babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » right brain babble   » humanities & science   » An Academic Question

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: An Academic Question
Snuckles
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2764

posted 05 April 2005 11:10 PM      Profile for Snuckles   Author's Homepage        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
It's a fact, documented by two recent studies, that registered Republicans and self-proclaimed conservatives make up only a small minority of professors at elite universities. But what should we conclude from that?

Conservatives see it as compelling evidence of liberal bias in university hiring and promotion. And they say that new "academic freedom" laws will simply mitigate the effects of that bias, promoting a diversity of views. But a closer look both at the universities and at the motives of those who would police them suggests a quite different story.

Claims that liberal bias keeps conservatives off college faculties almost always focus on the humanities and social sciences, where judgments about what constitutes good scholarship can seem subjective to an outsider. But studies that find registered Republicans in the minority at elite universities show that Republicans are almost as rare in hard sciences like physics and in engineering departments as in softer fields. Why?


Read it here.
(and get thee a login ID here.)

[ 05 April 2005: Message edited by: Snuckles ]


From: Hell | Registered: Jun 2002  |  IP: Logged
Scott Piatkowski
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1299

posted 05 April 2005 11:15 PM      Profile for Scott Piatkowski   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Here we see the right complaining about under-representation on campuses. When women and visible minorities made such complaints from the 1960s onward, they were accused of "political correctness" and told that "all hiring was done on merit".

So, I'm saying, "Let's throw their rhethoric back at them."

Surely you're not advocating that we have hiring quotas! Why should colleges have to lower the bar so that lesser qualified conservatives can be hired?

This could be fun.

[ 05 April 2005: Message edited by: Scott Piatkowski ]


From: Kitchener-Waterloo | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
al-Qa'bong
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3807

posted 05 April 2005 11:22 PM      Profile for al-Qa'bong   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Republicans are almost as rare in hard sciences like physics and in engineering departments as in softer fields. Why?

The off-the-cuff response would be that they're ignorant, uneducated yahoos.


From: Saskatchistan | Registered: Feb 2003  |  IP: Logged
Scott Piatkowski
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1299

posted 05 April 2005 11:24 PM      Profile for Scott Piatkowski   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Plus. science departments aren't big on people who say "noo-kular" and believe in "creation science".
From: Kitchener-Waterloo | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
DrConway
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 490

posted 05 April 2005 11:28 PM      Profile for DrConway     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Speaking anecdotally, the science department folks I deal with in chem, biochem and physics seem to generally be a mixed bag of political views. The professors also tend to be a mixed bag. I think I'm pretty safe in saying no-one I know is terribly impressed that Dubya can't say "nuclear" properly, especially not in the nuclear-science minor program.

I think it's the business faculties that tend to get all the right-wing nuts.

[ 05 April 2005: Message edited by: DrConway ]


From: You shall not side with the great against the powerless. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
PitaPlatter
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8256

posted 05 April 2005 11:33 PM      Profile for PitaPlatter     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Republicans are almost as rare in hard sciences like physics and in engineering departments as in softer fields. Why?

Because they go where the money is- The Business World.


From: Toronto | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
Américain Égalitaire
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7911

posted 05 April 2005 11:38 PM      Profile for Américain Égalitaire   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Heh, the people I know who were whizzes in physics and engineering are making plenty of big bucks. Try living the high life as a working journalist!
From: Chardon, Ohio USA | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged
Hinterland
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4014

posted 05 April 2005 11:39 PM      Profile for Hinterland        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
"Because they goes where the moneys are"...

Yeah, right, PitaPocket. Thanks for that.

You know, most non-trolls here either post something within their sphere of knowledge, ask questions, or just simply shut up.


From: Québec/Ontario | Registered: Apr 2003  |  IP: Logged
PitaPlatter
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8256

posted 06 April 2005 12:01 AM      Profile for PitaPlatter     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
As I said previously Hinterland go mau-mau one of your own. You are out of your league.
From: Toronto | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
Papal Bull
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7050

posted 06 April 2005 12:21 AM      Profile for Papal Bull   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 

The armour of ignorance is strong and resiliant!


From: Vatican's best darned ranch | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged
No Yards
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4169

posted 06 April 2005 12:21 AM      Profile for No Yards   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by PitaPlatter:

Because they go where the money is- The Business World.


The world of crime, also a place where we find lots of money, would be another good place to look for your average overachiving conservative.


From: Defending traditional marriage since June 28, 2005 | Registered: Jun 2003  |  IP: Logged
beluga2
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3838

posted 06 April 2005 12:26 AM      Profile for beluga2     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Or better yet, follow in the footsteps of Ken Lay and get the best of both worlds.
From: vancouvergrad, BCSSR | Registered: Mar 2003  |  IP: Logged
No Yards
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4169

posted 06 April 2005 12:31 AM      Profile for No Yards   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The field of professional bilking of old folks out of their life savings using religion is another good choice for young conservatives just starting out and looking for a growth area.
From: Defending traditional marriage since June 28, 2005 | Registered: Jun 2003  |  IP: Logged
Surferosad
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4791

posted 06 April 2005 12:46 AM      Profile for Surferosad   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Well, if you're a christian fundamentalist, you can't be a geology professor. But I've met some very economically conservative geology professors...

[ 06 April 2005: Message edited by: Surferosad ]


From: Montreal | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
Granola Girl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8078

posted 06 April 2005 03:05 AM      Profile for Granola Girl     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
What frightens me most are the right wing students. So young - yet so irretrievably lost. It's sad really, watching young lives being cut short by conservatism.

I had a class last year in which I was the only lefty! It was really scarring for me. I think its something to do with European history classes. One of my friends explained it this way: European history classes are a safe space for some students to construct an imagined past of uncomplicated racial purity. No messy pluralities to deal with.


From: East Van | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged
Snuckles
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2764

posted 06 April 2005 03:38 AM      Profile for Snuckles   Author's Homepage        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Surferosad:
Well, if you're a christian fundamentalist, you can't be a geology professor. But I've met some very economically conservative geology professors...

[ 06 April 2005: Message edited by: Surferosad ]


There is Keith Miller, a geology prof at Kansas State who is also an evangelical Christian. He isn't a young earth Genesis literalist however, he is best described as a theistic evolutionist.


From: Hell | Registered: Jun 2002  |  IP: Logged
Surferosad
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4791

posted 06 April 2005 02:37 PM      Profile for Surferosad   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Snuckles:

There is Keith Miller, a geology prof at Kansas State who is also an evangelical Christian. He isn't a young earth Genesis literalist however, he is best described as a theistic evolutionist.


In other words, he isn't a fundamentalist... To me, christian fundamentalism implies a literal interpretation of the bible.


From: Montreal | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
jeff house
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 518

posted 06 April 2005 03:45 PM      Profile for jeff house     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
One of my friends explained it this way: European history classes are a safe space for some students to construct an imagined past of uncomplicated racial purity.

But forty five seconds' sudy of the barbarian invasions of Europe at the end of the Roman period would make it utterly clear that racial purity is a joke.

When I was a student, all the lefties studied history, European and otherwise. We wanted to know when the next revolution was coming.


From: toronto | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Alix
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2279

posted 06 April 2005 03:57 PM      Profile for Alix     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Surferosad:
Well, if you're a christian fundamentalist, you can't be a geology professor. But I've met some very economically conservative geology professors...

[ 06 April 2005: Message edited by: Surferosad ]


I've never understood this, but my uncle who is a mining engineer is also a fundamentalist Christian.


From: Kingston | Registered: Feb 2002  |  IP: Logged
Rufus Polson
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3308

posted 06 April 2005 04:22 PM      Profile for Rufus Polson     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by PitaPlatter:

Because they go where the money is- The Business World.

{sarcasm}Oh, yeah, all those physicists make tons of cash in the private sector.{/sarcasm}

University faculty make pretty good gobs of cash. And so they should*--they do important research and help create the next generation of educated people. And they have a lot more independence than private sector scientists as a rule. It's one of the better careers around. Dashed hard to get into nowadays with all the poor sessional instructors being treated like piecework labourers, but that's a different story.


*(As long as we have an economy that creates big divisions based on money, anyway)

[ 06 April 2005: Message edited by: Rufus Polson ]


From: Caithnard College | Registered: Nov 2002  |  IP: Logged
Granola Girl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8078

posted 06 April 2005 05:16 PM      Profile for Granola Girl     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Oh, I know Jeff! I was in rapture when I discovered Louise Michel and the Paris Commune...ah, 1871...

It seems on my campus all the radical faculty and students are funnelled into poli-sci or women's studies.


From: East Van | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged
swirrlygrrl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2170

posted 06 April 2005 06:13 PM      Profile for swirrlygrrl     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
What about sociology and anthropology?

Poli sci for me has always been a mixed bag. The worst right wingers I ever met were in the political theory. All convinced they would be the ultimate Philospher King, and had the true handle on the esoteric meanings of Plato, Bacon and Nietzsche, busy sneering about "men and women, exercising together, naked. *snicker* Things *dramatic pause* BOUNCING." Fuckers.


From: the bushes outside your house | Registered: Feb 2002  |  IP: Logged
Stephen Gordon
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4600

posted 06 April 2005 06:24 PM      Profile for Stephen Gordon        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
[Thanking his lucky stars that the thread is based on a column written by an economist, so he won't be obliged to argue yet again that economist \neq right-wing ideologue.]
From: . | Registered: Oct 2003  |  IP: Logged
Surferosad
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4791

posted 06 April 2005 06:33 PM      Profile for Surferosad   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Alix:

I've never understood this, but my uncle who is a mining engineer is also a fundamentalist Christian.


Mining engineers don't know much geology. I know, I've T.A.'ed a bunch of them... Their speciality is digging mine shafts and going after ore. Most of the guys I've met (they're all guys, with few exceptions) wanted to be mining eng. so that they could use explosives...


From: Montreal | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
Stephen Gordon
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4600

posted 06 April 2005 07:25 PM      Profile for Stephen Gordon        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Probably somewhat orthogonal to the thread, but I remember a similar discussion as an undergrad, including a physics student who was an Orthodox Jew. He saw no contradiction at all: God made the Laws, and he wanted to learn what they were.
From: . | Registered: Oct 2003  |  IP: Logged
arborman
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4372

posted 06 April 2005 08:33 PM      Profile for arborman     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by swirrlygrrl:

Poli sci for me has always been a mixed bag. The worst right wingers I ever met were in the political theory. All convinced they would be the ultimate Philospher King, and had the true handle on the esoteric meanings of Plato, Bacon and Nietzsche, busy sneering about "men and women, exercising together, naked. *snicker* Things *dramatic pause* BOUNCING." Fuckers.


No kidding. I might even have had the same professor. The righties/conservatives tend to cluster in political theory (where reality is optional and secondary to being well-read) and international relations (proto-neocons). The one hard right non-theory prof I had was COnrad Winn, and he just opted out of talking about the class content, and instead focusing on how Arabs are bad.

On the other hand, I found a lot of excellent and balanced professors, with healthy reserves of doubt and skepticism about any political explanation or ideology, in the rest of political science. That is likely one of the reasons the theocons hate it so much - rational doubters are anathema to theoconservatism.


From: I'm a solipsist - isn't everyone? | Registered: Aug 2003  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca