babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » rabble content   » news by the rest of us   » Entrapment by Rogers

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Entrapment by Rogers
ThePB
recent-rabble-rouser
Babbler # 15642

posted 07 November 2008 04:40 AM      Profile for ThePB     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Rogers has a 'quiet' policy of entrapment.

I discovered this by accident. I was late in paying my latest Rogers internet bill, and I'd received a phone call to make me aware of it.

I decided to downgrade my internet speed to cut costs, so after speaking to the billing department, I spoke to a customer service rep about changing my net service down to 'ultra light'

I was told that the option was unavailable to the representative, because the account was in arrears. So I asked her what would happen if I couldn't pay my bill at all - she said the service would still be billed to me, even with it shut off for non-payment, in perpetuity until the bill was paid.

Imagine being forced to pay for potentially months of 'services' that you don't receive, simply because you couldn't pay a previous bill.

Entrapment.

(Sorry this isn't like an 'article', I hope it is useful to folks here though.)


From: ontario | Registered: Oct 2008  |  IP: Logged
Kevin Laddle
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14976

posted 07 November 2008 05:16 AM      Profile for Kevin Laddle     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Rogers (along with Bell and Telus) should have every penny of the considerable amount of corporate welfare they receive cut off, and have their "rights" to the airwaves withdrawn, and the telecomm infrastructure they "own" appropriated. Yesterday wouldn't be soon enough.

[ 07 November 2008: Message edited by: Kevin Laddle ]


From: Planet Earth | Registered: Feb 2008  |  IP: Logged
bigcitygal
Volunteer Moderator
Babbler # 8938

posted 07 November 2008 05:49 AM      Profile for bigcitygal     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Hey ThePB. That's simply idiotic what they've told you.

I like to call this the advanced "drug dealer" school of selling goods/services.

At the front-end it looks like this: Rogers is introducing a bunch of new channels, one is Deja View from the US. Very bad reruns from the 70s and 80s. It's "free", for now. Until one is "hooked" on Cosby and Roseanne, then one has to pay for it.

By the way, we get 1000 channels in my household and there are many times when there is nothing on.


From: It's difficult to work in a group when you're omnipotent - Q | Registered: Apr 2005  |  IP: Logged
Lard Tunderin' Jeezus
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1275

posted 07 November 2008 06:37 AM      Profile for Lard Tunderin' Jeezus   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I have to say that Rogers is the corporation from hell. Never have I ever been as disgusted with my experience as a client than I am as a customer of Rogers cellular. They have screwed up my billing repeatedly, and were unable to rectify the situation - so that at one point, they had raised my credit limit to $1000 so that I would no longer have to worry about being disconnected (as they'd done, twice) due to their errors. Totally incompetent, and 4 out of 5 times, obnoxious and rude to boot - they seem to be able to screen out the sensible, sane and sympathetic in their hiring process.

They do technically have better reception/coverage in Toronto than Bell, my former service provider, but I'd switch back in a split second, given the opportunity. Can you imagine how totally fucked up an organization has to be to make one nostalgic about Bell Canada?

Unfortunately, I'm tied into a 3 year contract with Rogers, and I'm only halfway through serving my sentence.


From: ... | Registered: Aug 2001  |  IP: Logged
bigcitygal
Volunteer Moderator
Babbler # 8938

posted 07 November 2008 07:09 AM      Profile for bigcitygal     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Unfortunately, I'm tied into a 3 year contract with Rogers, and I'm only halfway through serving my sentence.

I'm sorry to hear about that, LTJ. I'm a cellular commitment-phobe myself. That's why I'm with Virgin pay-as-you-go. Reception sucks outside major centers, and the cost per call/text is quite high, but it fits my usage, which is low.

Back to ThePB's problem. I'm pretty sure that what they told you re. your service isn't legal. How could it be? Unless it's in the fine print that nobody ever reads. Document everything, and don't pay anything except what you actually owe them for services received.


From: It's difficult to work in a group when you're omnipotent - Q | Registered: Apr 2005  |  IP: Logged
Tommy_Paine
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 214

posted 07 November 2008 08:09 AM      Profile for Tommy_Paine     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I don't have a cell phone at all, because of all this stuff. And the fact that I'm not a phone person anyway.

But when the country would like to attract high tech business, it doesn't serve us well that we are the lowest consumers in the Western World of high tech gadgets because companies like Rogers act like pirates.

It's gone beyond individual consumer issues, and is a matter of a few tyrannical companies acting against the national interest.


From: The Alley, Behind Montgomery's Tavern | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
Polly Brandybuck
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7732

posted 07 November 2008 08:30 AM      Profile for Polly Brandybuck     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
....Hello, you have reached Rogers Wireless Customer Service. We're sorry, all our representatives are busy at the moment, please stay on the line and someone will be with you shortly. Your business is important to us. Estimated wait time is, 47, minutes...
From: To Infinity...and beyond! | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312

posted 07 November 2008 09:07 AM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Unfortunately, I'm tied into a 3 year contract with Rogers, and I'm only halfway through serving my sentence.

I just canceled my Rogers account with 1.5 years left in the contract. It cost $200. Don't listen to what the operator on the phone tells you. Tell them you want the cancellation department.

From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
N.Beltov
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4140

posted 07 November 2008 09:23 AM      Profile for N.Beltov   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
In a related vein, I recently discontinued my account with a large telephone provider in Manitoba. They charged me for about $40 of service that I did not receive; when they credited it back in the final billing it only came to $30. Apparently, I owe them around $10 for service that I never received. Gangsters never had it so easy.
From: Vancouver Island | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
Noise
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12603

posted 07 November 2008 09:43 AM      Profile for Noise     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
LTJ:
quote:
They have screwed up my billing repeatedly, and were unable to rectify the situation - so that at one point, they had raised my credit limit to $1000 so that I would no longer have to worry about being disconnected (as they'd done, twice) due to their errors. Totally incompetent, and 4 out of 5 times, obnoxious and rude to boot - they seem to be able to screen out the sensible, sane and sympathetic in their hiring process.

In Rogers defence (not that I like defending Rogers), call centers like these have exceedingly high turn over rates. About half of the people you'll talk to are likely fresh from training and not really sure what they're doing. I'd suggest that ThePB probably found one of the many that didn't know what they were doing.


quote:
I'm sorry to hear about that, LTJ. I'm a cellular commitment-phobe myself. That's why I'm with Virgin pay-as-you-go. Reception sucks outside major centers, and the cost per call/text is quite high, but it fits my usage, which is low.

Me too... You can get monthly rates as well, no contract. After Virgin... You'd be better going off with the big 3's cell companies (Fido, Solo, and Kudoo. Cell phone marketers like ending in o's?) over the big 3 themselves.

N.Beltov:

quote:
In a related vein, I recently discontinued my account with a large telephone provider in Manitoba. They charged me for about $40 of service that I did not receive; when they credited it back in the final billing it only came to $30. Apparently, I owe them around $10 for service that I never received. Gangsters never had it so easy.

Telco billing systems are the flakiest POS's around... You should always be checking your bill for charges you're not expecting.


From: Protest is Patriotism | Registered: May 2006  |  IP: Logged
bigcitygal
Volunteer Moderator
Babbler # 8938

posted 07 November 2008 09:43 AM      Profile for bigcitygal     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Polly Brandybuck:
....Hello, you have reached Rogers Wireless Customer Service. We're sorry, all our representatives are busy at the moment, please stay on the line and someone will be with you shortly. Your business is important to us. Estimated wait time is, 47, minutes...

Aaaaauggg!! Flashback!!! Why are you so cruel Polly? Hasn't ThePB suffered enough? Haven't we all?

After my most recent move two years ago, I took the morning off work to wait for Bell for phone jack installation and hook up. We're in a walk-up apartment building that doesn't face the front of the street, but our doorbell is very loud. They were supposed to come by noon. At 12:30 I called them (on my cel) and they LIED and said the installer had come, rang the bell, and nobody answered. I said, um, no, I've been here and the doorbell didn't ring. I asked to reschedule for another day and was told no, the installer could come by later that day. I think you know the rest of the story: nobody ever came, and when I called later was told "you were down for a morning appointment".

Fucking hell fuck. I couldn't leave the apartment to do laundry or groceries, and I missed a full day of work. Grrrrr.

Both Bell and Rogers are fucked. Who's working on the cool progressive phone/cable/internet service provider?


From: It's difficult to work in a group when you're omnipotent - Q | Registered: Apr 2005  |  IP: Logged
Noise
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12603

posted 07 November 2008 10:26 AM      Profile for Noise     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Who's working on the cool progressive phone/cable/internet service provider?

The second something sends you a bill it becomes powerfully uncool

Most providers that would be considered that are really just purchasing space from one of the big 3 and reselling it anyways (remember the 'throttling thread a while ago where Bell started dropping peer to peer connections being created by the smaller Internet Service Providers that were buying space from Bell?). Might change with White Space line of thought, but I'm not sure how that fully works yet.


From: Protest is Patriotism | Registered: May 2006  |  IP: Logged
Tommy_Paine
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 214

posted 07 November 2008 04:15 PM      Profile for Tommy_Paine     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Fucking hell fuck. I couldn't leave the apartment to do laundry or groceries, and I missed a full day of work. Grrrrr.


Hey, send them an invoice, see what happens.

On one level, the anger expressed against the piratical practices of Rogers or Bel seems missplaced, when we look at many of the other past and continuing injustices in this country.

But, on another level, it takes on a symbolism all it's own, and we're right to be pissed off to the max, even if it is over things that in most instances are not the essentials of life or liberty.

Thing is, the lack of consumer protection in this country not only endangers lives it costs lives. And it costs us jobs and is a serious drain on the finances of the nation when we have to clean up the mess.

And it goes beyond lack of consumer protection. Corporations are frequently given a pass on the criminal code, too.

I'd rather we got the torches and pitchforks out over issues like Arar, or Fantino the wire tapper, etc, but if it's over cable bills and cell phones..... hey, as long as we get the toches and pitchforks out, I'm happy.


From: The Alley, Behind Montgomery's Tavern | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
theleftyinvestor
recent-rabble-rouser
Babbler # 15263

posted 07 November 2008 05:22 PM      Profile for theleftyinvestor     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Write to Ellen Roseman at the Toronto Star. She has helped a lot of people through Bell hell. I'll bet she can do it with Rogers too.
From: Vancouver | Registered: Jun 2008  |  IP: Logged
admin
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 15572

posted 08 November 2008 04:02 AM      Profile for admin     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Noise:

Might change with White Space line of thought, but I'm not sure how that fully works yet.


Larry Page in Support of Whitespace?

Just thought I would attach this link above since it helped to insight a continuation on the line of thought.

Maybe your Government will change it's mind as to the money it made by auctioning off the airwaves, to pushing faster on the outcome of connection in rural places.

I will show later on "how all of us can save money" in terms of using this new White Space connection and appropriate software.

Best,

[ 08 November 2008: Message edited by: admin ]


From: the irreducible basic elements as simple and as few as possible | Registered: Sep 2008  |  IP: Logged
Papal Bull
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7050

posted 08 November 2008 06:48 AM      Profile for Papal Bull   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
One time I was billed 500 dollars by Bell. My bill is 40$/mth, plus about 10 dollars in long distance. They tried to tell me a bunch of crap, but in the end they admitted it was a clerical error and that I was sent some other person's bill.

That's good customer service, right there.


From: Vatican's best darned ranch | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312

posted 08 November 2008 06:59 AM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Both Bell and Rogers are fucked. Who's working on the cool progressive phone/cable/internet service provider?

We have a terrible regulatory system in this country. It allows for the creation of what amounts to an oligopoly on wireless services and regulated monopolies for local service and cable and the regulators are firmly up the ass of the telcos. They are a captured agency, in my view.

I would support good market regulation if the infrastructure was considered a public asset and the services were regulated to ensure the best access to services and features for the benefit of the Canadian public and Canadian industry. But its not. The regulatory system serves to protect the telcos from market competition.

I would argue the market needs to be opened to competition as it is in other countries. We can revisit it after the revolution.

One aspect of the current regulation that really pisses me off is the control of hardware. When you switch service providers, you are expected to also switch phones. Your current, perfectly good, and likely expensive phone becomes fodder for the sock drawer and in the meantime a thousand more lives are lost in the Congo over coltane. It is an absolutely repugnant practice.

[ 08 November 2008: Message edited by: Frustrated Mess ]


From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
500_Apples
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12684

posted 08 November 2008 11:03 AM      Profile for 500_Apples   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Canada gets some of the worst treatment from telecommunications providers in the world. Cell phones, cable, everything. We should look into nationalization.
From: Montreal, Quebec | Registered: Jun 2006  |  IP: Logged
Tommy_Paine
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 214

posted 08 November 2008 05:42 PM      Profile for Tommy_Paine     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
In the meantime, I'd be happy with compliance, even with existing laws.

Remember the 15 cents on text messaging? The two companies announced the exact same fee at the exact same time.

Price fixing.


Put the bastards in jail.


From: The Alley, Behind Montgomery's Tavern | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
Lard Tunderin' Jeezus
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1275

posted 09 November 2008 08:14 AM      Profile for Lard Tunderin' Jeezus   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
More reasons to be angry:
quote:
Our 2007 study is a comparison of cell phone prices offered by service providers in different 10 cities across Canada, the U.S. and Europe.

Our conclusions? Heavy users in Canada pay, on average 1.5x more than a customer with similar usage, opting for equivalent plans, in the United States.

Other major findings are as follows:

* A heavy cell phone user (he or she who uses approx. 1,200 minutes a month & certain data services) in Canada pays roughly 56% more than the same user in the United States. Average users pay about 33% more than his American counterpart.
* If you are a light user of cell phone services, what we refer to as a ‘survival user’, you pay 27% less per month than the average American. The news for the light user isn’t all good – that same user would pay 42% less if he or she lived in Stockholm.
* If you are a heavy cell phone user and are searching the continent for the best deal, consider moving to Athens, Georgia – there you can sign up for an unlimited North American calling plan for approximately US$95/month – about half the cost of a Canadian plan which doesn’t include the benefit of unlimited long-distance calls.

Canadian wireless penetration rests at 58%, second last in the OECD. It's a full 20 percentage points behind the United States, the country's main trading partner.

Seaboard believes relatively high cell phone prices in Canada suppress demand for wireless services.



From: ... | Registered: Aug 2001  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca