babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » right brain babble   » humanities & science   » Dover ID bill: $1M

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Dover ID bill: $1M
Snuckles
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2764

posted 22 February 2006 05:58 AM      Profile for Snuckles   Author's Homepage        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
By LAURI LEBO and MICHELLE STARR
Daily Record/Sunday News

Feb 22, 2006 — The Dover Area school board voted Tuesday night to pay $1 million in legal fees to the attorneys that successfully sued the district over its intelligent-design policy.

In addition, each of the 11 plaintiffs will also receive $1 in nominal damages.

Eight of the nine board members voted in favor while Bryan Rehm, who is also a plaintiff, abstained.

The vote somewhat puts an end to one of the district's most contentious chapters, and, as plaintiff Cyndi Sneath said "lets us catch our breath and move on.". . .

. . . The $1 million figure was the result of an agreement worked out between plaintiffs' attorneys and the district's solicitor. In exchange, the board agrees it will not appeal.

As part of U.S. Judge John E. Jones III's decision, in which he ruled Dover's intelligent-design policy unconstitutional, plaintiffs' attorneys were permitted to recoup legal fees and expenses.

Even though they have agreed on the settlement, Eric Rothschild, the plaintiffs' lead attorney, said lawyers will request an order in court entitling the plaintiffs to more than $2 million in costs.

Steve Russell, the district's solicitor, said the initial bill had been $2.5 million before negotiations began.


Read it here.


From: Hell | Registered: Jun 2002  |  IP: Logged
Mr. Magoo
guilty-pleasure
Babbler # 3469

posted 22 February 2006 12:04 PM      Profile for Mr. Magoo   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Cool. Mind you, the parents in favour of inviting Jesus into the classroom will regard this as the fault of the Godless Heathens, but hopefully the normals will realize it's just the cost of keeping Church and State separate, and if blame must be laid, lay it at the feet of the Jesus-freaks for trying to fuck up that separation in the first place.

Maybe they need a clever ad campaign. Something like "If you want to force your kids' school to teach them about God, it won't work, and the entire school will end up having to share one pencil, and they won't be able to afford a sports team. Why not just take them to church??"


From: ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø, | Registered: Dec 2002  |  IP: Logged
Tommy Shanks
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3076

posted 22 February 2006 12:30 PM      Profile for Tommy Shanks     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I'm waiting for Pat Robertson to spout off about this again.

Edit:

And Magoo: Jesus Freaks? Come on. No need to slander the God botherers.

[ 22 February 2006: Message edited by: Tommy Shanks ]


From: Toronto | Registered: Sep 2002  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca