Author
|
Topic: Why D-Day/WWII nostalgia is overdone
|
|
al-Qa'bong
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3807
|
posted 04 June 2004 06:52 PM
As someone whose been nostalgic for this era ever since childhood, I can't explain.I've made the pilgrimage to the invasion beaches twice, but haven't had much of an urge to go to other battlefields. Perhaps the reason is that the place is a beach, and is thus part of the more permanent natural world, unlike an equally important site, such a Stalingrad. I should add that there are many people who tour what's left of the trenches of the Great War's Western Front who have no urge to visit Normandie. [ 04 June 2004: Message edited by: al-Qa'bong ]
From: Saskatchistan | Registered: Feb 2003
| IP: Logged
|
|
Stephen Gordon
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4600
|
posted 04 June 2004 09:20 PM
I think it's a big deal because it's one of the biggest 'what-ifs?' of the last century. Its success was by no means a sure thing, and if it had failed, the outcome of WWII would have most certainly been greatly altered. The allies would not have been able to mount another invasion for several months, if ever.If the D-Day landings had failed, WWII would have ended very differently, with incalculable consequences. Imagine how the history of the second half of the 20th century would have evolved if Western Europe had been liberated by the Red Army. [ 04 June 2004: Message edited by: Oliver Cromwell ]
From: . | Registered: Oct 2003
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|