Author
|
Topic: Codex Alimentarius
|
kuri
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4202
|
posted 25 June 2005 06:56 PM
Do any babblers know anything about this?I understand there are a lot of people against it, and I'm not quite sure why. I've only heard plans to protest it, but no information on what it's about. It appears to be an EU based harmonization of food standards, establishing minimum standards for quality and requiring testing of supplements. Codex Alimentarius homepage Canadian Gov't page on it The only negative link I could find was from a "natural health" magazine that is dead set against regulation of vitamins and other supplements as drugs. I have a hard time having problems with this, as I see people draining their wallets buying ridiculous supplements instead of getting their vitamins from fresh fruits and vegetables which would also provide much needed fibre. Finally here's a short article on it from Medical News. I can see some knee-jerk reaction against this because it could be considered "globalization": but globalizing the EU's food standards - if that's indeed what this does - would probably be a huge improvement over, at least, North American food standards. Yey positive integration! Down with negative integration!
From: an employer more progressive than rabble.ca | Registered: Jun 2003
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478
|
posted 26 June 2005 09:07 AM
In other words, we have to be alert on at least two fronts at once: against quackery on the one hand and against the genuine threat that an international mechanism like the Codex could be commandeered by Big Pharma. Those are, both of them, serious problems. Western governments, especially but not only the U.S., are now as heavily indebted to Big Pharma as they are to the arms industries, and the implications are serious, up to and including the way that any illness of yours may be diagnosed in the first place. But I agree with kurichina that most people most of the time get the health benefits they need from real food and a balanced diet, not from supplements, and that our standards for supplements have been lax, their availability outside a system of medical or pharmacological scrutiny sometimes dangerous. What to do, what to do ...
From: gone | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
kuri
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4202
|
posted 13 July 2005 02:42 AM
Noticed this article in The Scotsman today about the EU version of this regulation. I'm still not clear whether the EU regulations are to copied worldwide in the UN's codex or if it will be modified or watered down, but it's probably still useful to know both. quote: The affected products are mostly high-dosage vitamin supplements sold through health food stores rather than everyday tablets available at High Street pharmacies. Antioxidants such as selenium and minerals such as boron which are sold in tablet form will be affected.
So it seems at least that your normal vitamin C or multivitamin tablet won't be effected, although stores like GNC might see their inventory cut back. I still find the idea of a "health food industry" somewhat oxymoronic.
From: an employer more progressive than rabble.ca | Registered: Jun 2003
| IP: Logged
|
|
|