babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » right brain babble   » humanities & science   » US introduces biodiesel incentive

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: US introduces biodiesel incentive
Agent 204
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4668

posted 11 November 2004 11:47 PM      Profile for Agent 204   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Even a stopped clock tells the right time twice a day.
From: home of the Guess Who | Registered: Nov 2003  |  IP: Logged
Cougyr
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3336

posted 11 November 2004 11:53 PM      Profile for Cougyr     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Yes, but I'd rather they tried to find an alternative to burning hydrocarbons. How about totally electric cars, with solar recharging that works even better than the gas/diesel guzzlers. Now, that would be a good goal.
From: over the mountain | Registered: Nov 2002  |  IP: Logged
Agent 204
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4668

posted 12 November 2004 12:13 AM      Profile for Agent 204   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
In the absence of widespread green electricity production, electric cars are just putting the problem somewhere else. Biodiesel has a big advantage over petroleum- sure, burning it still produces CO2, but growing the plants to produce it consumes CO2. Combine that with hybrid cars (maybe with solar panels on the roof so they don't need to burn as much fuel to keep their batteries charged) and you've got a pretty promising solution.

Solar charging, by itself, has got a ways to go before it's feasible. Maybe one day it will work, but it's more likely to succeed if we already have hybrids so the technology can get its foot in the door.


From: home of the Guess Who | Registered: Nov 2003  |  IP: Logged
Willowdale Wizard
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3674

posted 12 November 2004 07:27 AM      Profile for Willowdale Wizard   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
there's some sort of "growing genetically-engineered soya for biodiesel" angle here that bothers me.

[ 12 November 2004: Message edited by: Willowdale Wizard ]


From: england (hometown of toronto) | Registered: Jan 2003  |  IP: Logged
Agent 204
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4668

posted 12 November 2004 09:22 AM      Profile for Agent 204   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
It bothers me, but less than burning fossil fuels does.
From: home of the Guess Who | Registered: Nov 2003  |  IP: Logged
Cougyr
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3336

posted 12 November 2004 12:15 PM      Profile for Cougyr     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Solar/electric has a long way to go, but that's where the R&D should be. It's clean. The only operating pollutant is heat, and not much of that.
From: over the mountain | Registered: Nov 2002  |  IP: Logged
Agent 204
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4668

posted 12 November 2004 12:17 PM      Profile for Agent 204   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
What about the idea of solar/battery/internal combustion 3-way hybrids as a way of easing solar panels into car designs (and further reducing fuel consumption)?
From: home of the Guess Who | Registered: Nov 2003  |  IP: Logged
gula
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6474

posted 12 November 2004 01:15 PM      Profile for gula     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
How about this fuel-cell car. It looks pretty too.

"Though the buzz of the HY-LIGHT as it drives through the streets is gentle, this four-seater turns out to have outstanding power. It accelerates from standstill to 100 km/h in less than twelve seconds – but there’s no roar of exhaust from its rear end. The HY-LIGHT runs on a system of fuel cells, using hydrogen and oxygen to produce electric current. Steam is the one and only exhaust product from this car – no trace of nitrogen oxides, greenhouse gases or aerosol particles"

http://www.fuelcellsworks.com/Supppage1290.html

Just saw the first two Smart cars here yesterday.


From: Montréal | Registered: Jul 2004  |  IP: Logged
Gir Draxon
leftist-rightie and rightist-leftie
Babbler # 3804

posted 12 November 2004 01:53 PM      Profile for Gir Draxon     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Mike Keenan:
What about the idea of solar/battery/internal combustion 3-way hybrids as a way of easing solar panels into car designs (and further reducing fuel consumption)?

No, no. Far too practical. And someone might *gasp* make a profit in the process! Can't have that happening.


From: Arkham Asylum | Registered: Feb 2003  |  IP: Logged
Agent 204
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4668

posted 12 November 2004 02:33 PM      Profile for Agent 204   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by gula:
How about this fuel-cell car. It looks pretty too.


It does. Fuel cells do have some promise, and may be the best solution in the long run, but in the short run there are serious issues. Not in the car itself, but the fuel. The hydrogen economy is a ways off.

Mind you, I think there are some fuel cells that run off natural gas, methanol, or even gasoline, so there's reason to keep an open mind about them. Still, for the short term I'm more bullish about hybrids.


From: home of the Guess Who | Registered: Nov 2003  |  IP: Logged
Rufus Polson
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3308

posted 12 November 2004 05:18 PM      Profile for Rufus Polson     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
In terms of energy source, fuel cells are just a variant on electric. Instead of using electricity to charge batteries, you're using electricity to make hydrogen.
(Aside) Of course, so far we're not, we're making hydrogen out of natural gas, but that can't last. And the process probably has CO2 byproducts. (/Aside)
So the limitation is the same: Unless you have green electricity generation, it's not a real fix. There's a few "clean car" possibilities I've seen. Battery, Fuel cell, Flywheel, Compressed Air. In the short term, I actually like compressed air best; in the longer term, I think flywheels are very cool.
But we need mainly to worry about generation: Solar, wind, tide, geothermal, low-impact hydro, and whatnot.

From: Caithnard College | Registered: Nov 2002  |  IP: Logged
Agent 204
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4668

posted 12 November 2004 05:35 PM      Profile for Agent 204   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
You're right about the electricity to produce hydrogen. That's what I meant by the hydrogen economy being a long way off. Compressed air is a good idea, but it suffers from the same problem- electricity is needed to compress the air. Hence my view that biodiesel hybrid cars are the best short-term solution.

You may be right about flywheels being the best long-term solution as well, though I don't know enough to say.


From: home of the Guess Who | Registered: Nov 2003  |  IP: Logged
The Oatmeal Savage
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4353

posted 12 November 2004 05:46 PM      Profile for The Oatmeal Savage   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Some of the next generation of nuclear power plants could produce hydrogen directly without using electrolysis.
http://pubs.acs.org/cen/coverstory/8237/8237nuclearenergy.html

From: top of the food chain | Registered: Aug 2003  |  IP: Logged
Agent 204
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4668

posted 12 November 2004 05:59 PM      Profile for Agent 204   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Interesting. Still, though, one of the best things about biodiesel is that in can be used in many existing vehicles- including most trucks and buses- without any modification. That's a big point in its favour, to my mind, because it can be introduced seamlessly, so to speak.
From: home of the Guess Who | Registered: Nov 2003  |  IP: Logged
The Oatmeal Savage
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4353

posted 12 November 2004 06:07 PM      Profile for The Oatmeal Savage   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Just off hand I don't think there are any serious modifications, if any, to a standard diesel engine.
From: top of the food chain | Registered: Aug 2003  |  IP: Logged
Agent 204
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4668

posted 12 November 2004 06:08 PM      Profile for Agent 204   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Exactly. I heard a feature on the radio a couple of years ago about a guy who was running his VW Jetta on the stuff, no problem. That's why I like the idea so much.
From: home of the Guess Who | Registered: Nov 2003  |  IP: Logged
gula
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6474

posted 12 November 2004 07:01 PM      Profile for gula     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
They had a pilot project here in Montréal with some city buses running on biodiesel. Of course, I haven't heard anything more about it.

Here is an amusing article on "biodiesel" usage.

Cooking oil fuel in Wales

http://www.mirabilis.ca/archives/000438.html


From: Montréal | Registered: Jul 2004  |  IP: Logged
gula
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6474

posted 12 November 2004 07:10 PM      Profile for gula     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Rufus Polson:
[QB]In terms of energy source, fuel cells are just a variant on electric. Instead of using electricity to charge batteries, you're using electricity to make hydrogen.

According to this article they would use solar cells, but alas, it won't be tomorrow.

"Michelin says Hi-Light is an example of the non-polluting vehicle-it runs on hydrogen produced by electrolysis using solar cells- which might be practical by around 2020."

http://www.detnews.com/2004/autosinsider/0410/21/c05-307899.htm


From: Montréal | Registered: Jul 2004  |  IP: Logged
Agent 204
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4668

posted 12 November 2004 08:46 PM      Profile for Agent 204   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
My take on hydrogen is, basically, this.

I don't know enough about non-electrolytic means of producing hydrogen to know how efficient they are. I've heard of some systems that can separate hydrogen from hydrocarbons and alcohols... producing CO2 as a byproduct. Might be acceptable if it came from biological sources (which is, in effect, recycling CO2). I can't see it yielding enough to sustain the kind of industry envisioned by hydrogen enthusiasts, though.

A successful electrolytic hydrogen industry would be feasible if, and only if, we could find a virtually unlimited source of electricity (fusion and/or orbital solar). Until then, we should look at reducing our energy consumption. This means increased efficiency as well as responsible use.

Maybe we should reclaim the slogan "wise use" from the anti-environmentalists, and apply it to technology.

[ 12 November 2004: Message edited by: Mike Keenan ]


From: home of the Guess Who | Registered: Nov 2003  |  IP: Logged
The Oatmeal Savage
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4353

posted 12 November 2004 09:07 PM      Profile for The Oatmeal Savage   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
http://www.shec-labs.com/process.htm

quote:
SHEC labs is developing a process that uses sunlight and water to produce hydrogen. The process relies on a thermal-catalytic cycle which requires heat as an input. Instead of burning fossil fuels to create the necessary process heat (and generating greenhouse gases in the process), SHEC labs intends to employ the heat of the sun by using mirrors to focus sunlight onto a chemical reactor.

From: top of the food chain | Registered: Aug 2003  |  IP: Logged
Agent 204
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4668

posted 12 November 2004 09:39 PM      Profile for Agent 204   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Thanks for that reminder, Oatmeal. That's one of several promising ideas for solar generation. I found an old thread about similar ideas here.
From: home of the Guess Who | Registered: Nov 2003  |  IP: Logged
VanLuke
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7039

posted 13 November 2004 02:52 PM      Profile for VanLuke     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
There is a small scale biodiesel project at UBC.

" Throughout Fall 2003 and Winter 2004, we have been producing about 100 litres per week with our small-scale processing system. We are currently nearing the completion of a medium sized processing system which will produce an average of between 1000 and 3000 litres of Biodiesel per week. That is enough to potentially fuel the entire UBC Plant Operations diesel fleet. Actual percentage used will depend on our engine testing program."

http://www.eya.ca/biodiesel/

I don't know why sometimes the url button on the bottom doesn't work. Here's the url of a google search re ubc biodiesel via tinyurl then.

http://tinyurl.com/4ktne

[ 13 November 2004: Message edited by: VanLuke ]


From: Vancouver BC | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged
VanLuke
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7039

posted 13 November 2004 03:09 PM      Profile for VanLuke     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
google search re algae hydrogen
http://tinyurl.com/4whbq

I am not a scientist and I don't know how practical this is. However, this way of "producing" was not mentionned above.

An extract from the hit on the top:

"Berkeley scientist says discovery is like 'striking oil'

Researchers have found a metabolic switch in algae that allows the primitive plants to produce hydrogen gas - a discovery that could ultimately result in a vast source of cheap, pollution-free fuel. Hydrogen, which can be used as a clean-burning fuel in cars and power plants, is virtually limitless in availability, because it is part of the water molecule. It is a candidate to become the world's primary fuel in coming decades. But until now, it was obtainable in quantity only through relatively expensive extraction procedures involving the electrolysis of water or processing natural gas.

The breakthrough, by scientists at the University of California at Berkeley and the U.S. Department of Energy, would make possible the commercial production of hydrogen gas by photosynthesis in tanks, ponds or the open ocean. “I guess it's the equivalent of striking oil,” said Tasios Melis, a microbial biology professor at UC Berkeley. “It was enormously exciting. It was unbelievable.” Melis made the discovery with UC Berkeley researcher Liping Zhang and with Michael Seibert, Maria Ghiardi and Marc Forestier of the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, a Department of Energy project in Golden, Colo. The team's findings appear in this month's issue of Plant Physiology, a science journal...."

From the next hit:

"....Melis found he could reprogram photosynthesis and stifle internal oxygen flow by depriving the plant cells of sulfur. Under these conditions, the algae pumped out hydrogen for days at a time - lots of it. "We thought maybe we'd get a little hydrogen," Melis says. "But it came out in bulk amounts." An acre of his pond scum, he calculates, could produce enough H2 to power a car from Sacramento to Seattle - and theoretically much farther...

The algae-hydrogen system generates electricity that costs about 31 cents a kilowatt-hour. Natural gas-fired juice runs a nickel or less. But a solution is in sight. Melis' team recently uncovered the key bottleneck in its green biomachine: Hydrogenase is present in only tiny amounts. By genetically engineering algae that express high levels of the enzyme, the team expects to double hydrogen output."

The genetic engineering may, or may not, be an issue.

http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/10.04/mustread.html?pg=5

From another hit:

"... DIY Algae/Hydrogen Kit was a first time collaboration between Amy Franceschini and Jonathan Meuser. Currently scientists are testing and generating strains of algae to determine which one most efficiently produces hydrogen in a process called "biophotolysis". This is an exciting sector of research, but most of the activity takes place under highly controlled environments in laboratories within universities. Amy was interested in creating a "backyard/DIY" model which would allow people (not only scientists) to produce hydrogen. The notion of people producing their own power is exciting. Researcher, Jonathan Meuser used this opportunity to exhibit a model of "biophotolysis" to test a system in his backyard. His test was a success, in that it produced hydrogen and could demonstrate the process using off the shelf and found supplies...."

http://www.futurefarmers.com/survey/algae.html


From: Vancouver BC | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged
Klingon
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4625

posted 13 November 2004 05:22 PM      Profile for Klingon        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
K'pla! Ok, interesting move. I have read a bit about bio-diesel and efforts to get it going in Canada.

The Canadian Teamsters Union has apparently endorsed the idea and had invited a researcher on the issue from the Mountain equipment Co-op in Vancouver to speak at their convention.

Apparently, bio-diesel conversion is relatively inexpensive because it works basically the same way as fossil fuel diesel.

But I agree with others on this string that we should also be pushing solar battery technology, hydrogen-electrolysis and Ballards to the max. Obviously, this requires greater re-fit costs. But in the long run it pays off both in job creation, fuel costs and a healthier environment (meaning better human health as well).

The problem is this tax break, as usual with the US government, doesn't go to consumers (who are mostly working class). Rather it goes mainly to large corporations that can use it purely as they see fit (with no time table for conversion or manufacture, as the case may be) and can possibly (given the US pollution credit system) just swap these for other break and not pursue it at all.


From: Kronos, but in BC Observing Political Tretchery | Registered: Nov 2003  |  IP: Logged
Agent 204
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4668

posted 14 November 2004 10:04 AM      Profile for Agent 204   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Anyone notice this?
quote:

It was a nice irony, because, as the cooking-oil driver discovered when he was fined £500 and had his car impounded, the government is not amused by cheap alternative fuel. Diesel is relatively pricey because a large chunk of the cost is made up by duty. Cooking oil carries no such tax. But if it is put to use in a petrol tank, duty is due.


Bastards.

From: home of the Guess Who | Registered: Nov 2003  |  IP: Logged
Agent 204
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4668

posted 20 November 2004 11:38 AM      Profile for Agent 204   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Sorry for the double post, but here's a review of a GM prototype for a diesel hybrid based on the EV1 platform. 219 horsepower, 2.9 L/100 km (80 mi/US gal, or 96 mi/Imperial gal), 0 to 100 km/h in 7 s, can travel 65 km on battery power alone, can be plugged in so you don't have to run the engine.

Run that on biodiesel, and add solar panels on the roof so as to require even less engine/mains power to keep it charged, and you've really got something. Too bad it's not on the market.


From: home of the Guess Who | Registered: Nov 2003  |  IP: Logged
MacD
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2511

posted 20 November 2004 11:48 AM      Profile for MacD     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Too bad that GM sees their hybrid diesel as suitable for the Corvette and Firebird. How many people are in the market for a $70,000 substitute penis? If the engine can produce 219 hp, why not put in vehicles that are practical and affordable for more people, like Cavaliers or Montanas?
From: Redmonton, Alberta | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged
Agent 204
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4668

posted 20 November 2004 11:54 AM      Profile for Agent 204   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
My point is not that sporty cars are the best place for this technology, merely that it's practical, and will give the performance that people have come to expect from their cars. If you can get 219 hp out of a car that consumes 2.9 L/100 km, imagine the fuel economy you could get if you're willing to settle for 150 hp or so. And it should run nicely on biodiesel. Doesn't mean GM will be the ones to do it, but somebody will, and it's about bloody time.
From: home of the Guess Who | Registered: Nov 2003  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca