babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » right brain babble   » humanities & science   » The rehabilitation of Judas

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: The rehabilitation of Judas
Doug
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 44

posted 16 January 2006 05:29 AM      Profile for Doug   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
The Times of London reported last week on a high-level scheme afoot to rehabilitate Judas, traditionally reviled as the traitor — a mole at the Last Supper — who finked out Jesus, fingering him for Roman soldiers.

One Monsignor Walter Brandmuller, head of the Pontifical Committee for Historical Science, appears to be spearheading the campaign, with the rumoured support of prominent Catholic scholars close to both Pope Benedict XVI and the late John Paul II.

This comes as the Church braces itself for the publication of a "forbidden" Gospel of Judas by both National Geographic magazine and a Swiss foundation specializing in the culture of antiquity.


http://tinyurl.com/93dnr


quote:
This was a stitch-up, jurors; Judas was a scapegoat, an innocent victim of religious persecution, racial prejudice, political animus, wilful mistranslation and mistaken identity. So far from being the traitor of myth, my client was a man who simply did what was asked of him. The charges against him are hearsay: circumstantial, illogical and frankly unbelievable.

For 1,967 years, Judas Iscariot has stood convicted of the most heinous crimes: betrayal of the Son of God, an accessory to state murder without trial and accepting blood money. My client cannot defend himself in person because he is currently serving a sentence of eternal damnation in the seventh circle of hell, having his head gnawed off by a three-headed monster.


Framed, he says, framed!

I'm especially interested in what this so-called Gospel of Judas has to say, though who knows if there's any accuracy to it.


From: Toronto, Canada | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 16 January 2006 08:15 AM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Oooh! This sounds toothsome!

I've often thought Judas got a bit of a raw deal. I mean, he was simply a tool of prophecy if you believe the supernatural aspects of the story. How could he do differently than God ordained? If he hadn't played his part (and during the Last Supper, Jesus TELLS him to do so), then the prophecy would not have been fulfilled. And how could those who believe that God is omniscient and omnipotent think that Judas could have gone a way other than where God had foreordained as his purpose?


From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Reality. Bites.
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6718

posted 16 January 2006 08:28 AM      Profile for Reality. Bites.        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Michelle:
I've often thought Judas got a bit of a raw deal.

Avenge Sodom!

Talk about a raw deal.


From: Gone for good | Registered: Aug 2004  |  IP: Logged
aka Mycroft
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6640

posted 16 January 2006 10:16 AM      Profile for aka Mycroft     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Didn't Morley Callaghan write a book arguing that Judas was actually Jesus' most faithful disciple because a) if Jesus was omniscient then he knew Judas was the one who would betray him b) he needed to be turned over to the Romans in order to fulfill his destiny c) Judas was designated with the job not because he was dishonest and deceitful but because he was the one Jesus most trusted to fulfill his wishes regardless of his (Judas') personal misgivings.
From: Toronto | Registered: Aug 2004  |  IP: Logged
anne cameron
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8045

posted 16 January 2006 10:19 AM      Profile for anne cameron     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
A poster wonders if the Gospel of Judas will have any accuracy in it.

Do any of the others?

How come we don't revile the guy who denied Christ three times?

If Christ hadn't been crucified...what? People would be declaring war in the name of WHO? Sam? Tom?

And how accurate is the story of Lot's wife, who became a pillar of salt?

The entire Bible is very suspect when it comes to accuracy. I've never had much faith in the loaves and fishes story, or in the changing water into wine...although it does kinda sorta explain why Paul told Timothy "take a little wine for the sake of thy stomach" when Tim pointed out that they were supposed to avoid "the fruit of the vine"...

Then there's David and Bathsheba... which one of them knew the other went up onto the roof every evening? Did he take a sudden interest in sunsets or did she take her bath up there knowing the King would see her alabaster beauty?

Judas did his part. Jesus told him to do his part. If he hadn't people might be saying I believe in God the Father Almighty, maker of Heaven and Earth and in Elmer, His only Son, Our Lord...

and how in the name of Christ would we ever swear? Holy Elmer hardly does it, now, does it?


From: tahsis, british columbia | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged
Mr. Magoo
guilty-pleasure
Babbler # 3469

posted 16 January 2006 10:33 AM      Profile for Mr. Magoo   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
he was simply a tool of prophecy if you believe the supernatural aspects of the story. How could he do differently than God ordained? If he hadn't played his part (and during the Last Supper, Jesus TELLS him to do so), then the prophecy would not have been fulfilled

So it was all a big setup? Was Karl Rove involved somehow?


From: ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø, | Registered: Dec 2002  |  IP: Logged
Andrew_Jay
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 10408

posted 16 January 2006 11:22 AM      Profile for Andrew_Jay        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Doug:
My client cannot defend himself in person because he is currently serving a sentence of eternal damnation in the seventh circle of hell, having his head gnawed off by a three-headed monster.
I also think his co-prisoners, Brutus and Cassius who are occuping the beasts other two heads, are also getting treated pretty unfairly - what they did wasn't that bad.

From: Extremism is easy. You go right and meet those coming around from the far left | Registered: Sep 2005  |  IP: Logged
Khimia
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11641

posted 16 January 2006 02:14 PM      Profile for Khimia     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Evidently the Times could use a few Fact checkers rorate-caeli.blogspot.com.
From: Burlington | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged
Mr. Magoo
guilty-pleasure
Babbler # 3469

posted 16 January 2006 02:35 PM      Profile for Mr. Magoo   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
That could have been fun.

Fact-checker: 'Uh, we've looked at the Bible as requested, and found a total of 31,485 factual errors, such as "6000 year old earth", "Man lives to 900", "Woman turned to salt", "Boat contains 2 of every animal" and 31,481 more...'

Thanks so much for the Catholic link though.


From: ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø, | Registered: Dec 2002  |  IP: Logged
aka Mycroft
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6640

posted 16 January 2006 03:29 PM      Profile for aka Mycroft     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Biblical Errancy
From: Toronto | Registered: Aug 2004  |  IP: Logged
Khimia
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11641

posted 16 January 2006 03:53 PM      Profile for Khimia     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Thanks so much for the Catholic link though.

Ahh you say that as if it were a bad thing.


From: Burlington | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged
Paul Gross
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3576

posted 16 January 2006 04:04 PM      Profile for Paul Gross   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Decades ago, Leon Rosselson presented a somewhat different take in his song "Stand up for Judas"

quote:
The Romans were the masters when Jesus walked the land
In Judea and in Galilee they ruled with an iron hand
And the poor were sick with hunger and the rich were clothed in splendour
And the rebels whipped and crucified hung rotting as a warning
And Jesus knew the answer
Said, "Give to Caesar what is Caesar's", said, "Love your enemies"
But Judas was a Zealot and he wanted to be free
"Resist", he said, "The Romans' tyranny"
...
Now Jesus brought division where none had been before
Not the slaves against their masters but the poor against the poor
Set son to rise up against father, and brother to fight against brother
For he that is not with me is against me, was his teaching
Said Jesus, "I am the answer"
"You unbelievers shall burn forever, shall die in your sins"
"Not sheep and goats", said Judas, "But together we may dare
Shake off the chains of misery we share"

Jesus stood upon the mountain with a distance in his eyes
"I am the way, the life", he cried, "The light that never dies"
So renounce all earthly treasures and pray to your heavenly father
And he pacified the hopeless with the hope of life eternal
Said Jesus, "I am the answer"
And you who hunger, only remember your reward's in Heaven
So Jesus preached the other world but Judas wanted this
And he betrayed his master with a kiss

By sword and gun and crucifix Christ's gospel has been spread
And 2.000 cruel years have shown the way that Jesus led
The heretics burned and tortured, and the butchering, bloody crusaders
The bombs and rockets sanctified that rain down death from heaven
They followed Jesus, they knew the answer
All non-believers must be believers or else be broken
So put no trust in Saviours, Judas said, For everyone
Must be to his or her own self - a sun


The full lyrics (I omitted one verse and the chorus to avoid posting the entire song) and a brief discussion are here:
http://mysongbook.de/msb/songs/s/standupf.html


From: central Centretown in central Canada | Registered: Jan 2003  |  IP: Logged
Red Albertan
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9195

posted 16 January 2006 11:22 PM      Profile for Red Albertan        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Michelle:
Oooh! This sounds toothsome!

I've often thought Judas got a bit of a raw deal. I mean, he was simply a tool of prophecy if you believe the supernatural aspects of the story. How could he do differently than God ordained? If he hadn't played his part (and during the Last Supper, Jesus TELLS him to do so), then the prophecy would not have been fulfilled. And how could those who believe that God is omniscient and omnipotent think that Judas could have gone a way other than where God had foreordained as his purpose?


I have a problem with the whole story. Imagine... someone doing extraordinary things that are not humanly possible for three and a half years... drawing thousands of people... feeding the masses with next to nothing yet never running out... healing the incurable... why the need to have someone point him out. Even without media, everyone in Jerusalem or anywhere he allegedly travelled would have known him by face... especially the Pharisees and the Authorities. To say that they needed a traitor who would expose him is kind of funny in that context, no?


From: the world is my church, to do good is my religion | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged
ceti
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7851

posted 17 January 2006 12:28 AM      Profile for ceti     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Nikos Kazantzakis (Last Temptation of Christ) had the same take of Judas, as he was the most devoted disciple and the only one that Jesus could trust to betray, and thus fulfill his mission. As Martin Scorsese depicted, the other disciples seemed like the seven dwarves (Peter got the worst of it) next to Judas/Harvey Keitel who was a strong-willed zealot not above killing for the cause of freedom.

So yeah, I feel Judas got a raw deal. He had to do what he had to do, which was the worst job in the whole world!

[ 17 January 2006: Message edited by: ceti ]


From: various musings before the revolution | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged
Rufus Polson
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3308

posted 18 January 2006 03:41 AM      Profile for Rufus Polson     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
The Romans were the masters when Jesus walked the land
In Judea and in Galilee they ruled with an iron hand

quote:

Reg:

All right, but apart from the sanitation, the medicine, education, wine, public order, irrigation, roads, a fresh water system, and public health, what have the Romans ever done for us?



From: Caithnard College | Registered: Nov 2002  |  IP: Logged
stupendousgirlie
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11076

posted 18 January 2006 08:19 AM      Profile for stupendousgirlie     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Judas Priest is a good band.
From: Wondering how the left can ever form a national government | Registered: Nov 2005  |  IP: Logged
FabFabian
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7496

posted 21 January 2006 04:08 AM      Profile for FabFabian        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
What I got from Judas was that it's not the people who oppose you who will cause your demise, rather those who are closest to you. You always hurt the ones you love.

Still think he was a grass.


From: Toronto | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged
'lance
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1064

posted 21 January 2006 01:48 PM      Profile for 'lance     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Michelle:
Oooh! This sounds toothsome!

I have nothing intelligent -- or even inane -- to add on the subject of Judas, but I like the word "toothsome," and think it should be rehabilitated, or anyway used more often.


From: that enchanted place on the top of the Forest | Registered: Jul 2001  |  IP: Logged
jonomab
recent-rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11845

posted 22 January 2006 01:12 PM      Profile for jonomab     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
i agree that Judas got the bad end of the stick, he was one of the churches main boogeymen. if they remove this character who will they replace him with?

another thing what interests me, is why did they never release this "Gospel of Judas" before, are they releasing it now that they think it is safe?? or do they fear that people are moving away from the church and they need something fresh, to add a twist??

i personally believe that the bible and all the stories involved are just that, stories. but someone had to write them and people believe them in varying degrees whether they be true or not.


From: London | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged
Red Albertan
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9195

posted 22 January 2006 01:51 PM      Profile for Red Albertan        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
When would Judas Iscariot have written this 'Gospel', since 'legend' [i.e. the Bible] has it that he hanged himself shortly after the betrayal? I am starting to wonder if there is a confusion betwen him and 'Judas, the brother of Jesus'.
From: the world is my church, to do good is my religion | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged
Brett Mann
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6441

posted 24 January 2006 11:59 AM      Profile for Brett Mann        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
It's real easy to poke fun at the Bible and point out contradictions and inconsistencies. What's more difficult is imagining the story of Jesus and Judas as allegorically and factually true, and more, necessary and utterly in keeping with our human condition. The story of Jesus would not resonate with us 2000 years later if it did not connect deeply with a certain knowledge planted in all human hearts. We can ignore and lose this knowledge, or nurture and grow it. What is this knowledge? Different for each person perhaps, but it will involve a sense of the divine in the universe, a sense that we can tune in or tune out this sense of the divine by our actions and thoughts; and that good and evil are real, and have real consequences. Or even this - we humans are borne with and carry all our lives a nostalgia and yearning for a place we have never been. Hunter S. Thompson said it best perhaps - "all my life my heart has yearned for something and I don't know what it is." This spiritual emptiness and need may be our greatest and only proof of God's existence. And there's really no point in speculating about Jesus unless one first believes that God is real.
From: Prince Edward County ON | Registered: Jul 2004  |  IP: Logged
jonomab
recent-rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11845

posted 24 January 2006 02:41 PM      Profile for jonomab     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
@ looney

i would like you to post your views in the "Dawkins: Is religion the root of all evil?" thread on how u feel about the matter and express your belief in this inate "certain knowledge" it is more apropriate for the statements u have made.

this inate felling u refer to is the psychological urge to be part of a group. deeply seeded in survival, groups get more food, make bigger kills, are we are safer in larger numbers etc...

the fact that this "gospel of judas" exists is suspicious, in the early stages of christianity the main church gave the order to destroy certain "volumes" of the bible, in a sense "editing" it to keep and remove the views and interests of the current church as it were.

here is an article with a few facts on it, its not poking fun at the the bible but showing clear facts about its discrepancies.

i dont mean to be seen as attacking u in any way, but saying that people have inate beliefs built into them is a dangerous statement. that can lead to people saying they are not responsible for their actions due to their "genetic programing".[][]

[ 24 January 2006: Message edited by: jonomab ]


From: London | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged
Boarsbreath
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9831

posted 31 January 2006 10:04 PM      Profile for Boarsbreath   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Katzanzakis...shoulda recalled. I was thinking Jesus Christ Superstar, it's all clear there, indeed Judas is the dramatic focus really.

And it's a heck of a lot better, as an album, than either Scorcese's movie or (dare I suggest it) Judas Priest. (Though the latter has to be among the top few names for bands.)


From: South Seas, ex Montreal | Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged
Boom Boom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7791

posted 31 January 2006 10:27 PM      Profile for Boom Boom     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I have a shelf of Kazanzakis' books, including two Jesus books, and Zorba. About time I read them, again.
From: Make the rich pay! | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca