babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » right brain babble   » humanities & science   » Did this German fighter pilot kill a children's literary hero?

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Did this German fighter pilot kill a children's literary hero?
Webgear
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9443

posted 17 March 2008 02:38 PM      Profile for Webgear     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
If only he had known. Now, in the winter of his life, an elderly German war veteran has stepped forward to say he believes he shot down his literary idol - Antoine de Saint-Exupéry, author of the beloved children's tale, The Little Prince.

"If I had known, I wouldn't have fired - not on him," said the 88-year-old former Luftwaffe fighter pilot Horst Rippert."


From: Montgomery's Tavern | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged
martin dufresne
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11463

posted 17 March 2008 03:22 PM      Profile for martin dufresne   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
If not on him, on who?
Of course, the people killed by today's fighter pilots and altitude bombers are probably not any literary giants - and certainly not from a noble French family. They are mere Afghani/Iraki/Palestinian civilians, and there is little chance that an Alliance vet will someday step forward - or garner any media attention - to express regrets for their murders.

[ 17 March 2008: Message edited by: martin dufresne ]


From: "Words Matter" (Mackinnon) | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
Webgear
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9443

posted 17 March 2008 04:01 PM      Profile for Webgear     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Herr Rippert must have great difficult in knowing that he killed a great literary individual, especially one he respected so greatly.

I am sure many people have regrets about their wartime experiences. Personally, I do not care for regrets and misgivings because I believe one’s actions depend on that moment of time.

If you believe at the time of the incident, that your actions are justifiable and moral then you have no regrets or misgivings.


From: Montgomery's Tavern | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged
Cueball
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4790

posted 17 March 2008 04:20 PM      Profile for Cueball   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Well there is no doubt in my mind that this litterary hero would have killed Rippert, had he the chance. Likely he would have considered it a good day.

[ 17 March 2008: Message edited by: Cueball ]


From: Out from under the bridge and out for a stroll | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
Le Téléspectateur
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7126

posted 17 March 2008 04:35 PM      Profile for Le Téléspectateur     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
If you believe at the time of the incident, that your actions are justifiable and moral then you have no regrets or misgivings.

That's what the military teaches anyhow. Which probably explains the PTSS and other serious effects of dehumanizing people into killing machines for suits in Ottawa's video game vision of war.

If that's how you deal with it fine but you need to acknowledge that there is a reason that you find yourself in certain "incidents" when you are in the military.


From: More here than there | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged
Webgear
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9443

posted 17 March 2008 05:45 PM      Profile for Webgear     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Le Téléspectateur:

That's what the military teaches anyhow. Which probably explains the PTSS and other serious effects of dehumanizing people into killing machines for suits in Ottawa's video game vision of war.

If that's how you deal with it fine but you need to acknowledge that there is a reason that you find yourself in certain "incidents" when you are in the military.


What does the military teach? What manual or doctrine are you referring to?

Very few people in the Canadian military have combat experience. I would speculate that less than 3000 soldiers in the Canadian military have any serious combat experience.

There are very few “killing machines” in Canada.

Yes, I acknowledge military personnel will always be in incidents beyond there control, that is the nature of the beast. Politicians never have the soldiers best interest at heart when making decisions.


From: Montgomery's Tavern | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged
Proaxiom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6188

posted 18 March 2008 04:13 AM      Profile for Proaxiom     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Webgear:
Yes, I acknowledge military personnel will always be in incidents beyond there control, that is the nature of the beast. Politicians never have the soldiers best interest at heart when making decisions.

Indeed, like all the Imperial Army bureaucrats on the first Death Star. They probably thought they had a pretty damn safe posting. How were they to know about a small thermal exhaust port that, when hit by proton torpedo, would trigger a chain reaction and destroy the battlestation?

That's how it goes, though. Budget cuts, skills shortages, and it's too easy to skip over the required security design audit before starting construction on a planet-destroying superweapon.

[ 18 March 2008: Message edited by: Proaxiom ]


From: East of the Sun, West of the Moon | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
Webgear
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9443

posted 18 March 2008 02:08 PM      Profile for Webgear     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Proaxiom:

Indeed, like all the Imperial Army bureaucrats on the first Death Star. They probably thought they had a pretty damn safe posting. How were they to know about a small thermal exhaust port that, when hit by proton torpedo, would trigger a chain reaction and destroy the battlestation?

That's how it goes, though. Budget cuts, skills shortages, and it's too easy to skip over the required security design audit before starting construction on a planet-destroying superweapon.


If the Imperial Navy employed a proper screening fleet such as Corellian Gunships and Lancer-class Star Frigates along with Imperator-class Star Destroyers around the Death Star, then a hand full of Rebel fighters would never have been a serious threat.

Once the Rebel X-Wing fighters and Y-Wing Bombers appear, Lord Vader or the Duty Officer should have immediately launched the TIE fighters to provide a screen around the vulnerable exhaust port thus providing another layer of defence to the space station.

Imperial bureaucrats most likely did not have a clue about the military and had most likely design a huge layer of paperwork and procedures in order to make the military more productive which in fact provided to be the exacted opposite of their intentions.


From: Montgomery's Tavern | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged
Proaxiom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6188

posted 18 March 2008 02:25 PM      Profile for Proaxiom     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Webgear:
If the Imperial Navy employed a proper screening fleet such as Corellian Gunships and Lancer-class Star Frigates along with Imperator-class Star Destroyers around the Death Star, then a hand full of Rebel fighters would never have been a serious threat.

Now if the Imperial government had thought to unify the commands, maybe this would have been feasible. When you've just extorted a rebel leader into giving you their base location, you don't have time to get all the required approvals to initiate a joint action, and then try to negotiate an operational plan with all those egos at the table. You have to move before the rebels figure out the game is up and move their base.

quote:
Once the Rebel X-Wing fighters and Y-Wing Bombers appear, Lord Vader or the Duty Officer should have immediately launched the TIE fighters to provide a screen around the vulnerable exhaust port thus providing another layer of defence to the space station.

They didn't know about the exhaust port until after the fighter attack was analyzed. And given that it took them all of about 12 minutes, you'd think they might have gone through the effort before they were actually under attack. That's design by committee for you.

quote:
Imperial bureaucrats most likely did not have a clue about the military and had most likely design a huge layer of paperwork and procedures in order to make the military more productive which in fact provided to be the exacted opposite of their intentions.

They thought an AT-AT and Stormtrooper 'surge' would take care of the problem.


From: East of the Sun, West of the Moon | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
Webgear
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9443

posted 18 March 2008 03:34 PM      Profile for Webgear     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Proaxiom:

Now if the Imperial government had thought to unify the commands, maybe this would have been feasible. When you've just extorted a rebel leader into giving you their base location, you don't have time to get all the required approvals to initiate a joint action, and then try to negotiate an operational plan with all those egos at the table. You have to move before the rebels figure out the game is up and move their base.

The Imperial Navy had a unified chain of command; there should have not been a delay in orders or operational planning. The lack of proper defensive measures around the Death Star is the result of civilian bureaucrats interfering in military matters.

quote:


They didn't know about the exhaust port until after the fighter attack was analyzed. And given that it took them all of about 12 minutes, you'd think they might have gone through the effort before they were actually under attack. That's design by committee for you.

Regardless of the knowledge of weakness of the exhaust port, standard military procedures were not carried out, screening ships around a command ship is common military procedure in any blue, brown or space navy.

quote:


They thought an AT-AT and Stormtrooper 'surge' would take care of the problem.

At the Battle of Hoth, the surge of Imperial troops did take care of the Rebel threat. The lost of Echo Base was a devastating loss got the Rebellion, the lost of equipment, personnel which prolonged the conflict longer than what was necessary.


From: Montgomery's Tavern | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged
rural - Francesca
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14858

posted 22 March 2008 03:53 AM      Profile for rural - Francesca   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I finally understand the Iraq war now.
From: the backyard | Registered: Dec 2007  |  IP: Logged
Proaxiom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6188

posted 22 March 2008 05:11 AM      Profile for Proaxiom     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I have been soundly out-geeked by Webgear.
From: East of the Sun, West of the Moon | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
Webgear
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9443

posted 22 March 2008 05:24 AM      Profile for Webgear     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Proaxiom:

I have been soundly out-geeked by Webgear.

Webgear is performing a victory dance at this moment as he tries to get his 3 overly happy kids in to the van in order for them to meet their new sister at the hospital.


From: Montgomery's Tavern | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged
Proaxiom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6188

posted 22 March 2008 06:08 AM      Profile for Proaxiom     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Congratulations!

Four kids??


From: East of the Sun, West of the Moon | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
rural - Francesca
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14858

posted 22 March 2008 06:15 AM      Profile for rural - Francesca   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
which brings us to the Ja-wa portion of the scenario...dink dink.....
From: the backyard | Registered: Dec 2007  |  IP: Logged
Bacchus
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4722

posted 22 March 2008 06:10 PM      Profile for Bacchus     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Congrats Webgear!!!!
From: n/a | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
Webgear
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9443

posted 22 March 2008 08:34 PM      Profile for Webgear     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Baby girl, 7 pounds 12 ounces, 20 inches long (30 days early), both mother and daughter are doing fine.

The other kids (two girls, one boy) are more like Wookies in Ewoks bodies, lots of hair and fury of activity and destruction around the house.

Thank you every one.


From: Montgomery's Tavern | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged
Cueball
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4790

posted 22 March 2008 08:37 PM      Profile for Cueball   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Excelent news!
From: Out from under the bridge and out for a stroll | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 22 March 2008 11:20 PM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Lovely! Congrats!
From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Proaxiom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6188

posted 23 March 2008 05:31 AM      Profile for Proaxiom     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
7 pounds 12 ounces, and 30 days early?

Yikes.


From: East of the Sun, West of the Moon | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 23 March 2008 06:24 AM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Heh. No kidding. My little one wasn't so little - he was full term, and was 10 lbs, 1 oz. I suppose if he'd been early, he'd have been in the 7 lb range too!
From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Webgear
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9443

posted 23 March 2008 10:20 AM      Profile for Webgear     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Both my daughter’s weighted in at 10 pounds 4 ounces and 10 pounds, 14 ounces.

The boy was 6 pounds and 10 ounces (he was 6 weeks early also).


From: Montgomery's Tavern | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged
pookie
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11357

posted 23 March 2008 11:57 AM      Profile for pookie     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Congratulations Webgear! I love the way you just slipped in the announcement, too.
From: there's no "there" there | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
Proaxiom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6188

posted 23 March 2008 12:00 PM      Profile for Proaxiom     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Four kids means you'll never be able to fit the family in a sedan.
From: East of the Sun, West of the Moon | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
Webgear
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9443

posted 23 March 2008 05:51 PM      Profile for Webgear     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I have started to think about my next vehicle, I have thought about a few ideas. Here is the short list for large families.

Option number one

Another possibility for a family vehicle

The last possibility if things start going bad in Canada


From: Montgomery's Tavern | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged
Proaxiom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6188

posted 23 March 2008 06:00 PM      Profile for Proaxiom     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Does the LAV III have UAS/LATCH?
From: East of the Sun, West of the Moon | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
Webgear
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9443

posted 23 March 2008 06:02 PM      Profile for Webgear     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
What is an UAS?

It does have a hatch.


From: Montgomery's Tavern | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged
Proaxiom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6188

posted 23 March 2008 06:04 PM      Profile for Proaxiom     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Anchoring system for child seats.
From: East of the Sun, West of the Moon | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
Webgear
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9443

posted 23 March 2008 06:06 PM      Profile for Webgear     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I am seriously looking at owning some horses and a wagon for short trips into town, and for being mobile in the next 9 years or so. I want to be off the gird by 2017.
From: Montgomery's Tavern | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged
Webgear
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9443

posted 23 March 2008 06:07 PM      Profile for Webgear     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Yes it does have a UAS. All the seats include 5 point seat beats also.
From: Montgomery's Tavern | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca