babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » walking the talk   » youth issues   » Ontario NDP wants ban on food ads for kids

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Ontario NDP wants ban on food ads for kids
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323

posted 06 April 2008 08:56 AM      Profile for unionist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Do children qualify as "youth"? Anyway, I'm putting it in this forum:

G&M

quote:
Ontario is facing a “serious problem” with overweight children and must do more to protect them by banning advertising directed at kids, NDP critic Rosario Marchese said.

He plans to introduce a bill Monday amending the Consumer Protection Act to prohibit commercial television advertising for food or drink that is directed at a child under the age of 13.

“We believe that marketers know when marketing works and it does affect dietary choices that children make,” he said.


Dumb question:

Why not ban ALL advertising aimed at kids under 13??

[ 06 April 2008: Message edited by: unionist ]


From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 06 April 2008 09:13 AM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I would LOVE that. Doesn't Quebec have such a law?

The "food" ads are the worst, though.


From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Polly Brandybuck
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7732

posted 06 April 2008 11:41 AM      Profile for Polly Brandybuck     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
And label the foods that are dangerous as dangerous. Warning, may contain...... This product has no nutrient value and will lead to obesity and a host of other health problems including heart disease, diabetes, etc.

Sort of like cigarettes.


From: To Infinity...and beyond! | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323

posted 06 April 2008 12:12 PM      Profile for unionist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Michelle:
Doesn't Quebec have such a law?

Yes it does - an explanation is here.


From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
Mercy
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13853

posted 06 April 2008 05:06 PM      Profile for Mercy     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Good for Marchese and the NDP.

You gotta start somewhere I suppose and the media hype about "Are your kids fat?" makes this a good place to start.


From: Ontario, Canada | Registered: Feb 2007  |  IP: Logged
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323

posted 06 April 2008 07:40 PM      Profile for unionist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Mercy:
Good for Marchese and the NDP.

You gotta start somewhere I suppose and the media hype about "Are your kids fat?" makes this a good place to start.


I agree you "gotta start somewhere", but are you aware that Québec banned all advertising directed at children almost thirty years ago?

And that advertisers spent the next ten years in court until the Supreme Court of Canada finally upheld the ban in 1989?

Is there some reason why the same couldn't be done in Ontario??


From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 06 April 2008 08:07 PM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by unionist:
Is there some reason why the same couldn't be done in Ontario??

Right now we have a phony-majority Liberal dictatorship. They have 22% of the eligible vote propping them up with over 60% of the seats in Toronto legislature and good for 100% of the power. They can tell Rosario and the NDP to go to hell at every turn and most likely will for another four long years. Last one out of Ontario should turn off the lights until the newklear power bills come rolling in. Got any cheap electricity in la belle province that isn't being siphoned off to the States, unionist?


From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
Lord Palmerston
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4901

posted 07 April 2008 02:10 PM      Profile for Lord Palmerston     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by unionist:
Why not ban ALL advertising aimed at kids under 13??

I believe they have done so in Sweden.


From: Toronto | Registered: Jan 2004  |  IP: Logged
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323

posted 07 April 2008 02:30 PM      Profile for unionist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Fidel:

Right now we have a phony-majority Liberal dictatorship.


Ok, Fidel. When the NDP forms the government - with a true majority - do you think they should ban advertising to children, as the PQ did thirty years ago - or would that still be too risky?


From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 07 April 2008 03:28 PM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by unionist:

Ok, Fidel. When the NDP forms the government - with a true majority - do you think they should ban advertising to children, as the PQ did thirty years ago - or would that still be too risky?


Yes, a bagel with cream cheese would be better for them than a High Ball "energy" drink or whatever it is their selling.

And we should ban pharmaceutical advertising.

And I'm appalled over the feds sending out adverts in the mail for kids to join the military. The same enticements are listed on army posters plastered all over our malls where unemployed young Canadians frequent. They list "Over 100 full and part-time job opportunities", Professional fields and technical trades, and most glaringly, Financial aid for your studies. If socialism is good enough for our colonial administrators in Ottawa and our "Yes-yes! aye-aye Uncle Sam" stoogeocrats, then it should be good enough for all Canadians at the same time. I am definitely not a proud Canadian on this day.


From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
Mercy
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13853

posted 07 April 2008 04:49 PM      Profile for Mercy     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I agree unionist - complete ban. That noted, look at the backlash against Marchese's bill.
quote:
A proposal to ban all television advertising of food and drinks to children under 13 in Ontario is unrealistic in the Internet age and governments should instead concentrate on better educating both parents and children about commercials, advertisers and media observers said Monday.

Quebec has had a similar, and more far reaching, ban on all advertising aimed at children for 25 years but studies suggest the impact is reduced in homes that have cable television bringing in media from other provinces and countries.

The proposed private member's bill in Ontario, introduced Monday, would be even less effective in today's wired world and children need to be taught to be more media savvy, said Jane Tallim, co-executive director of the Ottawa-based Media Awareness Network.

"TV tends to be quite a passive medium. The child watches an engaging commercial and it might encourage them to ask for a particular product," Tallim said in an interview.

"But on the Internet, you have marketers building whole environments that kids become immersed in and that's much more powerful in building brand identity and brand loyalty."

The Media Awareness Network has a game on its website that helps children learn about advertising and how companies target them, and Tallim said that's a more effective approach than trying to implement a ban that just wouldn't work.

The Concerned Children's Advertisers - which represents 16 major food and beverage companies including General Mills, Kellogg's, Kraft, Coca Cola and Pepsico - said Monday that the ban on advertising directed at children in Quebec has not lowered child obesity rates.

The children's advertisers have adopted a new code in which some members will stop making commercials aimed at children under 12, cartoon characters will no longer be used to promote fast foods, and companies will use ads to promote healthier food choices and a more active lifestyle.

"I think that's where advertising can play such a powerful role in promoting healthy active living messages and hopefully helping to shift societal norm for kids," said executive director Diana Carradine.


At least the CP reporter had the integrity to mention that Concerned Children's Advertisers is a front group for the junk-food industry but she (or he) reported, straight-up, that the so-called Media Awarness Network opposed the bill - without mentioning that it's a who's who of media conglomerates. This board of directors is like a broadcast industry rolodex.

MNet's programs are funded by its public and private sector sponsors, donors and partners, who include: Bell Canada - CTVglobemedia - TELUS - Microsoft Canad

Insane.


From: Ontario, Canada | Registered: Feb 2007  |  IP: Logged
Scott Piatkowski
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1299

posted 07 April 2008 05:03 PM      Profile for Scott Piatkowski   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Quebec has had a similar, and more far reaching, ban on all advertising aimed at children for 25 years but studies suggest the impact is reduced in homes that have cable television bringing in media from other provinces and countries.

Kind of makes the case for extending the ban to other provinces and countries, doesn't it?


From: Kitchener-Waterloo | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
miles
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7209

posted 07 April 2008 05:10 PM      Profile for miles     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
How would this work? Would Rogers be "forced" to block any and all commercials regardless of the location of the station they are on?

For example if you have digital you can get cbc vancouver to cbc newfoundland. So if the ad ran on cbc vancouver would rogers toronto have to ban it from playing in ontario?


From: vaughan | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323

posted 07 April 2008 05:52 PM      Profile for unionist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by miles:
How would this work? Would Rogers be "forced" to block any and all commercials regardless of the location of the station they are on?

I would hope so. If the U.S. makes child porn legal, I would imagine Rogers would be shut down in two seconds flat if it broadcast that here. I do believe where there's a will, there's a way - if you pass a law, enforce it.


From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 07 April 2008 06:11 PM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Canadian cable stations already somehow find a way to broadcast Canadian commercials over American feeds. I'm sure they can find a way to block advertising aimed at children.
From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Dr. Hilarius
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 15081

posted 09 April 2008 08:39 AM      Profile for Dr. Hilarius     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Does anyone know if this covers ALL food ads aimed at children or only junk food ads? I.e. will ads for milk or apple juice aimed at kids also be subjected to the ban?
From: Hamilton | Registered: Mar 2008  |  IP: Logged
Proaxiom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6188

posted 09 April 2008 08:49 AM      Profile for Proaxiom     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Are American stations available in Quebec? How do they restrict those commercials?
From: East of the Sun, West of the Moon | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
lagatta
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2534

posted 09 April 2008 09:10 AM      Profile for lagatta     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The Québec law bans ALL advertising targeting children, so that would also include milk and juice ads.

