babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » from far and wide   » nfld, labrador, pei, ns, nb   » Michael Savage's parliamentary record

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Michael Savage's parliamentary record
Briguy
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1885

posted 20 June 2008 11:12 AM      Profile for Briguy     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
For the second session of the 39th Parliament, working backwards from June 19th:

June 19
On moving from a discussion about Omar Khadr to other business: Abstained/Absent

Mr. Savage was not mentioned in the Hansard

June 18
Second reading of Bill C-513 (an amendment to the National Defence Act requiring Commons consent before sending troops on an offensive foreign mission): Nay (voted with the Cons)

Second reading of Bill C-505 (an amendment to the Canadian Multiculturalism Act to exempt Quebec): Nay (voted with the Cons)

Mr. Savage rose on a single point of order, asking that Bill S-204 (which he sponsored) be voted on later that day. The request was refused, as it did not received unanimity from the House.

June 17
Third reading of Bill C-29 (to close a loan loophole with regard to campaign contributions/limits): Nay (only Liberals voted Nay)

He spoke briefly to ask the House to support (in no concrete manner) Winstone Zulu, an HIV and TB health advocate from Zambia, and to ask generally that "Canada do more to stop TB and support heroes like Winstone Zulu".

June 16

No vote tallied; no mention of Mr. Savage in the Hansard

June 13

No vote tallied; no mention of Mr. Savage in the Hansard

June 12

Motion 465 (Airline Passenger Bill of Rights): Voted Yea (unanimous vote)

Motions 1+2 on Bill C-207, an amendment to the Income Tax Act giving a credit to new graduates in designated regions: Voted Yea (split vote with all parties

A motion to concur in the sixth report of the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development: voted Nay (split vote amongst parties).

Made a speech in which he shot down Bill C-513.

Made a short speech in which he compared Harper to Nixon for no other reason than to needle the opposition? He then opened the door for the Conservatives to remind parliament of the Sponsorship Scandal.


Wow. I'll have to continue this later. There is not a quick way to sift through the Hansard.


From: No one is arguing that we should run the space program based on Physics 101. | Registered: Nov 2001  |  IP: Logged
largeheartedboy
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5360

posted 20 June 2008 07:07 PM      Profile for largeheartedboy     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Funny Savage anecdote.

I was at an NDP meeting in Ottawa, and Thomas Mulcair was the guest speaker. After a great speech, a student activist got up to ask him about post-secondary education during the Q & A session. As he finished his question, he mentioned meeting with Scott Brison and Michael Savage.

Mulcair said with a puzzled look, "Michael Savage?"

The activist responded, "you know the MP, I think he's the Liberal post-secondary education critic".

Mulcair: "Honestly, I don't even know the man".

I think this tells us something about Savage as a parliamentarian.


From: Ottawa | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312

posted 20 June 2008 07:12 PM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
He also voted against labeling GMO foods.
From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
It's Me D
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 15152

posted 21 June 2008 04:03 AM      Profile for It's Me D     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Nice anecdote largeheartedboy
From: Parrsboro, NS | Registered: Apr 2008  |  IP: Logged
largeheartedboy
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5360

posted 22 June 2008 03:42 PM      Profile for largeheartedboy     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by It's Me D:
Nice anecdote largeheartedboy

Why does Savage manage to hang on to his seat then?

If I'm not mistaken, does the Nova Scotia NDP not hold all the provincial ridings in his riding?


From: Ottawa | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
V. Jara
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9193

posted 23 June 2008 01:43 AM      Profile for V. Jara     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by largeheartedboy:

Why does Savage manage to hang on to his seat then?

If I'm not mistaken, does the Nova Scotia NDP not hold all the provincial ridings in his riding?


Coat-tails. The NDP also has yet to find a "king-killer" candidate.


From: - | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged
V. Jara
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9193

posted 23 June 2008 01:49 AM      Profile for V. Jara     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The NDP's current candidate looks like an excellent one btw.

She won't have the benefit of being able to borrow volunteers from the Halifax riding, however, as that is going to be an open seat next time around.


From: - | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged
KenS
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1174

posted 23 June 2008 03:15 AM      Profile for KenS     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
You posted the candidate webpage for Halifax West.

