babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


  
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » archived babble   » the NDP   » Approach for Elections

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Approach for Elections
Guêpe
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4757

posted 11 January 2004 10:40 PM      Profile for Guêpe   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
1) What should the long term electoral goals of the NDP be? Why?
2) How should those goals be acheived? Why?
3) What should the short term (next election) goals be? Why?

From: Ottawa | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
Tommy
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4822

posted 12 January 2004 12:17 AM      Profile for Tommy   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
1) What should the long term electoral goals of the NDP be?
TO FORM GOVERNMENT

2) How should those goals be acheived? Why?
-BY ADAPTING A MODERATE, PROGRESSIVE AGENDA THAT IS MODERN AND MAINSTREAM LIKE THE SOCIAL DEMOCRATIC PARTIES IN SWEDEN AND GERMANY FOR EXAMPLE.
-NEED TO STAY AWAY FROM BIG UNION INFLUENCES

3) What should the short term (next election) goals be? Why?
-TO BECOME OFFICIAL OPPOSITION. TO MATCH OR EXCEED THE NUMBER OF SEATS THEY WON DURING ED BROADBENT DAYS.


From: Edmonton | Registered: Jan 2004  |  IP: Logged
Schmillis
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3685

posted 12 January 2004 05:38 AM      Profile for Schmillis     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Guêpe:
1) What should the long term electoral goals of the NDP be? Why?
2) How should those goals be acheived? Why?
3) What should the short term (next election) goals be? Why?

I agree with Tommy's answers for #1 and #3, but I'll take a different stand on #2. That goal should be achieved by, first and foremost, realizing that governments are not elected, they are defeated. The trick is to position yourself as the best and obvious alternative when voters tire of the current party in power.

Our performance in the 2004 election is critical to our chances in 2008. If we can achieve Official Opposition in 2004, and spend the next four years being the best O.O. this country has ever seen (which I have little doubt we'd be able to do), and positioning ourselves by demonstrating, daily, our effectiveness and our better ideas, then in 2008 it won't seem pie-in-the-sky to go for an NDP Government, as it would now if we made that claim. In 2008, after 4 years of Paul Martin conservatism, when people are looking for an alternative, the CPC will look like an even further rightward move and we'll look like a return to Canadian values. (This is all provided we play our cards right and provide a mixture of, yes, exposing the governments faults, but more importantly, laying out what an NDP government would do instead).

Do we move away from unions? Well, as Jack said, what are unions? They are working people organized in groups because of the realization that they are stronger together than alone against their boss. So do we move away from working people organized together? Umm... no.


From: Edmonton | Registered: Feb 2003  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca