Author
|
Topic: The homeowners' dream: not so dreamy
|
|
|
Privateer
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3446
|
posted 06 June 2005 12:56 PM
Is giving gifts to new homeowners that common. I mean we had help from family in buying our place but its not like we're getting married. Anyhow this is the line that stood out for me: quote: We spent countless hours convincing ourselves, our friends and our families that buying a home with two bathrooms, numerous bedrooms, a garage and a large yard was the way for the two of us to make our dream a reality.
What is it with people these days? Why do two people need the amount of space you could have raised a large family in a generation or two ago? I've talked about this before; how in Halifax huge houses are being constructed on multi-acre lots even though the typical family size is less than three people. At the same time, others live in cardboard boxes choking on the car exhaust from the multiple-cars these Yuppies own and commute in for hours everyday so they can live in excessive space on the edge of town. That's my rant for the day.
From: Haligonia | Registered: Dec 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Reality. Bites.
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6718
|
posted 06 June 2005 12:59 PM
I think it's commendable of them to be worried about it, but I suspect most of their friends and families would have been just as generous had they made the initial move to condo ownership, rather than spending a year in a house, or if they had moved into a rented house.I think the best way to show their appreciation is by telling them all "Don't worry. We don't need your help for this move."
From: Gone for good | Registered: Aug 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timebandit
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1448
|
posted 06 June 2005 03:35 PM
Our house is approx. 1800 sqft, which gives us a good-sized living space on the main floor, 3 bedrooms on the second (one for each wild gril, and one for us), and an open-plan office on the third floor, where the blond guy and I both work full-time. The office is a little small, and there are some storage issues, but we've managed to find solutions so far. I don't think you will have much trouble with 2300 sqft, Bacchus, unless your line of work means having inventory in your space.We've also added a play space, a woodworking shop (a very compact one) and a laundry/utility/mucking about/food-storage room into the basement, which was mostly unused when we moved in. I don't think there is any space in the house that isn't regularly used. My first house was 980 sqft, a nice two bedroom bungalow. It was manageable with one kid, but the basement office was pretty dismal to work in. Add kid #2, and it was going to be very tight. I know we could have managed, but it would have been a stress. I don't like seeing the suburbs expanding like they are, and I see the wisdom in more high-density housing. Although we do live just off the core of downtown, I still wouldn't want to give up having a yard or the amount of space that we have. I really love my house and garden. edited to add: The couple in auntie's letter sound a lot like the woman we bought this house from -- she lived here alone, save for two really nasty guard dogs (we had to give advance notice to come see the house so we could be sure they were secured before we got there). It's an old house, built in the early teens, and consequently needs a lot of tlc. I suspect there was a divorce involved, since her name was different on some of the documents, and that she sold because she just couldn't keep up with it all alone. Kind of sad. [ 06 June 2005: Message edited by: Zoot ]
From: Urban prairie. | Registered: Sep 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Américain Égalitaire
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7911
|
posted 06 June 2005 04:12 PM
One thing I have had to live with is rooms that aren't used for anything at present, in our case, right now, we have two guest bedrooms. However, one of them is for Karl who lives with his mum in Cleveland and its his when he visits. He still may one day live in it, but that's another story.The other spare bedroom is for mother in law visits that may, at some time, turn into mother in law come to live with us (either one). So we had to buy a house with these bedrooms just in case. But if any space in the house isn't propertly utilized or has some reason for being, it bothers me. I grew up with friends and relatives (and this is maybe very USian) who had "living rooms" where no one did any living. That is, they were museums inside the house where the most expensive furniture was kept and the most expensive knick knacks as well. In my grandmother's old house, the stereotype was in full flower - the furniture was covered in plastic sheeting. Kids weren't allowed to sit or touch anything and neither were grownups unless it was Christmas or Easter. In other homes I'd come to play, the "living room" was one we just walked by and looked at and went on to our designated play area. I just never understood why you would dress up a room in a home for show and almost never use it. It rubbed me the wrong way then and it still does today. Most of these "living rooms" were just pretentious snobbery thrust up your nose and tacky to the nth degree anyway. Deep wall to wall shag and furniture done up in Mediterranean style Sears.
From: Chardon, Ohio USA | Registered: Jan 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
Sharon
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4090
|
posted 06 June 2005 04:28 PM
quote: I grew up with friends and relatives (and this is maybe very USian) who had "living rooms" where no one did any living.
This was very common in the Maritimes, AE -- and I suspect in other parts of Canada as well. Not at my house, I'm happy to report, but I knew such places. But your description of the furniture is much different from what I remember: old, uncomfortable horsehair chesterfields and chairs, heavy marble-topped tables, dark upright pianos, lace doilies and antimacassars. And no, you weren't allowed to go in there and touch anything. It was often called the "parlour."
From: Halifax, Nova Scotia | Registered: May 2003
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
James
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5341
|
posted 06 June 2005 04:40 PM
Accross the street from where I live, a former school site is being developed into single unit homes. Given my former line of work, I'm watching the activities with interest, and conduct "inspection tours" many evenings. A couple of weeks ago the framing of one of the houses seemed complete, but there was a large stack of oddly shaped roof trusses remaining on the site. I couldn't figure for the life of me how they could be part of the structure, so assumed they had been delivered by mistake and would be a part of one of the as yet unstarted units. I was amazed the next day st see them hoisted onto the purfectly fine roofline, and installed as part of huge false roof that made the structure look twice the size of before. Absolutely wasted space; a complete waste of lumber, plywood, roofing and gable cladding. Plus, it creates a much more complicated rook design with lots of valleys and other potential "leak spots". Nuts.
From: Windsor; ON | Registered: Mar 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
Timebandit
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1448
|
posted 06 June 2005 07:13 PM
quote: Originally posted by Sharon:
This was very common in the Maritimes, AE -- and I suspect in other parts of Canada as well. Not at my house, I'm happy to report, but I knew such places. But your description of the furniture is much different from what I remember: old, uncomfortable horsehair chesterfields and chairs, heavy marble-topped tables, dark upright pianos, lace doilies and antimacassars. And no, you weren't allowed to go in there and touch anything. It was often called the "parlour."
It's very common here, too. Houses are actually being designed with a "formal living room" and what they are now calling a "great room", which I suppose would have been previously called a family or rumpus room. Most of the living rooms in show homes are laid out in a completely impractical way, with very high ceilings and are meant to be designed to the teeth, ie in the showiest way possible. They aren't really meant to be used. I remember the advent of the "family room" in the '70s, and all my family's friends, and eventually my own parents abandoning the living rooms except on special occasions. The tv went to the family room, usually down in the basement, and everybody seemed to follow it. I thought it was a fairly nifty arrangement, as I then had the living room all to myself, a quiet place to read. I've often thought that the shift away from the living room as actual living space was a lot like the "parlours" of earlier decades. My great-Aunt Annie had a parlour that mostly got used for visitors -- but she wasn't fussy the way a lot of people were. She thought old pianos were for small children to bang on. But yes, there were antimacassars.
From: Urban prairie. | Registered: Sep 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
Cartman
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7440
|
posted 06 June 2005 08:07 PM
I grew up in a small community in BC where my folks had a small home with a lot which backed onto the mountains. We set x-country ski trails and hiking trails and that is largely how I spent my youth. It was really quiet and there was a lot of wildlife. Space was basically infinite. I now live in the 'burbs in Calgary with a bunch of stuck up people who only talk about their portfolios and the colour of their next enormous SUV. Funny how my parents had no formal education and I spent years in school in order to start a career, but they enjoyed a better quality of life...anybody got some cheese for my whine?
From: Bring back Audra!!!!! | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
lagatta
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2534
|
posted 06 June 2005 08:56 PM
In rural Québec as well, parlours were common, for the people who could afford them. They were small rooms furnished with the type of furniture Sharon describes, or sometimes a more typical Québec version of the same, and were used only for such formal occasions as the priest calling or for young people to se fréquenter, under the careful watch of older family members. Everyone actually gathered in the very large kitchens of such farmhouses, around the stove. Among Mediterranean immigrants, such as Italians and Portuguese, it is even common to have a clean kitchen for show - as well as a parlour nobody uses except on formal visiting occasions - while the actual household food production - canning, making sausages, etc goes on in the twin basement kitchen. I think it is a way for working-class immigrants, often from rural backgrounds, to show they have "made it", playing a role similar to overelaborate weddings that were unknown in the home country.
From: Se non ora, quando? | Registered: Apr 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Américain Égalitaire
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7911
|
posted 06 June 2005 09:27 PM
quote: A couple of weeks ago the framing of one of the houses seemed complete, but there was a large stack of oddly shaped roof trusses remaining on the site. I couldn't figure for the life of me how they could be part of the structure, so assumed they had been delivered by mistake and would be a part of one of the as yet unstarted units.I was amazed the next day st see them hoisted onto the purfectly fine roofline, and installed as part of huge false roof that made the structure look twice the size of before. Absolutely wasted space; a complete waste of lumber, plywood, roofing and gable cladding. Plus, it creates a much more complicated rook design with lots of valleys and other potential "leak spots". Nuts. [/QB]
I can relate. I don't know if these are popular in Canada but homes that look like this are all the rage of the arriviste here in Cedar Rapids.: Voila! The American Dream. Ugly As Shit, ain't it? Love the soaring gothic garage. Nothing says "I've arrived" more than that. And this is a high end new home. Here's another soaring. . . .thing. People love these. I don't know why.
From: Chardon, Ohio USA | Registered: Jan 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
James
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5341
|
posted 06 June 2005 09:38 PM
Somehow, A.E., it really, really offended me when I saw what was being done there.Perhaps because in all of my design and building endeavours, efficiency and practicallity were front and centre. Whwn I see something like 20% of the enclosed soace of a structure being a useless add-on, it pisses me off. A house wearing falsies.
From: Windsor; ON | Registered: Mar 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Timebandit
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1448
|
posted 06 June 2005 11:45 PM
I hope not, Sharon, because I do, too. I'd actually love to rip out the kitchen, correct one glaring flaw in the way it's laid out, and redo the cupboards entirely. The blond guy, on the other hand, would like to add a turret that goes up all 3 stories. I'm not sure if it's a genuine desire or a way to put me off a reno... I'm probably going to hell for it, but I really, really want a new kitchen. Especially since I'm not moving again until I'm ready for a nursing home.EA, the houses that you've linked to are very much like what's going up in our 'burbs here. Garages, big garages, out front. I don't like attached garages in the first place, and these things all look like people are living in garages. I can't see how you'd ever get to know your neighbors, either, always in the car when you're out of your yard.
From: Urban prairie. | Registered: Sep 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timebandit
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1448
|
posted 08 June 2005 12:23 PM
A lot of the people I know whose kids are grown and on their own are selling their houses and moving to more compact condos. Others, though, have had one or more of their kids move back home with the grandchildren. I also have to wonder -- those families that raised 4 or 5 kids in a two-bedroom house -- would they have done it that way if they'd had the option? I'm betting they'd have gone for a larger house if it had been affordable. Not that that means that a one-child family needs 4000 sqft or anything, just that the nostalgia for cramped families seems a little off-kilter. Just because it's possible doesn't mean it's good.
From: Urban prairie. | Registered: Sep 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
bittersweet
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2474
|
posted 08 June 2005 01:16 PM
A lot of land is wasted by setting houses back so far from the street, and having a "front yard," a third or more of which is a driveway. Why pay taxes on something so useless? It's not even uselessly beautiful. Once in a while you see a house with a huge enclosed double car garage so that the overall effect looks like the actual living quarters above it were an afterthought. The front yards of suburban tract-style homes usually have the most dismal, perfunctory landscaping and horrid fences with mini statues of lions topping the posts and so on. It's abominable. And inside... To make these monsters remotely affordable, the materials and workmanship have to be cheap. The overwhelming effect is thus - surprise! - cheapness. And yet the intention is to look high class. It's pathetic. On the other hand, when you go small, you can afford better materials and workmanship. To maximize space, when we renovated we pushed the front of the "cheapest house on the block" forward as far as allowable. No front yard to speak of, but instead a very pretty entranceway with a tree and landscaping (I'm partial to wild grasses) that can be lit at night. The house is L shaped, so around back is a kind of large and very peaceful courtyard effect, which I'd noticed in Europe. There's a modest sized lawn, a garden and greenhouse, more wild grasses and bamboo, a hammock, and a long harvest table under a tree which is accessed straight from the kitchen. It's not at all a big house, but it's designed to feel much bigger than it is. Because we work from home, we not only needed two offices, but a way to avoid cabin fever. The place had to be a sanctuary. We invested in a good architect/designer (and a contractor sensitive to "green" issues) and went minimal with furnishings. Just the way minimal cooking means each ingredient is crucial, we had to be very careful about the interior so it didn't look cold. So texture and colour became very important. You really start to notice things when you go small! When it's not about the amount of square footage, you have to pay attention to the quality of each square foot, or all you'll end up with is an oppressive little house, not a home. [ 08 June 2005: Message edited by: bittersweet ]
From: land of the midnight lotus | Registered: Apr 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Yukoner
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5787
|
posted 08 June 2005 01:56 PM
What area of TO do you live in Mel?I used to live near Christie and Bloor (Garnet Ave) and it had that type of set up. Lots of 3 story brick places, with porches. The neigbours were all great....Italian and Portugese sitting out on the porches in the hot summer nights drinking vino and chatting. There was this older Jewish widow we would help with yard work and shoveling snow in the winter. She'd always force feed us unhuman amounts of food which was good because I was a student at the time.
I miss TO and that neighbourhood
From: Um, The Yukon. | Registered: May 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Timebandit
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1448
|
posted 08 June 2005 06:03 PM
Several years ago I did some commercials for a developer who was putting up these crap houses in the burbs -- for exorbitant (by Regina standards, anyway) prices. The quality of construction was downright shabby. People will be having 10 times the troubles we have with or 90+ yr old house in 20 years or less, and will have paid much, much more for it in the first place. So sad that people don't recognize poor workmanship.Edited to add: Does anybody else watch Holmes on Homes? [ 08 June 2005: Message edited by: Zoot ]
From: Urban prairie. | Registered: Sep 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Timebandit
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1448
|
posted 08 June 2005 09:48 PM
Omigawd, Rufus, you aren't serious?! I can't watch very many design shows, I have to admit. "Designed" spaces read cold to me, or stuffy and cluttered. TOO coordinated. No real personality. I only like the how-to shows, and not all of them. quote: I purposely bought an older home and don't regret it. Its amazing when I compare heating bills with people in new houses with all the latest improvements and find out they are still spending more for heating than I am (and my house needs many improvements).
Well, we probably pay about what most newer houses of the same size do. We've been slowly upgrading, though, and it's much, much better than when we first moved in. But then, none of the windows (even the upgraded new ones) had been properly insulated or sealed. I can't wait to see how much difference insulating the basement has made when our bill gets equalized in January. Still a long way to go, though.
From: Urban prairie. | Registered: Sep 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Américain Égalitaire
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7911
|
posted 08 June 2005 10:52 PM
People who do that should have their own Devil's Island to be banished to.House porn on trading spaces - anything Hildy does. As for hauntings, I believed the house I live in now had the spirit of the first owner around for awhile after we moved in. I finally told him to scram, that we would take care of the place and that was it. Seriously, some times you can just feel it. Everyone thinks I'm nuts about that but I definately felt it then but certainly not now. Does anyone else ever get that feeling about a presence in a house? Please say yes.
From: Chardon, Ohio USA | Registered: Jan 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
Anchoress
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4650
|
posted 08 June 2005 10:53 PM
quote: Originally posted by Michelle: Good GOD. And can you imagine if you were to do the "entertaining" that you're supposed to do after your house is oh so perfect, how stupid you'd look when your visitors wander over to your bookshelf and say, "Oh, wow, what a collection of books you have - this one looks intere -- um...Michelle, what's up with the fake books?"
Yeah, or even worse, 'Michelle, that's an 1876 translation of Ars Magna! One of those sold on e-bay for FOUR THOUSAND... Oh. I saw that episode too.' [ 08 June 2005: Message edited by: Anchoress ]
From: Vancouver babblers' meetup July 9 @ Cafe Deux Soleil! | Registered: Nov 2003
| IP: Logged
|
|
'lance
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1064
|
posted 08 June 2005 11:15 PM
quote: This was very common in the Maritimes, AE -- and I suspect in other parts of Canada as well. Not at my house, I'm happy to report, but I knew such places.
Certainly not unknown in the Ottawa Valley, either. Where, at many houses, the front door is never used, though maybe a few naive salespeople will try it. quote: I do find the idea of having a turret very interesting though. Maybe someday we'll find a Victorian fixer upper with one. With my luck, it'll probably be haunted.
In Victoria I lived for a while in a beautiful old Victorian -- OK, Edwardian house with a turret, which was actually my kitchen. Nice place, even though the rent was steep. If the house was haunted, the ghost must have appeared in another suite or suites. However, the three-bedroom bungalow I grew up in was haunted by the ghost of... a creek. Our subdivision, on the edge of a small town, was just being finished when we moved in. Previously, there'd been a creek running through the area, which was then diverted around it. The watercourse had run through the lot that became ours. Whenever you divert a river, stream or creek of any size, it will tend to resume its old course. Every spring, the creek remembered the good old days of freedom. Not that it flooded -- though during one exciting spring, thanks to an ice jam, it very nearly did -- but, thanks to the seepage of groundwater that had formerly fed the creek, our basement would fill with six inches or more of water. Of such formative experiences are hydrogeologists made. [ 08 June 2005: Message edited by: 'lance ]
From: that enchanted place on the top of the Forest | Registered: Jul 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
Timebandit
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1448
|
posted 08 June 2005 11:43 PM
quote: Does anyone else ever get that feeling about a presence in a house? Please say yes.
Yes. Really, though, I do sometimes. My mother says we lived in a haunted house when I was about 3 yrs old. Things would move, change position overnight. Mom felt a presence in the kitchen sometimes, warm and comforting presence, though. And I had my one and only imaginary friend. My mother still thinks that I was the only one who could see the ghost, and was friends with it. The house is only a few blocks from here. I went to a garage/yard/house sale there last summer, and was inside for about 15 minutes. Didn't feel anything all that unusual, although I remembered the stair banister and playing peek-a-boo through it. I've gotten the odd sense of presence in some places at other times. The strongest was when I was at an arts camp in my teens. The building was an old TB sanitarium. Every morning at about 6:00, something would brush by my bed, moving from the hallway door to the sun-porch door, and wake me up. The building is still standing, but unused. I want to shoot a movie there someday.
From: Urban prairie. | Registered: Sep 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
Américain Égalitaire
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7911
|
posted 08 June 2005 11:53 PM
Not to turn this into a haunted house thread but I grew up in one too. In my teens when I came home alone at night I couldn't wait to turn every light on the first floor on. Every. one. Things happened, Noises, mounted plates and knickknacks moved. Stuff I can't explain. My father became a believer on night after falling asleep on the couch. He woke to something on top of him that wouldn't let him move. My mum told me about it the next day. I went down to breakfast and make a joke about it. Dad nearly tore my head off. He was an ex-Marine and afraid of nothing. I saw the look on his face and I knew. He succumbed to his lymphoma in the living room in 1983. Whatever was there left with him (and my sister who seemed to be a catalyst for a lot of it). I go back there now and feel nothing that I used to. Weird really.
From: Chardon, Ohio USA | Registered: Jan 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Privateer
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3446
|
posted 09 June 2005 12:30 AM
quote: Certainly not unknown in the Ottawa Valley, either. Where, at many houses, the front door is never used, though maybe a few naive salespeople will try it.
That reminds me of going door-to-door canvassing in rural Atlantic Canada, both in Newfoundland and Nova Scotia (heck, even in many working class urban neighbourhoods). If the front door appears unused (in some cases its high above the ground with no stairs to it), don't bother, they won't answer it. If you actually want to talk to someone, go around to the side or around back...and pray there isn't a big dog waiting for you. They don't mind you going to the side or back door, its not really about evasion, its just a cultural thing.
From: Haligonia | Registered: Dec 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
brebis noire
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7136
|
posted 09 June 2005 07:51 AM
quote: Originally posted by Rufus Polson: I was driven over the edge to the conclusion house porn was evil, evil, evil when on this one show, the decorator person wanted an intellectualish look for this room. So she had the person go buy a bunch of old books, then Cut Off The Spines and glued the spines by themselves into this bookshelfy thing.
Well, thanks Rufus, that's the worst example of cultural home barbarism I've heard yet. The second worst happened when my parents sold their home to move into a condo, and I found out a couple of years later that the lovely, humungous vegetable garden beside the cement pond - the one that mom and dad had faithfully tended and nourished every single year for over 30 years - had been turned into humungous cement deck. When I die, my ghost will return to haunt that deck, and make vegetable vines constantly push through the cracks.
From: Quebec | Registered: Oct 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
Timebandit
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1448
|
posted 09 June 2005 01:05 PM
That's one hard thing about moving on when you've loved a house -- what the new owners do to it. My wee house had a bow window in the dining room that looked out on the space between it and the house next door. The former owners had planted a little crabapple tree in between the houses, and it was just a gorgeous sight -- blossoms in spring, leaves in summer, red apples and changing leaves in the fall, and then some of the apples would hang on over winter and the birds would come. Just beautiful. It kept the light out a bit, but the dining room was open to the living room, which had a nice, big, south-facing picture window, so light was never an issue.Anyway, the new owners have installed heavy drapes on the front window and cut down the tree. I'm sad every time I walk past -- I only moved about 4 blocks away.
From: Urban prairie. | Registered: Sep 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
Mr. Magoo
guilty-pleasure
Babbler # 3469
|
posted 09 June 2005 01:18 PM
quote: Yeah, that's pretty barfy. I like our 1100 square foot house just fine!
So you didn't get the seven bedroom house you initially wanted? House Lust Last week I went to see a house in Toronto that has an 8.5 foot frontage. Yes, that's correct. Eight and a half feet at curbside. It listed for $315K. I saw another that had gorgeous 12 foot ceilings. Sadly though, the largest room was roughly 6 feet by 8 feet. No room in the house was as long or as wide as it was high. Great if you like jumping up and down, or if you have a "multilayer" sofa. It listed for $290K.
From: ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø, | Registered: Dec 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Noslenca
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9554
|
posted 09 June 2005 05:46 PM
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Rufus Polson: [QB]Michelle: I was driven over the edge to the conclusion house porn was evil, evil, evil when on this one show, the decorator person wanted an intellectualish look for this room. So she had the person go buy a bunch of old books, then Cut Off The Spines and glued the spines by themselves into this bookshelfy thing. Shock! Horror! Rage! I could have reached through the screen and strangled that horrible, vulgar, substanceless, ignorant woman!In the days before HGTV house porn, I lived with my ex-husband (a voracious reader) in status-conscious Dallas, Texas. The main downtown branch of the Dallas Public Library held a used book sale every summer. Some of the books were from discontinued library stock, others were contributed by library patrons and businesses. The sale was a readers' delight - particularly if one was a connisseur of old history and science books. It was on the annual 'must do' list, since both of us are voracious readers. One afternoon, my ex went to the sale alone after work. He reported that there seemed to be a ton of old legal books (Southwestern Reporters) that year. They were pratically flying off the shelves and out the door. He asked one of the library volunteers why these outdated case law books were so popular. He was told that a lot of status-obsessed Yuppies liked to use them to decorate their bookshelves. The library volunteer mused her opinion that the Yuppies were trying to cultivate the impression that they were smart people with good taste. Most of the sorts buying these books aren't smart enough to know how to use them, and don't necessarily have good taste, just plenty of coin. How pretentious is that? Not long afterward, I stopped to buy some meats at a small German specialty grocery in a very tony part of town. The butcher invited me to sample a morsel of imported German Braunschweiger (a very high quality liver sausage pate). Impressive tasting stuff, this Braunschweiger. At $20 per pound (USD) it should have been. "Doesn't it taste like foie gras?" he asked. Anybody who thinks they're somebody always serves foie gras at Dallas cocktail parties. Obviously, I was hanging around with the wrong sort of people, because I hadn't eaten foie gras in well over a decade. It did taste somewhat like foie gras! The butcher confessed that he was making a ton of money selling this particular Braunschweiger to local socialites and wanna-bes. They substituted this stuff for the real thing to their impressionable guests, most of whom never guessed that they were eating German Braunschweiger instead of the the real $50 to $500 thing. As I walked out of the store (a pound of $20 Braunschweiger and other goodies in hand), I couldn't help but wonder if those party hosts were the same people who bought all those nice case books to decorate their bookshelves. P.S. I have no idea if those Yuppies ripped off the nice spines from those legal books.
From: Al Gore invented my cable Internet connection | Registered: Jun 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EFA
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9673
|
posted 01 July 2005 08:01 PM
quote: Originally posted by Bacchus: Its amazing how many people are coming to us and saying 2300? thats it? You sure you can fit everything in it?
I can personally attest to the fact that 2 people, 3 cats and 2 dogs can live very happily in 900 square feet.
From: Victoria, BC | Registered: Jun 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
westcoast
recent-rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9832
|
posted 08 July 2005 01:48 AM
quote: Originally posted by Privateer: Is giving gifts to new homeowners that common. I mean we had help from family in buying our place but its not like we're getting married. Anyhow this is the line that stood out for me: What is it with people these days? Why do two people need the amount of space you could have raised a large family in a generation or two ago? I've talked about this before; how in Halifax huge houses are being constructed on multi-acre lots even though the typical family size is less than three people. At the same time, others live in cardboard boxes choking on the car exhaust from the multiple-cars these Yuppies own and commute in for hours everyday so they can live in excessive space on the edge of town. That's my rant for the day.
Too true.
Our last apartment? 900 sq feet. Our "new" (to us) house? 900 sq feet. Hopefully we will be raising a child within these terribly confining walls as well.. For shame: no private bathroom for junior! Will have to learn how to SHARE.
From: Canada | Registered: Jul 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
arborman
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4372
|
posted 08 July 2005 03:29 PM
quote: Originally posted by Gir Draxon:
Livable yes, but I disagree on affordable. The fact is that "yuppies" making good money as professionals are NOT going to concede to living in some stupid $400/month shoebox in a run-down building. If you want those kind of people living closer to the centre of town, you're calling for gentrification. They are going to want to live in a nice place, and why shouldn't they? Well, if you insist on making downtown "affordable" you're never going to see nice places there.
Actually, it's very possible to mix affordable and expensive in the same neighbourhood, even the same building.
From: I'm a solipsist - isn't everyone? | Registered: Aug 2003
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Deep Dish
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9609
|
posted 10 July 2005 01:18 AM
I am house shopping in Regina, right now.Given my student loans and late start in my career, I don't have a bundle to spend but better I keep the equity rather than pay it to some landlord. I am a young professional but not one who has a lot of wealth. I'm noticing a lot of vacant lots in North Central, which for CBC fans is the area "Moccaison Flats" is shot in, and quite a number of homes for sale. I've also heard there are a bunch of crappy rental homes being condemned and bulldozed. I will probably buy on the fringes of this area, the houses are not pricey and the urban drama is in easy walking distance but not right on the doorstep - that much I can afford. Urban Renewal is a concept I find fascinating, but it just tends to move problems, this will be interesting. Zoot, your comment on 90 year old houses lightened my heart. I like the house porn because it will help me to make good decisions, but once I am all set I will stop watching it. I know I became less of a clothes-horse after I stopped reading Details and GQ. All this said, House buying is very scary. [ 10 July 2005: Message edited by: Deep Dish ]
From: halfway between the gutter and the stars | Registered: Jun 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|