This is a continuation of the discussion that was previously in the "Bowling for Columbine" thread.
I searched Usenet for some articles by gun owners who opposed the NRA's take-no-prisoner's tactics and came up with this article. The author states that the gun industry is better served than hunters when he says:
quote: This bias toward manufacturers owes more to the bottom line than it does to the Second Amendment. Gun makers are well represented on the NRA board and a significant portion of NRA revenue comes from advertisements bought by this industry.
posted 27 November 2002 04:46 PM
That article makes the interesting point that one of the NRA Board of Directors is the publisher of Soldier of Fortune magazine.
I would like to see a complete list, as they do successfully pose as your basic huntin' fellahs, not as gun pushers.
Email this thread to someone!
posted 19 November 2002 03:04 PM