Mike Savage is the Dartmouth MP, and it is correct that the NDP holds all the provincial seats- by huge margins.

How did that happen?

Two things. The NSNDP isn't always that well organized. Unfortunately we didn't do a great job at the same time the incumbent Wendy Lill retired and Paul Martin was effective at pulling NDP/Lib swing votes in 2004.

Now that he is in Mike Savage will be hard to unseat. Part of that is the normal incumbent thing. A big part is the well deserved good reputation of the Savage name in Dartmouth.

And Mike is smart- he appears with and liases with the NDP MLAs as much as he possibly can. Helps that he has long standing links to some of them- but he would do it anyway.


From: Minasville, NS | Registered: Aug 2001  |  IP: Logged
V. Jara
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9193

posted 23 June 2008 05:36 AM      Profile for V. Jara     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Doh! I knew that. The candidate in Dartmouth-Cole Harbour is Brad Pye.
From: - | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged
It's Me D
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 15152

posted 23 June 2008 06:13 AM      Profile for It's Me D     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
A big part is the well deserved good reputation of the Savage name in Dartmouth.

And Mike is smart- he appears with and liases with the NDP MLAs as much as he possibly can. Helps that he has long standing links to some of them- but he would do it anyway.


KenS is right this is certainly the heart of it. If Savage looses it will be Dion that lost the seat to the NDP and not Savage; at the constituency level Savage is hard to beat, in Ottawa he's irrelevant.


From: Parrsboro, NS | Registered: Apr 2008  |  IP: Logged
KenS
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1174

posted 23 June 2008 06:37 AM      Profile for KenS     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I didn't want to say that. For one thing, the NDP candidate is a friend.

But it will take a general wave where the NDP is generally really thrashing the Liberals in Nova Scotia.

South Shore, Gerald Keddy MP, is the most likely pick-up for the NDP in the next election.

And despite Halifax West not being the degree of NDP turf Dartmouth is, and Geoff Regan being a well established incumbent, even HW might a more likely gain fot the NDP than Dartmouth.

Mike Savage can run personally as 'good as the NDP'. The only way of breaking that is if people vote entirely on the Liberal brand. The Cons are so far behind in Dartmouth anyway, and Harpers personal unpopularity is Savage's bulwark against Liberal votes drifting that way.


From: Minasville, NS | Registered: Aug 2001  |  IP: Logged
It's Me D
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 15152

posted 23 June 2008 08:41 AM      Profile for It's Me D     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
South Shore, Gerald Keddy MP, is the most likely pick-up for the NDP in the next election.


From: Parrsboro, NS | Registered: Apr 2008  |  IP: Logged
liberally
recent-rabble-rouser
Babbler # 15321

posted 02 July 2008 05:03 AM      Profile for liberally     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
briguy, i will assume you support the ndp, just a guess, and you will no doubt assume correctly that i am a Savage supporter. Now that we have gotten that out of the way, let me just suggest that by any standard, savage is a progressive and hardworkingn MP, and ya, it would be easy to pick through anyone's record and contextualize, fair enough...now, as for Muclair, he is a new MP so it is surprising that he woudnt know another MP yet, and what did you expect him to say, that Savage is a great guy!
From: ottawa | Registered: Jul 2008  |  IP: Logged
kropotkin1951
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2732

posted 02 July 2008 11:14 AM      Profile for kropotkin1951   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Gee has he defied his party and actually voted on any legislation this parliament. True progressives vote for what they believe in not sit on their hands and let Harpo rule as a majority right wing government unopposed.
From: North of Manifest Destiny | Registered: Jun 2002  |  IP: Logged
Briguy
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1885

posted 02 July 2008 11:35 AM      Profile for Briguy     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I'm on record as not supporting Savage, it's true. I questioned his popularity from the start, as I would any politician with handed-down name recognition. Thankfully, he's there in the house to cast progressive votes against conservative initiatives. More power to his progressive self.

There wasn't much context in my opening post. If he was in the House and his name was printed in the Hansard, I listed the reason why. Look it up.


From: No one is arguing that we should run the space program based on Physics 101. | Registered: Nov 2001  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca