babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


  
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » archived babble   » international peace movement   » The next holocaust

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: The next holocaust
Cougyr
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3336

posted 02 December 2005 03:23 PM      Profile for Cougyr     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Islamophobia is not a uniquely British disease: across Europe, liberals openly express prejudice against Muslims. Do new pogroms beckon? Ziauddin Sardar reports from Germany, the Netherlands, Belgium and France.
New Statesman article

A troubling article. He could have added North Americans to his list of Islamophobics.


From: over the mountain | Registered: Nov 2002  |  IP: Logged
lagatta
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2534

posted 02 December 2005 03:53 PM      Profile for lagatta     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
It's a troubling article in many ways, but I don't see anything to indicate a holocaust of Muslims (or people defined as Muslims) on the horizon in the article.

The hardest part is trying to come up with a viable solution. It can't be merely "voluntarist" anti-racism as in the SOS-racisme campaigns of the 1980s.

There is no question but that ghettoisation is the result of racism and exclusion, but it becomes a self-perpetuating phenomenon, troubling in its own right, especially in so far as the status of women is concerned.


From: Se non ora, quando? | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged
Critical Mass2
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 10908

posted 02 December 2005 04:16 PM      Profile for Critical Mass2        Edit/Delete Post
quote:
He could have added North Americans to his list of Islamophobics.

I think North America, and specifically Canada, is the one place it would not happen.

After the September 11 attacks, there was a major opinion poll done internationally about what people thought of various issues such as security, immigration, multiculturalism, coexistence of different religions. I'd have to track it down but I distinctly remember the major results.

In most Western countries (France, Germany, Netherlands etc.), the number of people against any further immigration and expressing hostility to muticulturalism increased dramatically. Canada was the only country in the entire survey where the number of people who favoured maintaining high immigration levels increased and where support for multiculturalim policies increased. The majority of Canadians also expressed support for better safeguards for civil liberties for Muslim citizens as a way of making sure that any necessary anti-terrorism measures did not go overboard and target innocent people.

Canada has stronger safeguards than many European countries. For one thing, the wide acceptance of multiculturalism here which is still anathema everywhere in Europe. I would be worried about places like France and Holland less so about Canada. Any tensions in Canada have pitted rigthwing Muslims against liberal and leftwing Muslims and their allies, such as in the sharia tribunal case. We have not had the open hostility of large majorities of Europeans against the entire Muslim community the article describes.


From: AKA Critical Mass or Critical Mass3 - Undecided in Ottawa/Montreal | Registered: Nov 2005  |  IP: Logged
Peech
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9272

posted 02 December 2005 05:03 PM      Profile for Peech   Author's Homepage        Edit/Delete Post
Interfaith dialogue, may be the only hope.

Breaking Faith

quote:
Breaking faith

By Tom Sandborn-contributing writer

On a mild, damp evening in late October, the Muslim faithful are gathered in Vancouver's Masjid ul-Haqq, an East Side mosque, for prayers celebrating the holy month of Ramadan. Upstairs in the converted Jehovah's Witness church building on Welwyn Street, Muslim men and boys from around the world stand shoulder to shoulder in rows on the broad green and tan stripes of the room's carpet. They face an alcove framed in marble facing, the only rich note in the room's otherwise austere appearance. They kneel, prostrate themselves, touch the floor with their foreheads and stand reverently again as the ancient Koranic suras are chanted.

A young man in a striped, hooded robe leads the prayers tonight. His rich, resonant baritone rises and falls in the ancient liturgical music that has sounded for nearly 14 centuries wherever the faithful gather to pray. Occasionally, his voice falters for a beat, and a deep, quiet voice from among the worshippers takes up the verse and leads the young man through the passage.

The guiding voice comes from an imposing figure in long, flowing African robes. He is Imam Fode Drame, a Senegalese scholar and cleric, the mosque's imam, or prayer leader, since January 2001.

Timeless and moving, even for a visiting journalist with no faith whatsoever, the serene tone of the Ramadan prayer service belies the fact that the worshipers and their imam are key figures in a storm of religious controversy.


[ 02 December 2005: Message edited by: Peech ]


From: Babbling Brook | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged
Clog-boy
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11061

posted 02 December 2005 10:53 PM      Profile for Clog-boy   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
As for the islamophobia increasing in Holland: Yes, it definitely is happening. I blame the media for it.
As most of you probably know, we had an filmmaker killed by a radical muslim. They even defined it as a terrorist-attck, although I couldn't really grasp what was terrorist about it. To me, it was a blatant murder over differences in opinions.
But the media kept covering it, over and over. You couldn't turn on your telly without a reporter or anchorman talking about terrosrism, muslims and the danger the radical ones pose.
If you keep repeating the message, some words will stick. They most likely words will be: muslim, terrorist, murderer, wacko.
If you repeat it often enough, the people will start to believe it.

I think the media split our society instead of bringing it closer together.


From: Arnhem, The Netherlands | Registered: Nov 2005  |  IP: Logged
Carter
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8667

posted 03 December 2005 09:38 AM      Profile for Carter        Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Critical Mass2:
The majority of Canadians also expressed support for better safeguards for civil liberties for Muslim citizens as a way of making sure that any necessary anti-terrorism measures did not go overboard and target innocent people.
Well, good for them. You could also add that the majority of Britons oppose the Iraq war, the majority of Americans are in favor of timely delivery of food and water to hurricane zones, etc. The trouble is the radical disconnect between what the people support and what the government supports. Surely you don't think that parliamentary elections are sufficient to square the two very divergent sets of interests?

Besides, government and the media are usually pretty skilled at all of the sudden making people think they want something that they never wanted before (ie, "overboard" anti-terrorism measures). I'm not saying there's really a danger of a new holocaust (the article might have done without that title, I agree). But there is a danger of a new Japanese-internment-type situation. In fact, Michelle Malkin wrote a book explicitly defending Roosevelt's internment policies and advocating their use in the "war on terror" today. Admittedly, she was premature: The US has not yet moved beyond the stage in which the government needs to camouflage such measures with fancy-sounding names like "material witness warrants." But who knows how far off that day might or might not be?

quote:
Any tensions in Canada have pitted rigthwing Muslims against liberal and leftwing Muslims and their allies, such as in the sharia tribunal case.
That's a rather reductionist description of the Sharia tribunal issue, don't you think? In fact, wasn't the whole point of the New Statesman article that Islamophobia often tends to be expressed in precisely such "liberal" terms? Such as, "well, I have nothing against Muslims as long as they walk, talk, and dress exactly like us tolerant Europeans... it's the right-wing, religious ones who wear funny headscarves and build those unsightly Mosques that I want to deport."

From: Goin' Down the Road | Registered: Mar 2005  |  IP: Logged
Ichy Smith
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 10594

posted 03 December 2005 02:02 PM      Profile for Ichy Smith     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Carter:
That's a rather reductionist description of the Sharia tribunal issue, don't you think? In fact, wasn't the whole point of the New Statesman article that Islamophobia often tends to be expressed in precisely such "liberal" terms? Such as, "well, I have nothing against Muslims as long as they walk, talk, and dress exactly like us tolerant Europeans... it's the right-wing, religious ones who wear funny headscarves and build those unsightly Mosques that I want to deport."

I wasn't aware of Religious courts, but once the discussion of them started, I could not believe that in a socalled modern society such a thing would exist. It is bad enough we let religious people run schools, but a court system based on religious beliefs, That is one of the dumbest ideas I have ever heard. None of the religions represented is known for it's pregressive views, and most of their religious views shouldn't have any force in law. Legal matters should be handled by governments. And things like support and child custody should never be decided by a religious court.

[ 03 December 2005: Message edited by: Ichy Smith ]


From: ontario | Registered: Oct 2005  |  IP: Logged
Peech
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9272

posted 03 December 2005 06:30 PM      Profile for Peech   Author's Homepage        Edit/Delete Post
Moernization of Islam
quote:
"Imam Fode is a man of immense erudition, wisdom and compassion," she said. "He is a remarkable mentor for young Muslims. Many of my students pray at Masjid ul-Haqq and study with the imam, and he steers them toward knowledge and compassion, urging them to embrace their tradition while reaching out to others. Imam Fode is deeply traditional, deeply rooted in classical Islamic jurisprudence, philology and exegesis. At the same time he is very progressive in his courageous interfaith work. I only hope this trouble can be resolved soon without creating polarization," she said.

The Courier asked Drame about his supporters' speculation that his troubles stem from racism within the BCMA leadership or from unease

about his encouragement of Muslim women to study and attend the mosque. Looking weary and sad, sipping mint tea in the modest stucco cottage behind Masjid ul-Haqq last week, Drame spoke carefully.

"I would not rule out racism as a contributing factor in this situation, but other factors, I think, supersede-factors like doctrinal differences," he said. "The leadership of the BCMA is inclined toward Wahhabi teachings, and that is a major factor. The BCMA has received Saudi money in the past, and with that money comes pressure to support Wahhabi teachings." (Wahhabi or Salafist Islam is a "back to basics" fundamentalist current within Islam based on the teachings of Muhammad Ibn Abd al Wahhab, an Arab religious reformer from the 18th century.)

"Racism is not open in this situation, but it is present," he added. "I have had Association leaders say to me that they would prefer that the imam be from Pakistan or India, and at least one leader in the Association, I am told, refuses to refer to me by name. He will only say 'the black imam' when he speaks of me." Drame would not identify the Association leader who made the comment.


[ 03 December 2005: Message edited by: Peech ]


From: Babbling Brook | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged
rsfarrell
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7770

posted 03 December 2005 09:52 PM      Profile for rsfarrell        Edit/Delete Post
I have always found it interesting that while people tend to identify Islam as "religion most likely to massacre unbelievers" the experience of the last twenty years is sort of the opposite:

*Anti-Muslim pogroms in India have claimed thousands of lives -- 3,000 Muslims were murdered in a single incident (in Gujarat, in 1992).

*Thousands of Muslim men and boys were murdered in Bosnia, thousands of women were raped.

*Israel continues to murder civilians, destroy homes, and seize land in a classic ethnic cleansing pattern.

While Muslim extremists have done and are doing many terrible things, and Arab nationalists, who are mostly Muslim, are commiting genocide in Darfur, mass killings of Muslims, mass rapes, and ethnic cleansing of Muslims are not speculative future scernerios; they have occured and are occuring today.

It's to be hoped that tolerence of these acts elsewhere in the world does not indicate a willingness to carry them out in Europe and America, but it is reasonable to be vigilant. If 6,000 Muslim men and boys can be put to death at the doorstep of Europe, under its soliders' eyes, what might not happen?


From: Portland, Oregon | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
Reason
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9504

posted 04 December 2005 12:15 AM      Profile for Reason   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by rsfarrell:
I have always found it interesting that while people tend to identify Islam as "religion most likely to massacre unbelievers" the experience of the last twenty years is sort of the opposite:

*Anti-Muslim pogroms in India have claimed thousands of lives -- 3,000 Muslims were murdered in a single incident (in Gujarat, in 1992).

*Thousands of Muslim men and boys were murdered in Bosnia, thousands of women were raped.

*Israel continues to murder civilians, destroy homes, and seize land in a classic ethnic cleansing pattern.

While Muslim extremists have done and are doing many terrible things, and Arab nationalists, who are mostly Muslim, are commiting genocide in Darfur, mass killings of Muslims, mass rapes, and ethnic cleansing of Muslims are not speculative future scernerios; they have occured and are occuring today.

It's to be hoped that tolerence of these acts elsewhere in the world does not indicate a willingness to carry them out in Europe and America, but it is reasonable to be vigilant. If 6,000 Muslim men and boys can be put to death at the doorstep of Europe, under its soliders' eyes, what might not happen?


Most people who have been exposed to the faith discover very quickly that the Muslim faith is one of love and charity.

The real message that has to go out at this time, is that any religion is capable of being perverted to someone's desires and greed. We must teaching acceptance, and demand tolerance, otherwise we leave ourselves open to another tragedy like the slaughter at Srebencia.

The christian church, has been as guilty, if not more so of the kinds atrocities being attributed to a handfull of islamic extremists. One only has to look to Ireland for more recent such events.

Perhaps a suggestion. Some here cringe at the very idea of religion. I some times do myself. But it is inescapable that religion plays a huge part in many lives. I noticed recently on Toronto news, members of a mosque there were handing out food to the needy during the celebration of Id-al-Fitr (spelling?).

I know well that there are those that do not like taking their religion public... But more good PR like that goes a long way. In this day and age, as shallow as it sounds, good public image can do a lot of good for a people.


From: Ontario | Registered: Jun 2005  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 04 December 2005 01:32 PM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
I think we can thank the CIA and British hawks for propping-up our worst fears of Islam. Let's face it, world peace just isn't as profitable as instilling mass hysteria among the taxpaying public, their bread and butter. The public should maintain sufficient levels of adrenaline as a constant reminder of who they should fear. Besides, Muhammed taught them that usury and rent are evil - the real reason we need to fear them. Islam and capitalism are incompatible.
From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
lagatta
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2534

posted 04 December 2005 01:40 PM      Profile for lagatta     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
I don't like any form of religious fundamentalism. Tolerance of freedom of conscience does not mean an equivalency between progressive and reactionary currents found in all communities and faith groups.
From: Se non ora, quando? | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 04 December 2005 01:55 PM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
I think capitalism is a form of fundamentalism and is intolerant of just about everything that can't be marketed. Islamists don't believe in flashy living, and that just doesn't jive with the culture that says your sole purpose in life is to shop till you drop. They must be broken of their ways - all one billion of them.
From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
Ghost of the Navigator
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11029

posted 04 December 2005 03:17 PM      Profile for Ghost of the Navigator        Edit/Delete Post
Ethnic Dutch are among the most socially libeal people in the world.

Muslims immigrating to the Netherlands are among the most socially conservative.

Of course there'd be problems.


From: Canada | Registered: Nov 2005  |  IP: Logged
jeff house
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 518

posted 04 December 2005 03:34 PM      Profile for jeff house     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Ethnic Dutch are among the most socially libeal people in the world.
Muslims immigrating to the Netherlands are among the most socially conservative.

Of course there'd be problems.


Muslims immigrating to the Netherlands often come from Indonesia, which was a Dutch colony. I wonder
whether anyone cared about the conflict of values when the Dutch imposed their mores on that alien society.


From: toronto | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Yst
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9749

posted 04 December 2005 04:23 PM      Profile for Yst     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by jeff house:

Muslims immigrating to the Netherlands often come from Indonesia, which was a Dutch colony. I wonder
whether anyone cared about the conflict of values when the Dutch imposed their mores on that alien society.


Why are Babble threads so prone to these whacky red herrings?

Yes, colonialism was bad. We're pretty clear on that. There's not much debate surrounding the topic at present. So piping in to declare that colonialism was bad in a discussion about present day Dutch domestic politics contributes precisely nothing to the discourse. It's the progressive equivalent of "won't somebody please think of the chilren!" Even if it was open to debate it would contribute absolutely nothing.


From: State of Genderfuck | Registered: Jun 2005  |  IP: Logged
rsfarrell
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7770

posted 04 December 2005 07:46 PM      Profile for rsfarrell        Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Yst:

Why are Babble threads so prone to these whacky red herrings?

Yes, colonialism was bad. We're pretty clear on that. There's not much debate surrounding the topic at present. So piping in to declare that colonialism was bad in a discussion about present day Dutch domestic politics contributes precisely nothing to the discourse. It's the progressive equivalent of "won't somebody please think of the chilren!" Even if it was open to debate it would contribute absolutely nothing.


Much as I admire the Simpsons reference, (although to be complete, it should include an illustration:

"Won't somebody please think of the children?")

. . . but it is relevant to point out that a lot of the immigration to Europe is backwash from their former colonies. It puts a slightly different spin on the relentless Muslim horde ravishing the cultural innocence of Europe.

[ 04 December 2005: Message edited by: rsfarrell ]


From: Portland, Oregon | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
Brett Mann
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6441

posted 05 December 2005 12:14 AM      Profile for Brett Mann        Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by lagatta:
I don't like any form of religious fundamentalism. Tolerance of freedom of conscience does not mean an equivalency between progressive and reactionary currents found in all communities and faith groups.

Well said Lagatta. I'd like to see it on a T shirt but there's too many words.


From: Prince Edward County ON | Registered: Jul 2004  |  IP: Logged
lagatta
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2534

posted 05 December 2005 12:15 PM      Profile for lagatta     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Fidel, several years ago Alternatives organised a conference "Contre les intégrismes" (Against Fundamentalisms) and the fundamentalism of the free market (TINA) was definitely among them.

However, you've confused Muslim or Islamic and ISLAMIST - the latter term refers to the political use of Islam, usually in a fundamentalist direction. There are a billion Muslims (or people of Muslim culture) on the planet. There are far fewer Islamists, and many Muslims, even quite a few devout Muslims, are opposed to the outlook and actions of many Islamists.


From: Se non ora, quando? | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged
Boarsbreath
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9831

posted 06 December 2005 10:36 PM      Profile for Boarsbreath   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
A small point, re this from rsfarrell:
quote:
Arab nationalists, who are mostly Muslim, are commiting genocide in Darfur,

You can't tell the difference betwen the "Arabs" and the "black Africans" in Darfur by looking at them; it's misleading (on the part of our media) to talk about the situation as though it were Arabs and Bantu. And everyone there is Muslim, victims too.

From: South Seas, ex Montreal | Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged
Reason
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9504

posted 06 December 2005 11:59 PM      Profile for Reason   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Boarsbreath:
A small point, re this from rsfarrell:

You can't tell the difference betwen the "Arabs" and the "black Africans" in Darfur by looking at them; it's misleading (on the part of our media) to talk about the situation as though it were Arabs and Bantu. And everyone there is Muslim, victims too.

Aye, Sudan is a right bleeding mess now. The AU for some reason thought they could make a go at peacekeeping without armoured support (I mean light armoured support). I do not think there is a single armed entity there that is supporting of the idea of peace (aside from the peacekeepers from the AU).

Numbers of AU peacekeepers in Sudan are going up, and now they have armoured support in the form of old refurbished Canadian Grizzlies (APCs). They will now have the mobility necessary to move about and try to instill some order in chaos (which describes everything outside of Khartum).


From: Ontario | Registered: Jun 2005  |  IP: Logged
rsfarrell
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7770

posted 07 December 2005 06:13 AM      Profile for rsfarrell        Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Reason:

Numbers of AU peacekeepers in Sudan are going up, and now they have armoured support in the form of old refurbished Canadian Grizzlies (APCs). They will now have the mobility necessary to move about and try to instill some order in chaos (which describes everything outside of Khartum).


Godspeed. So my guns in this world, so many angry men, but just where you could use them in a good cause, and it's like getting blood from a stone [insert predictable Yeats quote].


From: Portland, Oregon | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
Vigilante
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8104

posted 07 December 2005 01:31 PM      Profile for Vigilante        Edit/Delete Post
The KoiSan
From: Toronto | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
Free Slave
recent-rabble-rouser
Babbler # 10249

posted 07 December 2005 03:22 PM      Profile for Free Slave        Edit/Delete Post
Islamophobia: unease or fear of Muslims based only on a large number of Islamic people laying waste to a nation with mind-boggling levels of crime, violence, attack on police, theft, burning of cars and homes.

Someone should tell the police in France who are trying to stop widespread Muslim rioting that they are suffering from Islamophobia, that they should put down their riot shields and embrace the clubs and molotov cocktails with open arms, lest France forgets history and a Holocaust of Muslims begins.


From: Canada | Registered: Aug 2005  |  IP: Logged
Reason
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9504

posted 07 December 2005 05:46 PM      Profile for Reason   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Free Slave:
Islamophobia: unease or fear of Muslims based only on a large number of Islamic people laying waste to a nation with mind-boggling levels of crime, violence, attack on police, theft, burning of cars and homes.

Someone should tell the police in France who are trying to stop widespread Muslim rioting that they are suffering from Islamophobia, that they should put down their riot shields and embrace the clubs and molotov cocktails with open arms, lest France forgets history and a Holocaust of Muslims begins.


Hmmm, me thinks that your understanding is lacking... Along with your compassion. Comparing the youths, and others in the ghettos of France with Islamic terrorists will not win you much points here.

I recommend you get out and see a little bit more of the world before you go flopping out your generalisations like that. Makes right wingers like me feel uncomfortable.


From: Ontario | Registered: Jun 2005  |  IP: Logged
Makwa
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 10724

posted 07 December 2005 06:30 PM      Profile for Makwa   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Reason:
Hmmm, me thinks that your understanding is lacking... Along with your compassion. Comparing the youths, and others in the ghettos of France with Islamic terrorists will not win you much points here.
Dag. Soon they're gonna send FBI infiltrators into NDN meetings, like they did at the country wide caravan on Ottawa my Uncle helped to organize in 1974. Dam' terr'rists under every bush. Bush. Get it?

From: Here at the glass - all the usual problems, the habitual farce | Registered: Oct 2005  |  IP: Logged
Reason
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9504

posted 07 December 2005 10:45 PM      Profile for Reason   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Makwa:
Dag. Soon they're gonna send FBI infiltrators into NDN meetings, like they did at the country wide caravan on Ottawa my Uncle helped to organize in 1974. Dam' terr'rists under every bush. Bush. Get it?


hehe...

Thanks, needed that chuckle.


From: Ontario | Registered: Jun 2005  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 08 December 2005 05:08 AM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by lagatta:
However, you've confused Muslim or Islamic and ISLAMIST - the latter term refers to the political use of Islam, usually in a fundamentalist direction.

Well, I'm never usually one to haggle over word meanings, but dictionary.com says "Islamist" can describe any one of 1.3 billion believers or followers of Islam.

For example, I think that would necessarily include certain Islamists in Afghanistan who were recipients of CIA military aid in the 1980's and who eventually brought down the Soviet-backed PDPA government about two years after the Soviets packed up and left. Did the CIA and US Dept. of Agriculture exploit and create a monstor of this most violent branch of Islamic fundamentalism, militant-Islam ?.

I get the feeling we'd see a form of militant Taoism if the military industrial complex became so hard up for enemies. They could extort protection money from American taxpayers for at least ten years - and longer if the would-be Washington-friendly dictator is fitted up properly with forged documents and corporate-sponsored news media lies next time around around.


From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
ceti
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7851

posted 08 December 2005 11:37 AM      Profile for ceti     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
The problem is the way history is written.

Maps have long depicted an expansionary faith, with successive dynasties threatening to overwhelm the frontiers of Europe from the battle of Tours to Vienna. Similarly, Indian textbooks are being rewritten to emphasize the enormous vandalism and depredations that ostensibly Islamic invaders wrought over Northern India over the same period.

Now, the fear of poltical Islam organizing all the non-white oppressed masses in the long-expected North-South showdown is being stoked to propel Europe's rightward shift (in both new and old Europe -- this I feel is the subtext to their willing participation in Bush's Wars).

For all its faults, the film Kingdom of Heaven actually on the balance helped in correcting the views on the Crusades, where Christian crusaders actually committed a hell of a lot more atrocities (like eating people, murdering Jews, and causing general mayhem) than their Muslim counterparts. That the conquistadors of the Americas were veterans of the Christian reconquest of Spain by Isabel and Ferdinand in the late 1400s, also should point to how colonialism intersects with this old story.

Thus our task must be to overcome both the economic determinism of capitalism and the civilizational wars brought about by dueling fundamentalisms and nationalisms.


From: various musings before the revolution | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged
Blind_Patriot
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3830

posted 08 December 2005 01:46 PM      Profile for Blind_Patriot     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
This article by Harold Pinter is relevant to this thread, yet warrants it own.
quote:
I put to you that the United States is without doubt the greatest show on the road. Brutal, indifferent, scornful and ruthless it may be but it is also very clever. As a salesman it is out on its own and its most saleable commodity is self love. It's a winner. Listen to all American presidents on television say the words, 'the American people', as in the sentence, 'I say to the American people it is time to pray and to defend the rights of the American people and I ask the American people to trust their president in the action he is about to take on behalf of the American people.'
Art, Truth & Politics - Nobel Speech - Harold Pinter

[ 08 December 2005: Message edited by: Blind_Patriot ]


From: North Of The Authoritarian Regime | Registered: Mar 2003  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 08 December 2005 01:50 PM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by ceti:
Thus our task must be to overcome both the economic determinism of capitalism and the civilizational wars brought about by dueling fundamentalisms and nationalisms.

Yes. And I after reading some comments near the top about North America being immune to this sort of thing, we should remember that occasionally it was western-based nationals who have profited from war in Asia and Europe. It's easy to cast apersions at billions of people who live on top of one another while our own country, rich in natural wealth and living space, is set aside and held back for the benefit of foreign-based corporate marauders. I lived through the ice storm of 1998 in Ottawa. I saw how Canadian's can turn ugly when faced with the teensiest bit of inconvenience. People had their home power generators stolen, and the newspapers were filled with misdirected animosity. And to make matters worse, the city had contracted-out highway maintenance and the highway outta town sometimes got sanded on time for rush hour. On my drive to Arnprior every a.m., a minimum of 13 cars slid off the road and into the ditch. Foreigners would have thought we were kidding with all the bitching and carry on at the time.

And look at what successive autocratic Liberal governments have gotten away with in this country for 75 of the last 100 years. Canadian's wouldn't say "shit" if they had a mouthful. Imagine if we were faced with a Hitler or an out of control shadow government like our southern neighbors have had to endure. Canadian's wouldn't know whether to shit or get drunk and watch the fuckin hockey game.

[ 08 December 2005: Message edited by: Fidel ]


From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca