|
Author
|
Topic: Happy Birthday, Karl Marx!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478
|
posted 05 May 2005 05:36 PM
Not a lively Marxist crowd here this evening, is it? So, ok: Das Kapital is boring. I mean, I found it boring, the early bits that I read. That's not to say that it isn't important -- just, y'know, like most economics textbooks, deeply boring. All the same, The Communist Manifesto is a gem of rhetoric, one of the great achievements of Western literature (probably partly because Karl was lifting a certain amount from Jean-Jacques Rousseau, but hey, allusions are all part of the literary game, yes?). Och, Karl. You have left us with so many problems. But you had your eyes on the prize, and for that, some of us are still grateful. Here's to human equality. Liberty, equality, fraternity. One day.
From: gone | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lagatta
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2534
|
posted 06 May 2005 11:27 AM
Yes, there is a very similar series of photos of prisoners in the Gulag about to be shot in the days of the Great Purges. Indeed, we could well start up a 30th anniversary memorial thread to the victims of the Khmers Rouges very soon, alas. The problem will be how to keep it from being infested with trolls. I recall seeing something just as affecting in the small cluster of southeast Asian shops near me, on St-Denis just south of Jean-Talon: a couple of photos of young women, aged somewhere between 18 -23 or so, "missing since 1975" in Cambodia, that a desperate relative was seeking out. Obviously those women, who'd be my age now, were long dead, but the relative or friend must have derived some relief from the very act of seeking them out or making their long-ago disappearance public.
From: Se non ora, quando? | Registered: Apr 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grady Wilson
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8772
|
posted 07 May 2005 05:38 PM
skdadl wrote: quote: I thought that the Volkspolizei were Hitler's?
No, the VoPos were a product of the DDR regime. An easy enough mistake to make, I suppose, for a dilettante in the field of applied Marxism. The main task of the VoPos was to apprehend any infiltrators from their jealous western neighbour, who might manage to somehow circumvent the impenatrable "anti-fascist protection barrier". Their hope was to enjoy the much higher standard of living, political freedom, and economic prosperity available to every DDR citizen, and so envied by the West. The "anti-fascist protection barrier" was virtually 100% effective, as almost nobody from the West dared to sneak into the DDR. In fact, it was so effective, the guards turned around most of the machine gun turrets to face the east, so that they could enjoy some extra sun in the morning. Yet another testament to the superior socialist working conditions of the DDR!
From: enjoyin' some ripple | Registered: Apr 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Grady Wilson
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8772
|
posted 07 May 2005 06:00 PM
lagatta wrote: quote: Yeah, will he be accusing Jesus Christ of the Inquisition, religious wars, Crusades with their massacres and pillage, and various persecutions of heretics, Jews, witches and cats?
A rather desperate analogy, don't you think? Aside from Christianity and Marxism both being types of religions, your analogy fails mainly on the basis that every manifestation of the Christian religion has not resulted in Inquisitions, etc. By comparison, I challenge you to present us with one single instance where a real-world manifestation of Marxist political philosophy hasn't given rise to massive repression and murder. Take all the time you want. However, I do agree with you that communism looks wonderful -- on paper, at least. quote: Though not to worry - such trolls never last long on the board.
My, how ominous -- yet at the same time, essentially Marxist. I'll be one of the first up against the wall, eh? But what is it I've said which has you so worried? If Marxist theory is so wonderful, shouldn't the facts speak for themselves? Why do you find it necessary to make such veiled threats? quote: It always amuses me no end when some yahoo insinuates that I'm a fan of Stalinism.
While I don't deny being a "yahoo", I vigorously deny insinuating that you are "a fan of Stalinism". You've managed to do that all by yourself.
From: enjoyin' some ripple | Registered: Apr 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
lagatta
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2534
|
posted 07 May 2005 06:47 PM
Palatinate Wine Sauerkraut with Grilled Sausages or Pfaelzer WeinkrautThis sort of dish can be found with variations throughout the Rhineland; and on the Alsace side as well. In many Germans' minds, this traditional savoury pie is inseparable from the fall grape harvest. In the earliest part of the winemaking process, the juices from crushed grapes are separated off and allowed to begin fermentation. The resulting effervescent liquid has a pleasant fruit taste that changes from day to day as it ages, though it is most often compared to cider or pear juice. At harvest festivals, stalls feature glasses of this fresh wine mixture, called "Federweisser", paired with a warm slice of onion pie. The pie's popularity has led neighbourhood bakeries to offer slices as well, and this treat is a popular snack with students. (lagatta notes that vegetarians and non-pork eaters can simply omit the bacon; it is utterly authentic - there was a large Jewish community in the Rhineland). 8 servings Ingredients: 1 package active dry yeast 1 teaspoon sugar 1 1/2 teaspoons salt 3 cups flour 1 tablespoon shortening 1 cup warm water 6 slices bacon, cut-up 2 medium onions, sliced 1/4 teaspoon cumin 1/2 teaspoon salt pepper 1 egg yolk 1 cup sour cream Directions: Mix together yeast, sugar, l teaspoon salt, and 1/2 cup flour. Blend in shortening and warm water. Beat for 2 minutes. Add enough flour to make a soft dough (between 2-3 cups). Knead dough until smooth and elastic (this should take about 5 minutes). Place dough in a lightly greased bowl. Cover and let dough rise in a warm place for 30 minutes. Meanwhile, fry bacon until crisp. Remove from pan and drain on absorbent paper. Add onions to bacon drippings in pan; cook slowly over moderate heat until softened, do not let not brown. Pat dough onto a lightly greased 12-inch baking sheet. Press up edges to make a slight rim. Sprinkle onion, bacon, cumin, remaining 1/2 teaspoon salt, and pepper over dough. Bake at 400° for 20 minutes. Meanwhile, blend egg yolk and sour cream. Pour over partially baked pie. Return pie to oven and bake until golden brown, about 10 minutes. Serve warm. Guten Appetit! --- lagatta is very amused as being called a Stalinist, as are all her friends. lagatta once broke up with a (new) boyfriend because he thought the Khmers Rouges were unfairly maligned.
From: Se non ora, quando? | Registered: Apr 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
Grady Wilson
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8772
|
posted 07 May 2005 06:53 PM
lagatta wrote: quote: I think the best thing to be done with trolls that spam the board and deliberately vandalise thoughtful threads - or even ones where babblers are enjoying themselves - is to complain to the moderators.
I'm deeply sorry that I have interfered with you enjoying yourself. However, I see nothing "thoughtful" about this thread. On the contrary, I see people deliberately evading and ignoring the fact that in every single case where it has been applied, Marxist theory has had horrific and unspeakable consequences. By the same token, would you sit idly by while people raise giddy toasts to the author of Mein Kampf, while studiously ignoring the existance of gas chambers and concentration camps? By all accounts, Hitler was a very gracious host who loved children and animals -- a vegetarian, even. Why trouble ourselves with the inevitable consequences of his theories? How rude to even mention it! After all, we're trying to enjoy ourselves. Why let some "troll" spoil our fun?! quote: Trolls aren't even reading what we have written or cited and are not remotely interested in interreaction or dialogue.
Rather difficult to do, when you are working so feverishly to have me banned, isn't it? But then, you're not really interested in any sort of interaction or dialogue, unless it is of the back-slapping, mutually congratulatory variety, are you? I wish I could join in your fun and enjoyable admiration of Herr Marx, but for some reason I can't. I am lucky enough to have never suffered under Marxism directly, but as a first-generation Canadian, I can't say the same for memebers of my family. I have aunts, uncles and cousins who have experienced life in the DDR, and know what it's like to be a "Young Pioneer"; what it's like to deal with the VoPos and the Stasi. I have other family members who have spent a decade in Soviet P.O.W. camps, doing forced labour, and a few who never survived the experience. Over the years I have also gotten to know fellow students and work colleagues, and made some good friends who have variously managed to escape Marxist regimes such as Poland, the USSR, Nicaragua, Vietnam, China, Romania, Czechoslovakia, and even Cambodia. Having heard some of their horrific experiences, and then seeing dilettantes like you -- who will never suffer the consequences -- toasting Karl Marx is a nauseating affront.
From: enjoyin' some ripple | Registered: Apr 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Grady Wilson
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8772
|
posted 07 May 2005 07:05 PM
lagatta writes: quote: Trolls aren't even reading what we have written or cited and are not remotely interested in interreaction or dialogue.
... later on, lagatta writes: quote: Palatinate Wine Sauerkraut with Grilled Sausages or Pfaelzer Weinkraut
Uh, riiiight ...
From: enjoyin' some ripple | Registered: Apr 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grady Wilson
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8772
|
posted 07 May 2005 07:16 PM
Hinterland wrote: quote: Does anyone else ever wish their inchoate anger could be as focussed and scathing as Grady's?
How can my anger be both "inchoate", yet at the same time "focussed"? How does that work? quote: Or do you have to be an American to be that obnoxious?
Yes, well, speaking of obnoxious ...
From: enjoyin' some ripple | Registered: Apr 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
Hinterland
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4014
|
posted 07 May 2005 07:18 PM
quote: Palatinate Wine Sauerkraut with Grilled Sausages or Pfaelzer Weinkraut
Lecker!...actually, not really. I don't like German food. Here's my recipe for une bonne soupe aux pois. One big ham hock (or two small ones)...not to be confused with pork hocks. It has to be a smoked hock. 1 kg of yellow peas, soaked overnight and drained 5 cloves of garlic, finely chopped 4 onions, chopped 500g carrots, julienned 4 bay leaves small bunch of thyme, tied up with thread Dill Worcestershire and Dijon Mustard (a tbs or so of each) 2-3 liters of quality chicken stock Sautée garlic, dill in butter. Add oninons. Cook oninons until juices flow and the onions start to become clear. Add mustard, Worcestershire Add stock and bring to a boil Add peas Add thyme and bay leaves. Add ham hock(s) and enough water to cover. Bring to a boil, then reduce to simmer. Cook for one hour or so. Remove hock, and separate meat from skin, bones, fat, etc. Chop meat from hock and return to pot Bring to boil and reduce to simmer for about 2 hours (until peas become a paste) Add carrots, and cook until tender (about 20 minutes) Remove thyme bunch and bay leaves, and serve. [ 07 May 2005: Message edited by: Hinterland ]
From: Québec/Ontario | Registered: Apr 2003
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hinterland
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4014
|
posted 07 May 2005 07:30 PM
quote: Hinterland and skdadl, pray tell, what is the appropriate wine to serve with Troll? And what should I prepare as a salad, and if possible, a dessert?
For wine, Ripple comes to mind, for some reason. As for salad, I find the bitterness of endive to be appropriate with Troll. To cleanse the palate though, a life-affirming dessert of fresh wild berries is what the savvy hostess is serving this season. ...it's a good thing.
From: Québec/Ontario | Registered: Apr 2003
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hinterland
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4014
|
posted 07 May 2005 07:42 PM
quote: How can my anger be both "inchoate", yet at the same time "focussed"? How does that work?
Here's how it works, ya big moron. You have a huge well of inchoate anger. Rather than addressing that, you focus that anger on being snide and obnoxious. Any further questions?
From: Québec/Ontario | Registered: Apr 2003
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
'lance
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1064
|
posted 07 May 2005 09:01 PM
quote: I think that Grady Wilson is trying to tell us that he has an ahistorical view of history. Certainly of biography.
But don't you realize, skdadl -- some thoughts and ideas are so deeply dangerous, so unspeakably evil, that they must remain, indeed, unspoken, and even unthought? That they are as powerful as incantations and can cause -- all by themselves -- momentous and terrible consequences generations after their proponents have died, in countries and circumstances of which they knew nothing? Why, it's positively sinister! (And "sinister," as we know, derives from the ancient Mesopotamian for "left"! Coincidence? I think not!)
From: that enchanted place on the top of the Forest | Registered: Jul 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Grady Wilson
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8772
|
posted 07 May 2005 10:40 PM
Hinterland writes: quote: Here's how it works, ya big moron. You have a huge well of inchoate anger. Rather than addressing that, you focus that anger on being snide and obnoxious.
Ah, now I think I get it. Thank you. quote: Any further questions?
Well, yes. Would it count if I had written something like this?: quote: Here's how it works, ya big moron. You have a huge well of inchoate anger. Rather than addressing that, you focus that anger on being snide and obnoxious. Any further questions?
Thanks for straightening me out.
From: enjoyin' some ripple | Registered: Apr 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hinterland
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4014
|
posted 07 May 2005 11:06 PM
quote: For a while I had a piece of yellow sticky paper on my monitor that read "think twice before hitting "send". Worked for me.
My Post-It said "Do you really want to make a fool of yourself?" Some things I just can't ignore. I have an instinct for hatefulness, which I can't dismiss. But, impulse-control is a useful skill.
From: Québec/Ontario | Registered: Apr 2003
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Grady Wilson
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8772
|
posted 08 May 2005 02:13 AM
'lance wrote: quote: But don't you realize, skdadl -- some thoughts and ideas are so deeply dangerous, so unspeakably evil, that they must remain, indeed, unspoken, and even unthought?
I certainly don't advocate that at all. On the contrary, a review of this thread will show you that this is, in fact, what seems to be the prevailing attitude toward the issues which I have raised. I would be more than happy to engage in discussion. Instead, what I've gotten so far are personal attacks, veiled threats, and idiotic recipes -- while, at the same time, being hypocritically accused of "vandalising" this thread. quote: That they are as powerful as incantations and can cause -- all by themselves -- momentous and terrible consequences generations after their proponents have died, in countries and circumstances of which they knew nothing?
I suppose if you insist on being disingenuous, then of course Marx's theories in and of themselves were perfectly harmless. Obviously, Marx couldn't have known with any certainty the real-world implications of his philosophy. Marx did not have the benefit of hind-sight. You and the other participants in this thread do not have this excuse. Now in the Twenty-first Century, since the Stasi and KGB vaults have been opened, to happily celebrate Marx's theories, while evading any mention of their repeated and inevitable outcome, is both intellectually dishonest and highly odious.
From: enjoyin' some ripple | Registered: Apr 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
Grady Wilson
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8772
|
posted 08 May 2005 02:35 AM
lagatta wrote: quote: Usually I've become pretty good at ignoring trolls but this one deliberately vandalised a thread that was going well and attracting both serious and fun contributions.
In what way was this thread "going well"? I assume you mean you were successful in avoiding certain inconvenient historical facts, until I weighed in. I sincerely apologise for having taken all the fun out of Marxism. quote: At a certain point it is like having something you've written or painted vandalised.
In this case, you've been writing bad science fiction. When I'm not busy letting the air out of your tires, I like to amuse myself by burning down orphanages. quote: Downright Stalinist, if I dare say so
Really? I'm not the one offering authoritarian responses to anyone who happens to disagree with me (ie., some of your previous posts in this thread). You obviously need to review what the definition of "Stalinism" is. quote: I've learnt better than to respond to them - there is no point whatsoever.
No doubt, particularly if your goal is to remain obliviously wrapped in your romantic fantasies about Marxism. I just happen to think that sort of naive silliness needs a counter-balance. No doubt you'd be happier without that. [ 08 May 2005: Message edited by: Grady Wilson ]
From: enjoyin' some ripple | Registered: Apr 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
Grady Wilson
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8772
|
posted 08 May 2005 02:55 AM
beluga2 wrote: quote: I thought this was very clever.
Oh yes, I'm extremely crafty, and full of guile. Look up "mendacity" in the encyclopedia, and you'll see my picture. quote: By blatantly adopting the intellectual techniques of Stalinism -- repeating a scurrilous and baseless lie against a dissident who is not present to defend himself -- Grady was actually making an ironic condemnation of Stalinism. Brilliant.
Aside from being yet another person on this thread who seems to have a very shakey understanding of what constitutes "Stalinism", you also seem to be blissfully unaware that Chomsky's apologetics on behalf of Brother #1 are a matter of public record, and have been for quite a long time. "...executions have numbered at most in the thousands; that these were localized in areas of limited Khmer Rouge influence and unusual peasant discontent, where brutal revenge killings were aggravated by the threat of starvation resulting from the American destruction and killing." -- Distortions at Fourth Hand, Noam Chomsky & Edward S. Herman,The Nation, June 6, 1977 See? They merely bumped off a few thousand trouble-making peasants who probably deserved it, and in any case -- it was all America's fault! "The "slaughter" by the Khmer Rouge is a Moss-New York Times creation." -- Ibid There are literally dozens and dozens of instances over the years, in which Chomsky makes similar looney-tunes statements. And then there are the ones in which he completely contradicts himself. But what do I know, I'm just a "Stalinist", and that's fodder for another thread. [ 08 May 2005: Message edited by: Grady Wilson ]
From: enjoyin' some ripple | Registered: Apr 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478
|
posted 08 May 2005 09:38 AM
Hmmmn. Repeated multiple postings. That is considered exceptionally bad netiquette, at least.And you express above the offence you are taking that no one has addressed the issues you raised. But you didn't raise issues. You started out posting repeated reductionist illustrations that do not raise "issues," plural: they simply express a single opinion, which goes something like this: quote: since the Stasi and KGB vaults have been opened, to happily celebrate Marx's theories, while evading any mention of their repeated and inevitable outcome, is both intellectually dishonest and highly odious.
You think that nothing about Marx is worth discussing, because you also think that all of Marx's work "inevitably" leads to one outcome. You are entitled to write a couple of lines saying that. But that isn't what you did. We could tell at once that that was your opinion, but you didn't offer it articulately or honestly and wait for refutation -- you just trolled the board. For the record, no one agrees with your feeble, single, ahistorical opinion, but that's a side issue. Your behaviour from the outset was egregious. This thread wasn't about you and your single feeble opinion, and yet you are claiming offence? You are offended that everything isn't always about you? Seek help. But leave discussions of what Marx actually did to people who are interested in that topic and have something useful to say.
From: gone | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
Wilf Day
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3276
|
posted 08 May 2005 10:44 AM
quote: Originally posted by Grady Wilson: I have aunts, uncles and cousins who have experienced life in the DDR, and know what it's like to be a "Young Pioneer"; what it's like to deal with the VoPos and the Stasi.
Since so many of Marx's self-proclaimed admirers savagely misapplied his thought, it not easy debating what his reputation should be, and perhaps not productive either. I'd be much more interested in any insight as to the continuing support for the PDS in the former DDR. I realize it transformed itself from the former Communist Party, but still, many ex-Marxists who decided to become social democrats joined the social-democratic party. In the territory of the former DDR, plus West Berlin, the PDS got 15.3% of the vote in the last German federal election, and does even better in some Land elections. Have they simply become a left-democratic-socialist party, such as many European countries have? But their support in the former West Germany is still minimal, so they have obviously inherited some genuine support for the former communist party. What accounts for this? Of course we can all read discussions of this, but some first-hand or second-hand knowledge would actually be interesting.
From: Port Hope, Ontario | Registered: Oct 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Boinker
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 664
|
posted 12 May 2005 07:34 PM
Karl Marx as a person was similar in personalty to William Morris - friendly man with a sense of humour to accompany his fierce and terrible intellect.The chief function of Marxism seemed to be to categorize terms and fiercely defend their boundaries to the extreme end of the logic that drove him. What redeems his philosophy is that ultimately it was about class conciousness and was not so successful at a causal relationship between blind human economic behavior and history. Yet astonishingly his view that human economic behaviour was an natural phenomenon modified by human conciousness has been largely accepted today. The only difference is that the capitalist powers have appropriated the means of creating that conciousness so successfully that the conciousness Marc hoped would change the world - the recognition of our species being - has been subordinated to the parochial interests of the ruling classes. The class society has not been obliterated but merely made bigger and better with the rulers far up in the untouchable stratosphere with the proletariat seduced in the West with the baubles of consumerism. Attributing the evils of totalitarianism to Marx is just wrong. It was capitalist America that gave fascist Germany the ideas about eugenics that drobe the holocaust. It was the European powers that planned to invade the fledgling communist state and provoked the militaristic reaction that led to Stalin. It was the short sighted failure of the colonial powers like France and England to promote democracy in te orient that led to despots like Pol Pot, the Kymer Rouge, the Gang of Four, and the numerous other lunatics that called the big bluff of bourgoise democracy around the world. The irony is that if the US did not spend half a trillion dollars a year on armaments US capitalism would fail and the world would no doubt be much better off.
From: The Junction | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|