sailors would have been allowed to come ashore in great numbers. I don't think the British sailors press-ganged into service against the Armada's faired well though. Their reward for loyal service to her majesty would be to live out their lives in extreme poverty and die prematurely after they were of no more use to the blue bloods.
From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
Drinkmore
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7371
|
posted 21 July 2006 10:49 AM
quote: Originally posted by Fidel:
I've read something similar. Any group of people who blow on bagpipes have some ties to the Celts somewhere along the line, including the Roman's, and I imagine Spaniards as well who played bagpipes going into battle. I've listened to people from Wales speaking in a sing-song manner and I thought I was listening to Pakistani's for a moment. DNA shows Scots and Irish should look to Spain for their ancestry
That there are a lot of Celts in Spain (Celta Vigo and Galician as an official language, etc) doesn't surprise me at all but that Basques are genetically similar to Celts seems quite remarkable.
From: the oyster to the eagle, from the swine to the tiger | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
Yst
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9749
|
posted 21 July 2006 11:49 AM
quote: Originally posted by S1m0n:
The other name for "Norse" is "North Germanic". The scandinavaians, the anglo-saxons, the germans and (now extict) Goths are the four branches of the Germanic peoples.
Really, on the larger timescale, ethnographically and linguistically, Anglo-Saxons and Modern Germans are both simply West Germanic, and the three major classifications are West Germanic, East Germanic and North Germanic. It's difficult to make a connection between the modern groups and their medieval counterparts, however. No single classification will suit both modern Germanic ethnography and philology and its equivalents anywhere beyond 1,000 years ago. In the early medieval era, the logical division is one which identifies the continental Saxons, Frisians and Anglo-Saxons as belonging to a common Northwest Germanic group who share mutually intelligible if regionally distinct Germanic dialects and who all happen to have converted to Christianity by shortly after 800AD, where most of their other northern Germanic neighbours still have not. Now, on the other hand, Frisians and Continental Saxons are split between groupings in Scandinavia, Germany and elsewhere, removing any logical regional classification, and Low Saxon and Frisian share far more with Modern Standard German and Dutch respectively than with their common Northwest Germanic ancestor, English.
From: State of Genderfuck | Registered: Jun 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
VanLuke
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7039
|
posted 21 July 2006 08:55 PM
quote: Originally posted by Fidel: [QB]I've read something similar.
It was a rhetorical question. There is a very interesting dictionary by Langenscheidt called Dictionary of Indo-European Languages that I looked at three decades ago when I was a student. (I love languages) It arranges words in groups (I forgot the criteria for the arrangement) with all (or most) Indo-European languages side by side. It's very interesting to look at how the words changed.
From: Vancouver BC | Registered: Oct 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594
|
posted 22 July 2006 12:34 AM
quote: Originally posted by arborman:
Perhaps, but later on we discovered goulash, which makes up for a lot.
Never had a Hungarian goulash. I've eaten the typical Irish stew and Cajun dishes with roux though. Yum! I wonder if there are any watered-down Norwegian's who dislike raw fish as much as I do. burp! Boom Boom mentioned having an extreme reaction to Bratwurst, which I can enjoy. For me, the foodie apocalypse would be pickled Herring or raw conger eel, or high game. I can't believe some of my relatives acshully ate that stuff. Blech!
From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Proaxiom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6188
|
posted 04 August 2006 03:59 AM
quote: Originally posted by S1m0n:
Look up the indo-europeans. It's what people are talking about when they say "caucasian".
I think you're confusing linguistics with heredity. 'Indo-European' refers to a language group that encompasses almost every European language (exceptions are Basque, Finnish, Hungarian, and a few minor ones in Russia), Iranian/Persian, and various central and south Asian languages including Sanskrit and its descendants. But linguistic relation doesn't imply close genetic relation at all. While the Celtic language is Indo-European, and all those languages came from Asia (ultimately, I think the proto-Indo-European language is believed to have been spoken by a people in eastern Turkey), it doesn't mean the Celts themselves came from there. The Germanic, Latin, Slavic, and Norse language families are also Indo-European.
From: East of the Sun, West of the Moon | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|