Author
|
Topic: An Academic Question
|
Snuckles
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2764
|
posted 05 April 2005 11:10 PM
quote: It's a fact, documented by two recent studies, that registered Republicans and self-proclaimed conservatives make up only a small minority of professors at elite universities. But what should we conclude from that?Conservatives see it as compelling evidence of liberal bias in university hiring and promotion. And they say that new "academic freedom" laws will simply mitigate the effects of that bias, promoting a diversity of views. But a closer look both at the universities and at the motives of those who would police them suggests a quite different story. Claims that liberal bias keeps conservatives off college faculties almost always focus on the humanities and social sciences, where judgments about what constitutes good scholarship can seem subjective to an outsider. But studies that find registered Republicans in the minority at elite universities show that Republicans are almost as rare in hard sciences like physics and in engineering departments as in softer fields. Why?
Read it here. (and get thee a login ID here.) [ 05 April 2005: Message edited by: Snuckles ]
From: Hell | Registered: Jun 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
Scott Piatkowski
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1299
|
posted 05 April 2005 11:15 PM
Here we see the right complaining about under-representation on campuses. When women and visible minorities made such complaints from the 1960s onward, they were accused of "political correctness" and told that "all hiring was done on merit".So, I'm saying, "Let's throw their rhethoric back at them." Surely you're not advocating that we have hiring quotas! Why should colleges have to lower the bar so that lesser qualified conservatives can be hired? This could be fun. [ 05 April 2005: Message edited by: Scott Piatkowski ]
From: Kitchener-Waterloo | Registered: Sep 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hinterland
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4014
|
posted 05 April 2005 11:39 PM
"Because they goes where the moneys are"...Yeah, right, PitaPocket. Thanks for that. You know, most non-trolls here either post something within their sphere of knowledge, ask questions, or just simply shut up.
From: Québec/Ontario | Registered: Apr 2003
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rufus Polson
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3308
|
posted 06 April 2005 04:22 PM
quote: Originally posted by PitaPlatter:
Because they go where the money is- The Business World.
{sarcasm}Oh, yeah, all those physicists make tons of cash in the private sector.{/sarcasm} University faculty make pretty good gobs of cash. And so they should*--they do important research and help create the next generation of educated people. And they have a lot more independence than private sector scientists as a rule. It's one of the better careers around. Dashed hard to get into nowadays with all the poor sessional instructors being treated like piecework labourers, but that's a different story. *(As long as we have an economy that creates big divisions based on money, anyway)
[ 06 April 2005: Message edited by: Rufus Polson ]
From: Caithnard College | Registered: Nov 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
arborman
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4372
|
posted 06 April 2005 08:33 PM
quote: Originally posted by swirrlygrrl:
Poli sci for me has always been a mixed bag. The worst right wingers I ever met were in the political theory. All convinced they would be the ultimate Philospher King, and had the true handle on the esoteric meanings of Plato, Bacon and Nietzsche, busy sneering about "men and women, exercising together, naked. *snicker* Things *dramatic pause* BOUNCING." Fuckers.
No kidding. I might even have had the same professor. The righties/conservatives tend to cluster in political theory (where reality is optional and secondary to being well-read) and international relations (proto-neocons). The one hard right non-theory prof I had was COnrad Winn, and he just opted out of talking about the class content, and instead focusing on how Arabs are bad.
On the other hand, I found a lot of excellent and balanced professors, with healthy reserves of doubt and skepticism about any political explanation or ideology, in the rest of political science. That is likely one of the reasons the theocons hate it so much - rational doubters are anathema to theoconservatism.
From: I'm a solipsist - isn't everyone? | Registered: Aug 2003
| IP: Logged
|
|