babble home - news for the rest of us
today's active topics

FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » archived babble   » the middle east and central asia   » British Memo: Wants Iran Resolution To Be Militarily Enforcable

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: British Memo: Wants Iran Resolution To Be Militarily Enforcable
Babbler # 3214

posted 21 March 2006 06:39 AM      Profile for drgoodword   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Monday's meeting, hosted by British Foreign Office Director John Sawers, occurred hours after a letter came to light detailing Britain's approach to Iran. The confidential document from Sawers laid out a scenario to try to get Russia and China behind increasingly tough measures to pressure Iran to abandon uranium enrichment and reprocessing.

Sawers said Britain's assessment is that the Iranians "will not feel under much pressure" from a Security Council statement alone, "and they will need to know that more serious measures are likely."

He envisioned adoption of a follow-up Security Council resolution in early May which would make Iran's suspension of uranium enrichment mandatory. Britain wants the resolution adopted under Chapter VII of the U.N. Charter, which means it would be militarily enforceable, Sawers said.


This highlights one of many problems the US is facing with the Iran situation. Prior to the Iraq invasion, they had a flimsy "legal" excuse for military action via a very broad reading of UN Resolution 1441. But with regards to Iran, they have no legal cover yet, and as I've mentioned before, they're unlikely to get it because Iran has slyly allied itself with Russia and China--especially China with energy deals--and Moscow and Bejing can stall on a resolution for years. Furthermore, I think both Russia and China have drawn a line in the sand at the Iran border, where they will not tolerate any further US expansion in the region.

In any case, this much is clear: the US is starting up the sanctions/military-action machine all over again to do the same thing to Iran that they did to Iraq. I oppose any sanctions or military action against Iran, even if they were to develop nuclear weapons, and I've written to my political representatives and newspapers to express my opposition, and suggest all those opposed to this repeat of recent history do the same.

From: Toronto | Registered: Oct 2002  |  IP: Logged
Babbler # 4790

posted 21 March 2006 04:50 PM      Profile for Cueball   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
All I can say is: 1441
From: Out from under the bridge and out for a stroll | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
Frustrated Mess
Babbler # 8312

posted 21 March 2006 08:18 PM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Iran has yet to break any international nuclear agreements (can the same be said of the US?), and there is yet no evidence that Iran is persuing nuclear technology beyond power generation.

How many times can they get away with the same schtick before people get tired of body bags?

From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008