The review itself was pretty standard at the begining. It wasn't 'till the end I had to read it again:

quote:

---

None of this, of course, would have let Blumenthal mount his spirited defense of Clinton, or come away sure of having fought an epic battle between good and evil instead of a tawdry squabble for spoils. The continuing illusion is costly. As America slips further toward a de facto fascism its political class refuses to recognize, The Clinton Wars may someday seem a forgotten skirmish before the storm.

---

quote:

---

Roger Morris, the author, was a member of the National Security Council under presidents Lyndon Johnson and Richard Nixon,

---

[ 04 June 2003: Message edited by: jeff house ]

quote:

---

None of this, of course, would have let Blumenthal mount his spirited defense of Clinton, or come away sure of having fought an epic battle between good and evil instead of a tawdry squabble for spoils. The continuing illusion is costly. As America slips further toward a de facto fascism its political class refuses to recognize, The Clinton Wars may someday seem a forgotten skirmish before the storm.

---

This is an interesting graf. Three sentences, connected (I guess, somehow) in a manner that makes each one a paragraph left unexplained or highly debatable. The illusions are what? Costly to whom? Spoils? And of this ‘de facto fascism’, the ‘storm’ is what? Can good and evil also squabble for spoils and be petty instead of epic? Is this an abstract for a Star Wars movie?

I smell book-buzz. Hell, when I’m in an old-folks home and I see it [Clinton Wars] on the five-cent special table, I’ll probably buy it and even read it. Then I’ll log on to babble and tell you youg’ins how you gots everything wrong about that. Even if you do or don’t. Some things are just too worth looking forward to.

Smell? An insider account of the American political system masturbating to itself should, I suppose, have no buzz whatsoever?

I personally, take Sid more seriously than the band of merry men that claimed he beat his wife or whatever. In fact, I think I'd listen to him over anyone that was in the Republican Party.

Another review:

quote:

---

Clinton's attackers, on the other hand, mostly came from those elements unreconciled to the new toleration. When Bob Barr disparaged Clinton supporters as not being "real Americans," when Tom DeLay said he pushed impeachment to promote a "biblical worldview" that Clinton didn't share, or when Ken Starr touted his own marital fidelity and his daily singing of Christian hymns, they revealed their own alienation from the emerging live-and-let-live consensus. In this context, the Right's more sinister swipes at the Jewish intellectual Blumenthal--not to mention its resolve to press ahead with impeachment in the face of public outcry--becomes more comprehensible. These are the death throes of a retrograde morality.

---