babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » right brain babble   » humanities & science   » If there was another world superpower...

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: If there was another world superpower...
RookieActivist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4089

posted 29 May 2003 05:18 PM      Profile for RookieActivist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
If the Cold War was continuing, and the USSR was just as powerful as the United States, how do you think it would change US foreign policy?

Do you think leaders like George Bush would be as aggressive in their foreign affairs, or would he be much more cautious?


From: me to you | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
paxamillion
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2836

posted 29 May 2003 05:23 PM      Profile for paxamillion   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Aren't we all supposed to be part of some sort of "Second Superpower?"
From: the process of recovery | Registered: Jul 2002  |  IP: Logged
clockwork
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 690

posted 29 May 2003 05:35 PM      Profile for clockwork     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
What, public opinion?
From: Pokaroo! | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
tyoung
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3885

posted 29 May 2003 05:39 PM      Profile for tyoung        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
But now there are two superpowers: the US and the merging voice of the people of the world.

Robert Muller

quote:
In this unprecedented public conversation, the world is asking: "Is war legitimate? Is it illegitimate? Is there enough evidence to warrant an attack? Is there not enough evidence to warrant killing masses of human brothers and sisters? "What will be the consequences? The costs? What will happen after a war? Will this set off other conflicts? What might be peaceful alternatives? "What kind of negotiations are we not thinking of? What are the real intentions for declaring war?"

Unfortunately, now that the war is "over", this conversation seems to have stopped, or become barely audible.


From: Vancouver Island | Registered: Mar 2003  |  IP: Logged
RookieActivist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4089

posted 29 May 2003 07:03 PM      Profile for RookieActivist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The rest of the world simply doesn't have the capability to seriously oppose US international policy. To do so, they need a collective voice; but the UN was ignored and does not have the power necessary to enforce its regulations. Even the countries that have the military power to oppose the US are unwilling to do so, primarily due to the overwhelming economic control the States has on the rest of the world.
From: me to you | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
DrConway
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 490

posted 29 May 2003 08:34 PM      Profile for DrConway     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
In some ways we'd be better off, in some ways worse off, if the USSR were still around, and still predominantly Communist.

We'd be worse off due to the continuing subtle McCarthyism that permeated Canada and the USA as late as the 1980s: "Aren't you being a little soft on Communism?" is the sneer that terrified many a politician.

As well, the bipolar-world model means that one of its worst defects, the willingness to ignore human rights abuses by one side's SOBs meant that non-industrial nations would continue to be destabilized by the US or the USSR without serious dissenting opinion being a factor - witness the differences between casual acceptance of the CIA's assistance in getting Allende knocked off versus many people today questioning the US's unseemly interference in Venezuela's internal affairs.

We'd be better off in the sense that the military-capital complex would be forced to continue the Keynesian Compact if only to keep workers from being attracted to the fact that an alternative to capitalism was functional and operative. (The reverse is also true, incidentally; the existence of the USA and its allies was a beacon to Russians who wanted reforms and an end to the stifling hand of bureaucratic interference in domestic affairs)

I think on balance we'd be frozen in the mid-1970s.


From: You shall not side with the great against the powerless. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca