Author
|
Topic: "Hole Drilled to Bottom of Earth's Crust"
|
Amy
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2210
|
posted 10 April 2005 11:04 AM
quote: Scientist said this week they had drilled into the lower section of Earth's crust for the first time and were poised to break through to the mantle in coming years.... The new hole, which took nearly eight weeks to drill, is the third deepest ever made into the floor of the sea, according to the National Science Foundation (NSF). The rock collection brought back to the surface is providing new information about the planet's composition. "It will provide important clues on how ocean crust forms," said Rodey Batiza, NSF program director for ocean drilling. Already the types of rocks recovered show that conventional interpretation of Earth's evolution are "oversimplifying many of the features of the ocean’s crust," said expedition leader Jay Miller of Texas A&M University. "Each time we drill a hole, we learn that Earth’s structure is more complex. Our understanding of how the Earth evolved is changing accordingly."
I saw this link on slashdot. It's exciting! Click![ 10 April 2005: Message edited by: Amy ]
From: the whole town erupts and/ bursts into flame | Registered: Feb 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ian gregson
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8193
|
posted 10 April 2005 09:59 PM
I'm just hope the price of cheese will go down when they get to what they are drilling for.Cheese can replace fossil fuels as a great source of energy. This is why no one has been to the moon in ages, they are secretly mining all the cheese and it is running low. The cheese at the centre of the earth will probably taste fresher also, since it kinda like buying local compared to the cheese from the moon. Here's to more cheese.....
From: Republic of East Van | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Ethical Redneck
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8274
|
posted 10 April 2005 10:56 PM
quote: This is a terrible idea! They did this on Doctor Who and once they pierced the crust, everyone started turning into freakish monkey men in a quasi-fascist alternative universe!-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Would we notice the difference with George W. Bush in charge?
That's exactly what I was thinking. Ain't sumthin like this already happen in the US? quote: Maybe they'll find Rick Wakeman's career, which was last reported seen in the area.
Hey. I still got that album! I ain't listened to it in about 25 years, but I remember it well. Maybe I'll play it when they punch a hole into the mantle and Magma spirts up and fries us all. What way to go. At least it's better to burn out, like we will on that day, than to fade away, which is what Rick Wakeman did.
From: Deep in the Rockies | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Surferosad
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4791
|
posted 11 April 2005 08:10 AM
quote: Originally posted by venus_man:
Wouldn’t it cause (or already causing) an earthquake or few? Some of the ‘scientist’, for the purposes of fulfilling their sometimes egoistic curiosity, can destroy (and probably already destroying) lives and may be the Earth itself.[ 11 April 2005: Message edited by: venus_man ]
Nobody is going to use no "nucular" devices anywhere. They're using a drill very similar to the ones used for oil prospecting. Funny, I thought it was gullibility, ignorance, short term thinking and egoism who were destroying the Earth... Oh well, I guess I must be wrong. Maybe it's them damn evil power mad scientists who are doing it! They're meddling with the forces of nature! How dare they play GOD! "They LAUGHED at my theories at the institute! Fools! Fools! I'll destroy them all!" -- [ 11 April 2005: Message edited by: Surferosad ]
From: Montreal | Registered: Dec 2003
| IP: Logged
|
|
venus_man
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6131
|
posted 11 April 2005 08:35 AM
quote: Originally posted by Surferosad:
Funny, I thought it was gullibility, ignorance, short term thinking and egoism who were destroying the Earth... Oh well, I guess I must be wrong.
No, I don’t think you are wrong. And these could resurface through science, religion, new age etc. The sensitive approach in my opinion is valuable and important. It allows to be aware of the surroundings, environment, flora, fauna etc. It implies experimentation aimed towards common good, where the results would benefit great number of people in the areas of ideas, knowledge, medicine or day-to-day existence. It also calls for the equilibrium and harmony with earth’s forces and elements as well as its fragile (subtle) bio-environment. And from it stems responsibility, especially in a field of science. Otherwise, more cruel bombs, bad drugs, GMF etc.
From: outer space | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Surferosad
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4791
|
posted 11 April 2005 03:11 PM
Stop it with that "scientific evangelism" bullshit. It's bunk and it makes you look like a nutter. It's rather stupid to attack the institution just because no evidence supports some of your favourite notions. It often happened that some of my favourite ideas were totally destroyed by evidence, a colleague's objections or new information. Sometimes it's a drag, but at least it makes me feel like I'm getting somewhere, that I don't have to waste time going down blind alleys. An "honest experiment" doesn't necessarily tells you what you want to hear! Live and learn... And you're right, scientists are people too. Some of them will have ideas and support causes that we both would consider to be wrong. You can't impose a moral code on them, like you can't impose morals on other citizens. So yeah, some of them will work for the military, and some of them will create weapons... It would be great if we could know immediately all the consequences of a new invention or discovery. But we can't. Science and technology are often double edged swords. If you don't do something because of the bad things it may do, you will also miss on the good things it might bring. Tesla is not the best example of a "scientist". First, he was an engineer and inventor, not a scientist. He wasn't very interested in first principles. Like Edison, he was more into technological applications. Second, he was a bit of a crank. [ 11 April 2005: Message edited by: Surferosad ]
From: Montreal | Registered: Dec 2003
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Tommy_Paine
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 214
|
posted 11 April 2005 04:59 PM
There's no mystery about Rick Wakeman's career. He's currently half way through a thirty year sentence for "gratuitous use of a synthesizer, with malice of forethought".How big in diameter is the hole? How big is the earth? I'm not sure we can drill a hole large enough in diameter to make any significant effect on the globe. Myself, I'd be drilling another hole beside it, and intersecting them at the bottom, and filling it up with water, with a generator on the top. We need all the electricity we can get to keep those billboards illuminated through the wee hours of the night, so five or six people can see them, and be adequately advertized at. [ 11 April 2005: Message edited by: Tommy_Paine ]
From: The Alley, Behind Montgomery's Tavern | Registered: Apr 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|