babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » right brain babble   » humanities & science   » Cavalier Attitude

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Cavalier Attitude
Tommy Shanks
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3076

posted 08 May 2003 05:44 PM      Profile for Tommy Shanks     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
There's always people who vote the strangest ways, considering their attitudes.

But yes, if you had voted Tory I was going to say, them that makes their beds sleeps in it.

Given that you voted NDP (I'm a die-hard NDP voter, myself) I have to wonder at your cavalier attitude towards certain sectors of society.


In another thread, Human Rights, we got diverted to a discussion of crack users, downtown Toronto, etc. etc. This resulted in someone asking who I voted for and this prompted the above post from the good Dr.

Now, this begs the question. Since I did vote NDP, does this now mean I can't critize or be annoyed at crackheads and drunks who harass me, my wife and baby, who pound on our windows at 3 in the morning, who literally shit on the sidewalk in front of us?

Do I have no right to say, hey you know what, this isn't what you should be doing here?

As I said in the other post, I don't call the cops, I choose to live in my area knowing whats going on, and how its gone down hill in the last couple of years. Seen how the homeless shelter around the corner has been highjacked and turned into a drive-through for drug dealers?

But does that mean I'm a cold-hearted son of a bitch beacuse I don't want to have to fight past a stoned, violent person who's decided to smoke up in the entrance of our building with my 6 month old son?

Would you just accept it Dr. and say, well, thats the bed I sleep in. Would anyone here? Or for political reasons would you say, this is the legacy of the Tories and its not the users fault, therefore who are we to judge?

Sometimes I have to wonder at some people (Ronb excepted who at least seems thoughtful about it) who seem to have lots of patience for this type of behaviour (and usually blame it entirely on cutbacks and the like) because they actually haven't seen it up close.

How many of you would deal with an incredibly drunk woman, asking, then demanding change, then trying to hit you. With a crutch. While your carrying a baby.

How many would shrug that off as the bed you make?

You tend, at moments like that, to avoid expressing how sorry you are for her plight and how the Mike Harris should be strung up.


From: Toronto | Registered: Sep 2002  |  IP: Logged
ronb
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2116

posted 08 May 2003 06:12 PM      Profile for ronb     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Tommy, I may have given you the wrong impression. I have tusseled with a whole legion of drunkards and drug addicts, usually on the doorstep, occasionally on the rooftop/patio thing we had going, and I am NOT shy about calling the cops when there's a particularly nasty lunatic threatening folks on the sidewalk or lurking about on our fire escape. I also befriended (acquantanced would be more accurate, if it were a word) a few of the less savoury characters I saw on a daily basis who turned out to be pretty interesting, if messed up, guys. Some were just plain lost, vacant, in need of serious medical care. I can't be sure, but I have a feeling that making the effort to be friendly with the more rational of them (and that would definitely NOT include the Quebecois squeegee brigade that were a persistant hassle) paid off in a wierd sort of Neighbourhood Watch - we were never broken into.

I do not begrudge you your anger. I've been there. I'm still there, occasionally. Hell, I had a motorcycle gang that used to rev their engines under my window for hours on end, and my new neighbourhood appears to have some sort of moronic gang thing going on... I just feel that the rage provoked by the scary shit going down on our streets is more constructively directed at the sick fucks who are deliberately destroying what used to be an incredibly great downtown, and those guys are not, for the most part, the neighbourhood crackheads.


From: gone | Registered: Jan 2002  |  IP: Logged
PitPat
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4062

posted 08 May 2003 08:04 PM      Profile for PitPat     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
But yes, if you had voted Tory I was going to say, them that makes their beds sleeps in it.

I don't know. East Hastings in Vancouver is not a nice place to be, and it hasn't changed much since Campbell came into power. It was pretty miserable when the NDP was in charge too.

I would find it pretty crass to look at the problems in downtown Vancouver in 1999 and write it off as "well, you voted for the NDP, thems that make their beds sleeps in em".


From: Take it from me, I love you! | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
kuba walda
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3134

posted 08 May 2003 08:07 PM      Profile for kuba walda        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The east end has been like that since I was a kid and probably even before that.... So I guess we should blame all those who voted for Wacky and his gang over and over again.
From: the garden | Registered: Sep 2002  |  IP: Logged
DrConway
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 490

posted 08 May 2003 10:49 PM      Profile for DrConway     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by PitPat:
I don't know. East Hastings in Vancouver is not a nice place to be, and it hasn't changed much since Campbell came into power. It was pretty miserable when the NDP was in charge too.

I would find it pretty crass to look at the problems in downtown Vancouver in 1999 and write it off as "well, you voted for the NDP, thems that make their beds sleeps in em".


Well, here's a small difference: The NDP's ideological basis is not cutbacks and downloading everything onto people who can ill afford (in time, energy or money) to take on the new burdens imposed upon them.

What I was getting at with Tommy was admirably said by ronb - that the correct party to blame is the government in office which has, to a large degree, created the problem by rending the fabric of the welfare state.

It's a structural issue that is manifested on an individual level and thus dealt with individually (cop calling, fighting, whatever) instead of structurally.

The thing is, it's easier to act in a reactive mode (call the cops!) than a proactive mode (hey, let's hold the government's feet to the fire now that we've had to call the cops a few times!) because the proactive mode takes more engagement and commitment and in an atomized society it's hard to find mutual support from others experiencing the same problem.

Back to you, PitPat.

It is, however, a fair statement to make that the East Side of Vancouver should have gone after Joy MacPhail, Glen Clark, Ujjal Dosanjh and the other heavyweights that used to represent this area and hollered for some commitment to getting the place spruced up.


From: You shall not side with the great against the powerless. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
PitPat
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4062

posted 09 May 2003 12:02 PM      Profile for PitPat     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Well, here's a small difference: The NDP's ideological basis is not cutbacks and downloading everything onto people who can ill afford (in time, energy or money) to take on the new burdens imposed upon them.


You're right. It is a small difference. I'm not sure that it matters any. But I stand by my original statement. I've read the original thread, and the responses here and I don't see a cavalier attitude towards the problem. Except by those who would see the issues of homelessness and drug addiction and the problems faced by the individuals caught up in them as little more than walking advertisements for your favorite political party. Whatever the solution is, it will involve a lot more than simply casting a ballot for the NDP in the next provincial election.


From: Take it from me, I love you! | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
Mr. Magoo
guilty-pleasure
Babbler # 3469

posted 09 May 2003 12:30 PM      Profile for Mr. Magoo   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
I just feel that the rage provoked by the scary shit going down on our streets is more constructively directed at the sick fucks who are deliberately destroying what used to be an incredibly great downtown, and those guys are not, for the most part, the neighbourhood crackheads.

Huh. Seems to me that all the government can do is make you poor. It's done that to too many people, and this needs to be undone, but I don't think you can lay the blame for someone's choice of behaviour on the fact that a "Common Sense Revolution" cut their benefits.

Lots of people were hit hard by cutbacks, but they aren't all choosing my doorway to smoke crack. That's a choice. So is threatening someone for money, vandalizing local property, and crapping on the sidewalk. Poverty doesn't make you do these things... ask most poor people.


From: ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø, | Registered: Dec 2002  |  IP: Logged
Tommy Shanks
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3076

posted 09 May 2003 12:38 PM      Profile for Tommy Shanks     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
The thing is, it's easier to act in a reactive mode (call the cops!) than a proactive mode (hey, let's hold the government's feet to the fire now that we've had to call the cops a few times!) because the proactive mode takes more engagement and commitment

Well, Dr., there is sometimes time constraints to consider. I don't know if the guy on my fire-escape would have stuck around until Ernie calls an election.


From: Toronto | Registered: Sep 2002  |  IP: Logged
ronb
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2116

posted 09 May 2003 12:50 PM      Profile for ronb     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Lots of people were hit hard by cutbacks, but they aren't all choosing my doorway to smoke crack.

To hear you tell it, it sounds like they are.


From: gone | Registered: Jan 2002  |  IP: Logged
Mr. Magoo
guilty-pleasure
Babbler # 3469

posted 09 May 2003 01:45 PM      Profile for Mr. Magoo   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
That's how it works out Ron. If you're discussing crime, do you constantly stop to point out that most people aren't criminals?

Toronto is a city of millions, with tens of thousands living in poverty, dozens of whom occupy parts of my neighbourhood, and a handful have chosen my doorway to smoke rock. Even that handful is too many, but the dozens and the thousands show that it doesn't need to be so.


From: ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø, | Registered: Dec 2002  |  IP: Logged
ronb
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2116

posted 09 May 2003 01:57 PM      Profile for ronb     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Ok Ebenezer.
From: gone | Registered: Jan 2002  |  IP: Logged
Tommy Shanks
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3076

posted 09 May 2003 02:45 PM      Profile for Tommy Shanks     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Geez Mr. Magoo, you sound like you think that smoking crack and getting shit-faced in the park after pan-handling all day perhaps may be someone's choice. Don't you know there is not a single person who ever chooses to spend their life in search of the next high?

Don't you know that its always someone else's fault. That woman who hangs out in front of the Victoria restaurant? She's a victim of government policy. Which government I don't know. She's been there the whole 10 years my wife has lived there.

[ 09 May 2003: Message edited by: Tommy Shanks ]


From: Toronto | Registered: Sep 2002  |  IP: Logged
Mr. Magoo
guilty-pleasure
Babbler # 3469

posted 09 May 2003 02:46 PM      Profile for Mr. Magoo   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Hehe. "Ebenezer". Ya, I'm the mean old man who won't let them smoke crack and have fun, and when their frisbees land in my yard, I keep them.

From: ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø, | Registered: Dec 2002  |  IP: Logged
sophrosyne
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4070

posted 10 May 2003 04:50 PM      Profile for sophrosyne     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I can only wonder why you choose to continue living in that neigborhood, Tommy Shanks. Surely there's a better environment available for you to move to.

That said, I don't think any of us can really lay 100% of the blame regarding drug addiction, homelessness etc. squarely on the government. I believe the government cutbacks have made it more difficult for those suffering in these situations.

However I'm a big believer in personal responsibility and think it's ludicrous to blame the government 100% for the choices some people have made regarding their lives.

quote:
I'm a die-hard NDP voter, myself

This being a general criticism, and not one specifically aimed at the author.

Personally I'm not fond of partisan politics. I tend to think one is better represented when one dispassionately reviews a political party's agendas and accomplishments, and votes for whomever (regardless of affiliation) appears to be the best candidate.


From: British Columbia | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca