Author
|
Topic: Spam Doubles, Finding New Ways to Deliver Itself
|
Snuckles
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2764
|
posted 06 December 2006 07:07 PM
quote: By BRAD STONE Published: December 6, 2006Hearing from a lot of new friends lately? You know, the ones that write “It’s me, Esmeralda,” and tip you off to an obscure stock that is “poised to explode” or a great deal on prescription drugs. You’re not the only one. Spam is back — in e-mail in-boxes and on everyone’s minds. In the last six months, the problem has gotten measurably worse. Worldwide spam volumes have doubled from last year, according to Ironport, a spam filtering firm, and unsolicited junk mail now accounts for more than 9 of every 10 e-mail messages sent over the Internet. Much of that flood is made up of a nettlesome new breed of junk e-mail called image spam, in which the words of the advertisement are part of a picture, often fooling traditional spam detectors that look for telltale phrases. Image spam increased fourfold from last year and now represents 25 to 45 percent of all junk e-mail, depending on the day, Ironport says. The antispam industry is struggling to keep up with the surge. It is adding computer power and developing new techniques in an effort to avoid losing the battle with the most sophisticated spammers.
Read it here.
From: Hell | Registered: Jun 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noise
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12603
|
posted 07 December 2006 09:08 AM
quote: It doesn't explain the gibberish email, though.
Most of spam email is orginating from locations where English isn't the primary language. Hehe, you've seen some poorly translated foriegn products (I recently got an email full of them in a joke email ring... Theres an image of a bag of candy labelled "Shito Mix : Traditionally Recipe, New improved Shito!" written on it)... Some of these gibberish emails are simply exceedingly poorly translated english lacking most forms of grammar. Heh, imagine what it'd look like if you wrote up a spam email to send to everyone... In Icelandic or Romanian. quote: There must be a way to track it. And the spammers should be prosecuted with the full force of the law. Honestly, what are they thinking?
Full force of the law doesn't help much when the spam problem is a global issue and the spam laws enforced are by nation. Most spam does not originate from locations that have applicable laws. quote: If you get one of these a day, you're getting at least 15. It's like getting 15 vacuum cleaner salespeople coming to your door every day. Do they think this is a great way to sell stuff? No.
If 1 in a million are stupid enough to beleive this (which I think is underestimating human stupidity), then simple statistics will show all you need to do is send it to 1 million people.
From: Protest is Patriotism | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
Howard R. Hamilton
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12868
|
posted 07 December 2006 03:47 PM
Just to add some statistics to the fire:As a small ISP, I deliver about 5500-6500 emails a day to about 650 clients. I am not sure what percentage of these are SPAM, but it is over 80%. I also reject over 1,000,000 messages a day that are "mis-directed SPAM" that is being sent to non-existant email addresses in my domain. So that means, in actuallity, that I am receiving over 99.8% SPAM at my email server.
From: Saskatchewan | Registered: Jul 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312
|
posted 07 December 2006 07:15 PM
Nothing? Let me introduce you to greylisting.It is miracle cure if you control your own mail server. You just place a cheap linux box running postfix in front of your default mail server, add a sender_access to whitelist listserves and blacklist commercial emailers (legitimate spammers like staples, air canada, etc ... maybe you want to keep them too) and voila! Your spam is reduced 95% overnight and, and, you have protection against mail bombs to boot (greylisting denies spam at the door requiring very little processor time). Total cost: 1 box and about 2 hours of your time. 30 mins if you have a linux box up and ready to go. Complaints? At first, one or two. Some mail senders will complain about thier mail being bounced. Either white list them, or explain your spam controls. After about six months, no complaints and very little spam. Best of all, no lost mail and no user interaction required. Try it! What do you have to lose? [ 07 December 2006: Message edited by: Frustrated Mess ]
From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Stargazer
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6061
|
posted 12 December 2006 03:58 AM
quote: Nothing? Let me introduce you to greylisting.It is miracle cure if you control your own mail server. You just place a cheap linux box running postfix in front of your default mail server, add a sender_access to whitelist listserves and blacklist commercial emailers (legitimate spammers like staples, air canada, etc ... maybe you want to keep them too) and voila! Your spam is reduced 95% overnight and, and, you have protection against mail bombs to boot (greylisting denies spam at the door requiring very little processor time).
Thanks FM, but we already have such a system. My issue is not that we get a lot of spam, but that we have so much spam we have got to have a person going through it every day. Sometimes, regardless of white lists or blacklists, things get caught as false positives, and some things get caught in potential spam/content holders specifically because they are zipped files or password protected. Given the industry I work in, not having someone go through the false positives could potentially mean a lost deal worth a lot of money.
From: Inside every cynical person, there is a disappointed idealist. | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|