But aren't most ads for milk and real juice directed to the general public?

There are many ways to promote healthier eating among children, for example in schools and CPEs (public daycare centre network).

Do remember that cow's milk is NOT healthy for all children, and too much juice (as opposed to whole fruits) can be a problem.

I remember when I was little, long ago, there was a whole ideology centred on cow's milk, promotions of it in schools etc. One nasty teacher thought I was just being difficult when I told her I was allergic to milk. (I flushed bright red and got horrible cramps - fortunately not the very, very serious respiratory problems allergies can cause)...

Schools back then were very intolerant of any kid with an allergy, slight handicap etc.


From: Se non ora, quando? | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged
Proaxiom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6188

posted 09 April 2008 09:21 AM      Profile for Proaxiom     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I don't see milk ads targeted at kids, but lots of juice ads.

Too much juice is bad. Same is true of water, though. That can kill you.

Do Quebec broadcasters have to screen commercials on American stations?


From: East of the Sun, West of the Moon | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
Dr. Hilarius
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 15081

posted 09 April 2008 11:59 AM      Profile for Dr. Hilarius     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Yeah, too much of anything is bad for you but if you're going to run food/beverage ads at kids, it's much better that it be juice or water than Coke or Pepsi. Does anyone know what sort of criteria they use to determine whether an ad is "targetted at kids"? It can be somewhat subjective.

[ 09 April 2008: Message edited by: Dr. Hilarius ]


From: Hamilton | Registered: Mar 2008  |  IP: Logged
kropotkin1951
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2732

posted 09 April 2008 12:14 PM      Profile for kropotkin1951   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I can tell you that one specific ad I see a lot (especially on APTN) is for Sunny D. This is sugar water and because they add Vitamins they advertise themselves "as the good drink kids go for." That ad might make it onto Quebec television because it is pitching to parents not children. It is still deliberately misleading and aimed at getting our young people to consume products that are every bit as dangerous to their health as smoking.

I think that advertising is at the root of our planets problems but that is another debate. Go figure we have been inundated with consume consume consume and lo and behold mother earth is almost consumed.


From: North of Manifest Destiny | Registered: Jun 2002  |  IP: Logged
RosaL
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13921

posted 09 April 2008 12:17 PM      Profile for RosaL     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by kropotkin1951:
I can tell you that one specific ad I see a lot (especially on APTN) is for Sunny D. This is sugar water and because they add Vitamins they advertise themselves "as the good drink kids go for."

Might as well wash a vitamin pill down with a coke


From: the underclass | Registered: Mar 2007  |  IP: Logged
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323

posted 09 April 2008 12:32 PM      Profile for unionist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
There's lots of detailed info on this page for how the Québec law reads and guidelines on how it is to be applied.
From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
Proaxiom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6188

posted 09 April 2008 12:34 PM      Profile for Proaxiom     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The distinction between 'targeted at kids' and 'targeted at parents' may simply be where the ad occurs. If you are banning ads for kids, then the simplest way to do it is to prohibit commercials during television shows whose main viewer demographic is under 12.

Is this how Quebec does it?

Most of the TV my kids watch is Treehouse TV, which doesn't air commercials (except plugs for other shows that are also on Treehouse).


From: East of the Sun, West of the Moon | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323

posted 09 April 2008 12:36 PM      Profile for unionist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Proaxiom:
Is this how Quebec does it?

We cross-posted. Read my link above.


From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
Proaxiom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6188

posted 09 April 2008 12:40 PM      Profile for Proaxiom     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Yes, thanks.

So the show it appears in is a factor in whether an ad is permissible, as are some design characteristics of the ad, and the time it airs.

As far as I can see, it doesn't mention what happens with US broadcasts, though.

For some reason magazine advertising is exempt.


From: East of the Sun, West of the Moon | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323

posted 09 April 2008 12:48 PM      Profile for unionist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Proaxiom:
For some reason magazine advertising is exempt.

Well, not quite. The magazine can't appear more than once every three months, and even then there's all the criteria in secion 91 that have to be met.

I guess they figure 3 months is enough time for the parents to say "no".


From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
Dr. Hilarius
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 15081

posted 09 April 2008 12:57 PM      Profile for Dr. Hilarius     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Does anyone know if this would include ads that feature athletes, etc.? i.e. the ads that lebron James does for Sprite could be considered "directed at kids" since many kids look up Lebron James.
From: Hamilton | Registered: Mar 2008  |  IP: Logged
Proaxiom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6188

posted 09 April 2008 01:29 PM      Profile for Proaxiom     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by unionist:

I guess they figure 3 months is enough time for the parents to say "no".

It takes me less than 3 seconds.

Occasionally that will extend to 3 minutes for me to get them to stop their whining about it, using threat of toy confiscation.


From: East of the Sun, West of the Moon | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
cco
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8986

posted 09 April 2008 05:39 PM      Profile for cco     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by unionist:

Why not ban ALL advertising aimed at kids under 13??
[ 06 April 2008: Message edited by: unionist ]

Why not ban ALL advertising -- period? (I am not being sarcastic.) I'd be comfortable preserving the phone book model of advertising -- if I want to /seek out/ ads, fine. Plenty of jurisdictions have banned billboards, and tobacco advertisements, for example, have been banned or heavily restricted without eliminating the industry. I'm tired of the onslaught. If a product is appealing enough to consumers, it won't require an entire industry centered around how best to deceive the public to convince us of that.


From: Montréal | Registered: Apr 2005  |  IP: Logged
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323

posted 09 April 2008 05:49 PM      Profile for unionist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by cco:

Why not ban ALL advertising -- period? (I am not being sarcastic.)


I'd like to ban capitalism, but my question was more aimed at wondering why the Ontario NDP can't simply propose something which has been law next door for 30 years.


From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
Bacchus
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4722

posted 09 April 2008 05:51 PM      Profile for Bacchus     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Might as well wash a vitamin pill down with a coke

Thats what I do


From: n/a | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
Proaxiom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6188

posted 09 April 2008 06:24 PM      Profile for Proaxiom     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I always say there's nothing like a Jos. Louis and a can of Pepsi to start the day off right.
From: East of the Sun, West of the Moon | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
Proaxiom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6188

posted 09 April 2008 06:32 PM      Profile for Proaxiom     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by cco:
Why not ban ALL advertising -- period?

There are some benefits to advertising. It pays for a lot of things we find useful.

One example being most of the content on the Internet. Also, radio. And television programming, excluding specialty channels that you pay for.


From: East of the Sun, West of the Moon | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 10 May 2008 08:54 AM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I have a question - how does Quebec determine whether an ad is aimed at a child or not? I can imagine that there would be a lot of grey area there.
From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323

posted 10 May 2008 09:09 AM      Profile for unionist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
From the statute:

249. To determine whether or not an advertisement is directed at persons under thirteen years of age, account must be taken of the context of its presentation, and in particular of

(a) the nature and intended purpose of the goods advertised;

(b) the manner of presenting such advertisement;

(c) the time and place it is shown.

Some descriptive explanation:

quote:
The Regulation respecting the application of the Consumer Protection Act provides some exceptions. For example, a television advertisement to announce a show directed to children may be broadcast, provided this advertisement is in conformity with certain requirements listed in the regulation.

Under the Consumer Protection Act, the advertising of certain products (toys, candies and foods) and certain services in children’s programs is prohibited unless the TV advertisement is of no interest to children. Restrictions also apply to certain characteristics of advertisements such as:

1.
the use of themes pertaining to fantasy, magic, mystery, suspense and adventure;

2.
the inappropriate use of children, the use of childish voices, heroes, fantastic or eccentric creatures, and the use of animals;

3.
the use of music that is particularly attractive to children.

The Office de la protection du consommateur (OPC), which oversees the implementation of this legislation, has established guidelines addressed to cases in which advertising is addressed to both children and parents. This type of advertising may only be broadcast during programs for which children between the ages of 2 and 11 account for less than 15% of the audience.


Source.

[ 10 May 2008: Message edited by: unionist ]


From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323

posted 10 May 2008 09:17 AM      Profile for unionist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
[Whoops, wrong thread...]
From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 12 May 2008 04:00 AM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
That sounds great. Obviously there is going to be grey area even with that level of detail, and advertisers will try to push the envelope. But if Quebec can do it, I don't see why we can't.

And as you say, I don't see why we can't ban ALL ads aimed at kids. But food is a good start.


From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca