babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » rabble content   » babble book lounge   » Tarek Fatah's book reviewed in Toronto Star

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Tarek Fatah's book reviewed in Toronto Star
bhagat
recent-rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7012

posted 09 May 2008 02:40 PM      Profile for bhagat        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The Toronto Star review of Tarek Fatah's new book, "Chasing a Mirage: The Tragic Illusion of an Islamic State," describes it as the "Broaching the Mother of all Taboos"
From: Mississauga | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged
Cueball
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4790

posted 09 May 2008 02:42 PM      Profile for Cueball   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Tarek Fatah is an embarrasment to the left.
From: Out from under the bridge and out for a stroll | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
Stargazer
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6061

posted 09 May 2008 03:13 PM      Profile for Stargazer     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I agree with you on that point Cueball. I recently subscribed to his essays and have read a few of them and I'm not very impressed with how he is coming across. On the one hand he appears to be a defender of Muslims, but with the other hand he gives a lot of fuel to the Muslim hating crowd (which will surely grow as his essays and books are used to further cement the "truth", as racists see it).
From: Inside every cynical person, there is a disappointed idealist. | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
sanizadeh
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14787

posted 09 May 2008 05:53 PM      Profile for sanizadeh        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Haven't read Fatah's book, but two comments on the review:

1) Fatah is absolutely right that any state based on the current understanding of Islam would be a total failure,

2) and he is incorrect, or rather wishful, to suggest that the idea is against the prophet Mohammad's teachings.

Somewhere along the path of the fight against Islamic extremism, we should start to acknowledge that the root of most problems with Islamic extremism and fundamentalism is precisely in some Islamic teachings (or more accurately, the current understanding of Islam by muslims), not just the "perversion of principles".

Notwithstanding the fuel such acknowledgment might give to the anti-muslim crowd.


From: Ontario | Registered: Dec 2007  |  IP: Logged
bhagat
recent-rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7012

posted 11 May 2008 03:45 PM      Profile for bhagat        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
It speaks volumes of the Left in Canada when Cueball and Stargazer can dismiss Tarek Fatah's book without having read it and suggest that he is an embarssament to the Left.

I am going through chapter 3 of the 432 page book and I couldn't help notice that Fatah's book gets the endorsement of two of Pakistan's leading figures on the Left; peace activist, Prof. Pervez Hoodbhoy and Socialist Labour Party secretary general, Farooq Tariq. Both of their accolades appear on the back cover of "Chasing a Mirage."

Would it be too much to expect that people read the book, (if not wishing to buy it, borrow it from the library) and only then slam it and the author?

The Huffington Post, Guardian, and the Toronto Star all cannot be wrong in their praise of the uathor and his tome.


From: Mississauga | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged
Cueball
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4790

posted 11 May 2008 04:55 PM      Profile for Cueball   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I didn't have to read everything written by Ayn Rand, in order to come to a conclusion about her work and her ideas. I have seen enough of Fatah, both personally, politically and in print to know what he is all about. He is a shameless granstander and also more than a little duplicitous as a person, imo. I was quite impressed with him when I first met him, but after watching how he operates, I have nor respect for him whatsoever.

Note: I made no comment about the book. I haven't read it. How could I comment on the content. I made a statement about the man himself. In my view he is a traitor to all causes that he says he represents, I imagine it is the same with Islam, as it was with the NDP and the left in general, therefore he is an embarassment.

As for the review, it is obviously not worth the paper it is printed on since it is evident by the comparison to Irshad Manji, that the reviewer is particularly ignorant of this topic, as if Manji someone who spent 6 month at a religious school qualifies as an expert on a religion. I doubt John Goddard has picked up a copy of the Qu'ran, ever, so one has to ask, why would they pick this writer to review a critique of Islam? The Star has on staff an excelent Muslim editorialist in the form of Haroon Siddiqi. One has to wonder why he was not asked to review this book.

In all likelyhood he refused.

And furthermore, Fatah lied in the review, when he said he resigned from the MCC in order to lower his profile because of death threats. *Scoff* and now you are publishing books and giving interviews in the Star? Why did you not also resign your position on the Board of the
Progressive Muslim Union, if the limelight is too dangerous? One thing is for sure Fatah is not afraid of publicity, and playing up his victimized maverik Muslim status is just another one of his tricks get some more.

Just a cheap con man scumbag.

[ 11 May 2008: Message edited by: Cueball ]


From: Out from under the bridge and out for a stroll | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
KenS
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1174

posted 12 May 2008 04:44 AM      Profile for KenS     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Tarek is a deliberately polarizing figure. That's true even if you don't call him or see him as a grandstander.

There are a lot of people, such as the Pakistanis pointed to, who share a lot of Tarek's priorities, so they are going to support him... whether or not they endorse his approach.

Personally: I don't like Tarek's reverse jihadist approach at all. But the 'reasonable approach' has not been a smashing success either. Alarmists have their purposes.

So I don't condemn Tarek Fatah. I stand back and watch. [But yes, I do wonder at times.]

ETA: Haven't read the book. But I can see how it could easily be very different than Tarek's polarizing public presence.... that a lot or even most of the content is the appeal to reason aimed at giving liberal and progressive Muslims the intellectual tools for distancing themselves from the mainstream orthodoxy that way too many of them acquiesce and deferr to in the final analysis.

[ 12 May 2008: Message edited by: KenS ]


From: Minasville, NS | Registered: Aug 2001  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca